ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jan 9, 2013 4:52pm
GoChiefs;1362072 wrote:But if he's allowed to get away with it at all, then you have to let like_that and CoA get away with it as well. You can't allow one to do something, and then infract someone else for doing the same thing. No matter how frequently they do it.
I was just saying that's what seems to have taken place to this point, not that it was right.
I mean, the other 2 have gotten away with murder up until today, so at least we've been consistent lol
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Jan 9, 2013 5:08pm
I think one problem is that lotz, CoA, and like_that are capable of posting rationally, so they end up with more leeway for some reason. Their problem is, they can't handle anyone disagreeing with them, and jump anyone that does.
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Jan 9, 2013 9:15pm
Didnt read everything here, but I think reporting a post and getting more than 1 opinion on an infraction might be the best way to go on all infractions from now on (obvious ones not withstanding). That way, at least more than 1 mod agreed and there is no "agenda" being pushed on any one poster by a mod.
NOTE: Not saying anyone has an agenda. But thats what they all think, so we can avoid that.
NOTE: Not saying anyone has an agenda. But thats what they all think, so we can avoid that.
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Jan 10, 2013 1:14pm
What happens when you report a post, but nobody see it for 8-10 hours, by then it's too late to infract.
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Jan 10, 2013 1:34pm
I understand why its important to infract right away, but at the same time I dont. If you break a rule you break a rule. Maybe dont infract for anything after that broken rule, as maybe they thought it was ok since it was standing for so long. But the person still broke the rule on the initial post and infracting right away or a week later wouldnt change that fact.se-alum;1362957 wrote:What happens when you report a post, but nobody see it for 8-10 hours, by then it's too late to infract.
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jan 11, 2013 8:33am
Here we go again in the browns thread...
Jordo posts something that is mostly true (fans didn't like Chud in 2008) CoA makes a comment because it was jordo, I tell him don't start that shit, S&L immediately shows up to backup CoA
There's nothing I can do because its all within our rules, which is frustrating as shit
Jordo posts something that is mostly true (fans didn't like Chud in 2008) CoA makes a comment because it was jordo, I tell him don't start that shit, S&L immediately shows up to backup CoA
There's nothing I can do because its all within our rules, which is frustrating as shit
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 11, 2013 8:53am
I believe that would fall within the "Don't continually harass other members" rule.
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Jan 11, 2013 8:53am
We don't have to like what people say. How else did isadore stay here for so long? I fucking hated that guy, but he pretty much never broke the rules.ts1227;1363611 wrote:Here we go again in the browns thread...
Jordo posts something that is mostly true (fans didn't like Chud in 2008) CoA makes a comment because it was jordo, I tell him don't start that shit, S&L immediately shows up to backup CoA
There's nothing I can do because its all within our rules, which is frustrating as shit
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 11, 2013 8:56am
ts is right though, it was completely unnecessary and uncalled for.O-Trap;1363628 wrote:We don't have to like what people say. How else did isadore stay here for so long? I fucking hated that guy, but he pretty much never broke the rules.
jordo212000;1363451 wrote:Didn't he get run out of town by fans when he was the OC a few years ago?
Commander of Awesome;1363542 wrote:Nice troll attempt, try again.
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Jan 11, 2013 8:58am
But allowed. I'm sure at some point, I've said something that someone else thought was "completely unnecessary and uncalled for." I probably felt differently, and I'm glad I was able to post it, regardless of their reservations.GoChiefs;1363632 wrote:ts is right though, it was completely unnecessary and uncalled for.
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 11, 2013 9:00am
But that's not the response you get every single time you post in a thread though. That is seriously CoA's reply to jordo everytime he says anything in the Browns thread, no matter what it is.O-Trap;1363635 wrote:But allowed. I'm sure at some point, I've said something that someone else thought was "completely unnecessary and uncalled for." I probably felt differently, and I'm glad I was able to post it, regardless of their reservations.
Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Jan 11, 2013 9:23am
Exactly, the difference is a one time response versus constantly doing it to the same person.
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Jan 11, 2013 9:34am
Fair enough. That could fall under constant harrassment of another poster.
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Jan 11, 2013 9:37am
This is becoming a joke.
With all the other shit that is said, done or posted on this site you want to infract this? Get over yourselves. There is absolutely nothing wrong with this post, nor like_that's post the other day.
With all the other shit that is said, done or posted on this site you want to infract this? Get over yourselves. There is absolutely nothing wrong with this post, nor like_that's post the other day.
O-Trap
Posts: 14,994
Jan 11, 2013 9:38am
Well, that was frosty.wildcats20;1363688 wrote:This is becoming a joke.
With all the other shit that is said, done or posted on this site you want to infract this? Get over yourselves. There is absolutely nothing wrong with this post, nor like_that's post the other day.
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Jan 11, 2013 9:43am
There was absolutely no reason to step in and say anything to coa. The thread moved on fine after his post, if anything it was the post telling him to stop that derailed it.
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 11, 2013 9:43am
It is bullshit that jordo can't post anything on that thread though without that douchebag being an asshole about it. I also don't agree with a lot of the other stuff that's spewed throughout that forum either though.wildcats20;1363688 wrote:This is becoming a joke.
With all the other shit that is said, done or posted on this site you want to infract this? Get over yourselves. There is absolutely nothing wrong with this post, nor like_that's post the other day.
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Jan 11, 2013 9:44am
GoChiefs;1363695 wrote:It is bullshit that jordo can't post anything on that thread though without that douchebag being an asshole about it. I also don't agree with a lot of the other stuff that's spewed throughout that forum either though.
Jordo deserves whatever comes his way with his past trolling. Want it to stop? Thread ban jordo.
Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Jan 11, 2013 9:44am
I haven't really responded to Wildcats20 before as it is easy to tell he's on the side that Cleveland fans should be able to harass whoever they want.
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Jan 11, 2013 9:46am
Fly4Fun;1363697 wrote:I haven't really responded to Wildcats20 before as it is easy to tell he's on the side that Cleveland fans should be able to harass whoever they want.
No. I'm on the side of this is a fucking internet message board. Why the fuck do you take it so damn serious?
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 11, 2013 9:46am
But what has he said on that thread that warrants a thread ban though? Trust me, I've looked. There isn't anything.wildcats20;1363696 wrote:Jordo deserves whatever comes his way with his past trolling. Want it to stop? Thread ban jordo.
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 11, 2013 9:47am
:thumbup:wildcats20;1363701 wrote:No. I'm on the side of this is a fucking internet message board. Why the fuck do you take it so damn serious?
Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Jan 11, 2013 9:50am
Exactly, it's an internet message board. Why do a few people take it so serious that they constantly are assholes to a few posters despite them posting harmless responses thus lowering the common denominator of acceptable behavior to the point posters leave (BR, TrueBlue, etc).
It's one thing to have a smart ass remark to a post when you actually post something that deserves it. It's another to have a person continually harass another regardless of what they post.
It's one thing to have a smart ass remark to a post when you actually post something that deserves it. It's another to have a person continually harass another regardless of what they post.
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Jan 11, 2013 9:52am
Fly4Fun;1363712 wrote:Exactly, it's an internet message board. Why do a few people take it so serious that they constantly are assholes to a few posters despite them posting harmless responses thus lowering the common denominator of acceptable behavior to the point posters leave (BR, TrueBlue, etc).
Why do you take it so serious to infract posts that aren't worth it?
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Jan 11, 2013 9:53am
Which post derailed the thread?
It wasn't coa's.
It wasn't coa's.