vball10set;1448914 wrote:It's your bday, go get drunk
I'm never drinking again ever
vball10set;1448914 wrote:It's your bday, go get drunk
Glory Days;1448917 wrote:this.
Had he thrown 3 straight like that there would have been a benches clearing brawl...Midstate01;1448921 wrote:And I don't blame swish for talking. I would too. Doesn't change the fact that it wasn't on purpose. Id guess if he was trying to hit him, swish talking only would have made him come back in there.
Azubuike24;1448919 wrote:The first one is just Chapman being Chapman. The guy doesn't know where it's going 10-20% of the time.
I don't think Chapman liked the whole "stood at the plate and stare him down until the next pitch."
The 1-0 pitch was clearly a message.
The 2-1 hack by Swisher was an attempt to show him up.
Great drama for true baseball fans.
Apparently, for one of them, it's because he's racist as fuck lolAzubuike24;1448930 wrote:Not sure what the Tribe fans are upset over. There probably should've been a warning issued, but this was just 2 gamers battling it out. I hate the Tribe, but Swisher is a guy I'd have his back if I was a teammate. Chapman is maybe the most important piece for the Reds, everyone is going to defend him.
Exactly. The 1-0 was intentional. The stare after the 0-0 was completely unnecessary. How many times in his career has Chapman's first pitch been WAY out of the zone. Almost always.Midstate01;1448935 wrote:I've gone back and watched it. Maybe he was trying to send message on 2nd pitch. I didnt Realize how much swish stared at him after the 1st pitch. No idea why though, it was high AND outside.
huh?SportsAndLady;1448933 wrote:When the other team's closer closes it down 1,2,3...just call him a N*****
lmao
september63;1448926 wrote:Rule of thumb in MLB. YOU dont throw 100MPH at a guys head. You wanna drill him? Anywhere but the head.
I look for the lead off batter for the Reds to get plunked tomorrow night.
Fucking this! If Swisher just chalks that first one up as Chapman just being Chapman and doesn't try to show him up...he doesn't get buzzed. Plain and simple.Ironman92;1448945 wrote:Another rule of thumb is that if the wild pitcher can throw over 100 mph.....it's best not to potentially piss him off by staring towards him when the previous pitch wasn't close to hitting anything.
If Choo gets hit and Chapman is in the game later....there will be a batter that wished Choo hadn't been hit.
Gimme a fucking break :rolleyes:sherm03;1448955 wrote:****ing this! If Swisher just chalks that first one up as Chapman just being Chapman and doesn't try to show him up...he doesn't get buzzed. Plain and simple.
A buddy of mine put it best...if Votto gets hit tomorrow, Chapman may end up putting Cabrera on the DL.
You don't think a 100mph fastball to the head could potentially put someone on the DL?vball10set;1448960 wrote:Gimme a fucking break :rolleyes:
sherm03;1448955 wrote:****ing this! If Swisher just chalks that first one up as Chapman just being Chapman and doesn't try to show him up...he doesn't get buzzed. Plain and simple.
A buddy of mine put it best...if Votto gets hit tomorrow, Chapman may end up putting Cabrera on the DL.
He has to hit 'em firstsherm03;1448963 wrote:You don't think a 100mph fastball to the head could potentially put someone on the DL?