To each his own, I guess.WebFire;1438816 wrote:I don't think people who already have a supplier they've been using for years are going to switch, especially if they have to pay additional tax.
If you have to worry about the purity you're buying from the wrong people.dlazz;1438819 wrote:To each his own, I guess.
I would want something that is legal and pure. If I have to pay $10 vs $8, I'll pay the $10.
Heh. Reps.sherm03;1438827 wrote:I hope it's legalized, because I'm really looking forward to a "Weed Snob" thread on here.
I think in WA employers can still fire/not hire those that fail a drug test. I have zero problem with a private company determining their own requirements for employment.friendfromlowry;1438830 wrote:Maybe this has already been discussed, but I'd be interested to see how it'd affect job hiring. The hospital partners I work for announced last Fall that they will now not hire anyone who smokes cigarettes. Granted that cigarettes have a lot more negative cardiovascular effects than marijuana.
queencitybuckeye;1437596 wrote:I'm assuming you're talking about recreational use (we disagree but so what). I'm still waiting for a rational explanation why a child who has life-threatening seizures can't legally have a treatment known to be effective.
Glory Days;1437705 wrote:got a scientific study to prove it? some parent giving pot to their kid and saying it works isnt scientific.
GOONx19;1438627 wrote:
Glory Days;1438689 wrote:I dont know much about Nabiximal but from what i have read it works about 50% of the time, isnt exactly marijuana and isnt supposed to get you high.
Boom.GOONx19;1438931 wrote:Nabiximols works the same way as marijuana. It stimulates cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 in the central nervous system and dorsal root ganglia as well as other site of the body. Peripheral CB2 receptors modulate immune function through cytokine release. Your initial post wasn't about getting a patient high, it was about whether or not it could reduce seizures. Stimulating these receptors does reduce seizures. You asked for a scientific study that proves this. I gave you one. This is a randomized, peer-reviewed, double-blind, controlled study. It's as high a level of evidence as you can get in medical literature. If you read it, instead of whatever else you've been reading, you'll see that is doesn't work only 50% of the time. There is a 98.8% reduction is spasm frequency when these receptors are stimulated, with a p-value of 0.005. This means that 99.5% of the time you will see this reduction in spasm frequency. The patient and the patient's caregivers should have the option to utilize this therapy if they so choose. Getting high is a potential side effect of more than just smoking weed.
Seriously? You are going to put everybody in this category? Alcohol and weed affects everybody the same?Classyposter58;1438972 wrote: Someone high is barely out of it, and usually more fun when they are while alcoholics are usually total dicks and dangerous behind the wheel. You don't feel like you are spinning in circles on weed
Pick6;1438947 wrote:This site wouldnt be so minor league if JIC cared 1/4th as much about it as he does about smoking pot legally.
Oh come on drunk guy is way worse than high guy. What's the dude that's baked gonna do? Eat all your cool ranch doritios?Pick6;1438973 wrote:Seriously? You are going to put everybody in this category? Alcohol and weed affects everybody the same?
I've Dutch ovened for less. Someone wants to eat the original? Cool. Mess w/my cool ranch and it's go time.Classyposter58;1438992 wrote:Oh come on drunk guy is way worse than high guy. What's the dude that's baked gonna do? Eat all your cool ranch doritios?
I find them both pretty annoying when I am sober.Classyposter58;1438992 wrote:Oh come on drunk guy is way worse than high guy. What's the dude that's baked gonna do? Eat all your cool ranch doritios?
Well there's your mistake.like_that;1439083 wrote:I find them both pretty annoying when I am sober.
i dont see how it wouldnt go up. you have to remember, big pharma is gonna get its hands on the deal. what about companies copyrighting the different combinations and blends etc? that would drive prices up.dlazz;1438797 wrote:You guys are also assuming that the price for weed would increase if it were legalized. The price is in its current ranges now because it is ILLEGAL. It would fall like a rock if it were legalized, and would very much likely be cheaper anyway even if they taxed the shit out of it.
Good luck with that. Theirs so many different strains available right now, no way every possible plant could be "copyrighted" and against general public to grow and have.Glory Days;1439278 wrote:what about companies copyrighting the different combinations and blends etc? that would drive prices up.
If this is the case the black market will remain alive and well.Glory Days;1439278 wrote:i dont see how it wouldnt go up. you have to remember, big pharma is gonna get its hands on the deal. what about companies copyrighting the different combinations and blends etc? that would drive prices up.
