like_that;1424138 wrote:I don't get my feelz hurt, so I don't see a problem with replying to posts directed at me. Typically the other poster ends up getting his feelz hurt.

As for the post LJ was address, I belive it was when i told QCB to GTFO. LF probably took it as a "YOU NEED TO GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE!" type post, when it was more of a "awww man get the fuck out." LJ didn't even consider the possibility of that though, and decided to attack based on an assumption.

Hey guys, glad we could have a civil, adult, non-aggressive discussion here without attacking others.

SnotBubbles;1424159 wrote:Why doesn't Justin email active former members and (with a brief survey) find out why they left? If the general feeling is that OC is nearing its demise because of lack of new membership and inactivity from current members...isn't that a good way to find out what's up? Certainly you have their registered email addresses.

Be like Domino's, listen to feedback from those that left...not the ones that stayed.

like_that;1424138 wrote:I don't get my feelz hurt, so I don't see a problem with replying to posts directed at me. Typically the other poster ends up getting his feelz hurt.

As for the post LJ was address, I belive it was when i told QCB to GTFO. LF probably took it as a "YOU NEED TO GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE!" type post, when it was more of a "awww man get the fuck out." LJ didn't even consider the possibility of that though, and decided to attack based on an assumption.

justincredible;1424156 wrote:I'd hardly call this an attack.

SnotBubbles;1424159 wrote:Why doesn't Justin email former members who were active and (with a brief survey) find out why they left? If the general feeling is that OC is nearing its demise because of lack of new membership and inactivity from current members...isn't that a good way to find out what's up? Certainly you have their registered email addresses.

Be like Domino's, listen to feedback from those that left...not the ones that stayed.

Pick6;1424165 wrote:good idea, but think Justin doesnt care enough to do it.

justincredible;1424161 wrote:Not a bad idea. In fact, it's a fucking great idea. I wonder what sort of response rate it would get, though.

justincredible;1424166 wrote:I said it was a great idea, actually. I will work on putting something together over the next few days.

like_that;1424168 wrote:Pics or gtfo.

like_that;1424168 wrote:Pics or gtfo.

SnotBubbles;1424171 wrote:What tone was that gtfo in?

like_that;1424172 wrote:But seriously, I am looking forward to what people like capone, sos, failhook, and crynasty say on these surveys :rolleyes:.

like_that;1424174 wrote:A playful one.

SnotBubbles;1424178 wrote:I thought so. Lower case gtfos seem playful, capital GTFOs seem excited....let's just keep those nasty bolded/capitalized GTFOs to a minimum. And don't EVER punctuate a bolded/capitalized GTFO with more than one exclamation point! #bant

Commander of Awesome;1424164 wrote:http://www.buzzfeed.com/jpmoore/what-if-sports-balls-were-replaced-by-cats


lolduke

LJ;1424179 wrote:Or you could just drop the GTFO altogether and just attack someone by calling them dramatic #realissue.

Curly J;1424176 wrote:Survey Says...Hurt Feelz !!! (Number 1 answer)

Commander of Awesome;1424183 wrote:Yeah you getting bent out of shape and reading into shit isn't the issue at all. Its us. :rolleyes:

Automatik;1424191 wrote:The early over/under on completed surveys submitted is at .5