ccrunner609 wrote:
In a 12 month cycle where you have to put your body through 2 peak phases means that you also have 2 phases of rebuilding. A runner can spend 4-8 weeks preparing for one race in the fall and one in the spring to peak for, they then spend 3-6 weeks of down time or junk running recouping from that peak.
Add that up and you have aot of time ignoring the development of long term physiological training required to really change your running. When you have one season you can have alot more time spent in each phase of training.
Sorry if I'm branching off here....since we are talking about the peaking and only possibly having two phases in a year. (This idea is what almost all schools follow because of the two sports of XC and track.)
This topic got me thinking, my addition below is to past rants with 609....sorry everyone.
Schul and his "nutty" workouts, that worked best for developing long term, as in years and years, not twice a year. Schul prepared for one race, Tokyo. He beat himself up for a long time, gradually getting faster.
Why I still think it has benefits, geez it's nearly 3am.
A kid could get silly and get better quick, if they were willing to take enough Advil. (cough cough)
Maybe even A kid who has not developed much and is in his final year wants to take a chance.
I think the key with Schul's training is the total time of the workout. You keep your heart rate elevated for an extended period of time, while training at a pace slightly faster then race pace, yet still not reaching lactic because of the walking and multiple sets.
One of these days I'm going to get up the nerves to e-mail Rich Davis at Dayton....
he knows everything.