No.Tiernan;1493994 wrote:Is Mack better than Clownface? Too early to tell I suspect but Mack definitely put himself in the conversation today.
Different positions genius.Tiernan;1493994 wrote:Is Mack better than Clownface? Too early to tell I suspect but Mack definitely put himself in the conversation today.
lol you serious? Or drunk?Tiernan;1493994 wrote:Is Mack better than Clownface? Too early to tell I suspect but Mack definitely put himself in the conversation today.
Are they both DL / LB players dillweed?LJ;1494014 wrote:Different positions genius.
Tiernan;1494021 wrote:Are they both DL / LB players dillweed?
You're stupid even by drunk driving standards.Tiernan;1493994 wrote:Is Mack better than Clownface? Too early to tell I suspect but Mack definitely put himself in the conversation today.
As an OLB and DE they both have rush and perimeter containment responsibilities that are very similar and often evenore so in the NFL but since you've never actually coached any football you wouldn't know much about any of that would you?LJ;1494022 wrote:Mack is a pure LB.
Clowney is a pure DE
Tiernan;1494033 wrote:As an OLB and DE they both have rush and perimeter containment responsibilities that are very similar and often evenore so in the NFL but since you've never actually coached any football you wouldn't know much about any of that would you?
I can hear Springsteen singing "Glory Days..."LJ;1494038 wrote:I also played in a 3-3-3-2 stack defense in HS. I can tell you from experience that they are not comparable in the least
Tiernan;1494046 wrote:I can hear Springsteen singing "Glory Days..."
So what? The statement made was that Mack would be the best DEFENDER OSU faced all year. Not the best at a certain position.LJ;1494035 wrote:Lol!!!! Clowney is not a stand up end with pass coverage responsibilities. Macks primary responsibility is to scrape and fill and to drop into pass coverage. Clowneys main responsibility is to set the edge and rush the passer
WebFire;1494065 wrote:So what? The statement made was that Mack would be the best DEFENDER OSU faced all year. Not the best at a certain position.
That wasn't even the point. The point is you are busting balls about position comparisons when it's not even relevant.LJ;1494070 wrote:What other projected top 5 picks will OSU fave this year?
Yeah thought so :rolleyes:
It was relevant because Tiernan brought the comparison to Clowney up.WebFire;1494079 wrote:That wasn't even the point. The point is you are busting balls about position comparisons when it's not even relevant.
And OSU doesn't face Clowney. So why the argument anyway?Pick6;1494080 wrote:It was relevant because Tiernan brought the comparison to Clowney up.
It was in reference to to this. He's not.WebFire;1494079 wrote:That wasn't even the point. The point is you are busting balls about position comparisons when it's not even relevant.
Tiernan;1493994 wrote:Is Mack better than Clownface? Too early to tell I suspect but Mack definitely put himself in the conversation today.
I know why he said. But OSU doesn't face Clowney and it wasn't a position argument. Doesn't matter to me. Carry on.Automatik;1494189 wrote:It was in reference to to this. He's not.
WebFire;1494190 wrote:I know why he said. But OSU doesn't face Clowney and it wasn't a position argument. Doesn't matter to me. Carry on.
Really?Tiernan;1494200 wrote:I will rile up the locals by stating Mack outplayed our own Butkus candidate by about 1,000x yesterday. Cramping or not Shazier didn't show up yesterday.