Infraction for like_that: Rules infraction

Moderator Discussion Backup 90 replies 326 views
GoChiefs's avatar
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 9, 2013 3:30pm
I'd say the general concensus between everyone is the CoA and like_that are pieces of shit. I'm not sure why some of the name calling isn't dealt with though.
wildcats20's avatar
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Jan 9, 2013 3:33pm
It's a bad infraction. It should reversed and the ban should be lifted.
GoChiefs's avatar
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 9, 2013 3:38pm
The only thing I hate is if it's reversed, there going to thing there bitching caused it to happen and they are going to thing they've "won" or something.
ts1227's avatar
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jan 9, 2013 3:43pm
And no one can sit here and honestly say his pattern of posting (especially of late) didn't warrant one, the straw that broke the camels back being flimsy notwithstanding.

To normal posters we look dumber reversing it because on the whole it was deserved. Their fellow shit stains will bitch for a few days, but it's a vocal minority.
justincredible's avatar
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Jan 9, 2013 3:43pm
I feel like I should update the rules to something simple.

1. Don't be a dick.
2. Don't post porn.
3. Don't swear in thread titles.
justincredible's avatar
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Jan 9, 2013 3:44pm
ts1227;1361984 wrote:And no one can sit here and honestly say his pattern of posting (especially of late) didn't warrant one, the straw that broke the camels back being flimsy notwithstanding.

To normal posters we look dumber reversing it because on the whole it was deserved. Their fellow shit stains will bitch for a few days, but it's a vocal minority.
Yeah, I don't disagree with this.
wildcats20's avatar
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Jan 9, 2013 3:44pm
ts1227;1361984 wrote:And no one can sit here and honestly say his pattern of posting (especially of late) didn't warrant one, the straw that broke the camels back being flimsy notwithstanding.

To normal posters we look dumber reversing it because on the whole it was deserved. Their fellow shit stains will bitch for a few days, but it's a vocal minority.

Normal posters don't respect anything mods say because of shit infractions like this.
se-alum's avatar
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Jan 9, 2013 3:45pm
Reversing it would be stupid, and I would never even bring up the idea of reversing another mods decision. Justin selected mods because he trusted their decision making. What's done is done, reversing it will only make things worse. It's not like he doesn't deserve some time in the Basement.
Fly4Fun's avatar
Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Jan 9, 2013 3:46pm
justincredible;1361985 wrote:I feel like I should update the rules to something simple.

1. Don't be a dick.
2. Don't post porn.
3. Don't swear in thread titles.
I agree that the point of the rules is trying to get at "don't be a dick". But there will always be an argument over where the line is drawn/what constitutes being a dick.

I think something along the lines of reminding people that it is fine to be a dick in the basement, just don't do it else where. I think we've been very lax recently with a few posters as far as their behavior outside the basement.
GoChiefs's avatar
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 9, 2013 3:48pm
wildcats20;1361988 wrote:Normal posters don't respect anything mods say because of shit infractions like this.
I think it's more so because of the lack of consistency in moderating.
Fly4Fun's avatar
Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Jan 9, 2013 3:49pm
GoChiefs;1361994 wrote:I think it's more so because of the lack of consistency in moderating.
And I think part of the lack of consistency is because no one wants to deal with the shit from the vocal minority that always happens.
GoChiefs's avatar
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 9, 2013 3:50pm
Fly4Fun;1361996 wrote:And I think part of the lack of consistency is because no one wants to deal with the shit from the vocal minority that always happens.
Eh, I don't think anyone that is a moderator gives a rats ass about what anyone else says, so I don't really buy into that.
GoChiefs's avatar
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 9, 2013 3:52pm
I do find it hilarious that CoA is bitching about it more than like_that is so far.
wildcats20's avatar
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Jan 9, 2013 3:53pm
GoChiefs;1361994 wrote:I think it's more so because of the lack of consistency in moderating.

Which is what I'm saying.

People can troll and name call and all other shit and get nothing.

Then we have this thread, which didn't need to be posted on by the mod. The thread was dead after coa posted what he did. Then comes a post that was pointless, fly4fun's.
GoChiefs's avatar
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 9, 2013 3:53pm
Just generally, whenever someone is given an infraction, it's at least discussed by a couple mods in the mod forum before it's given, unless it's an obvious infraction. I just think this could have been avoiding had there been a discussion about it first.
wildcats20's avatar
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Jan 9, 2013 3:54pm
GoChiefs;1362005 wrote:Just generally, whenever someone is given an infraction, it's at least discussed by a couple mods in the mod forum before it's given, unless it's an obvious infraction. I just think this could have been avoiding had there been a discussion about it first.

Aka the report feature
ts1227's avatar
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jan 9, 2013 3:55pm
I mean just look at the past 2 days at the vastly differing opinions on this between us all, of course we're wildly inconsistent.

You've got Fly (and me generally) on the strict interpretation side with them, on the other end wildcats apparently would prefer just giving them mod powers on the Browns thread, and everyone in between.
Fly4Fun's avatar
Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Jan 9, 2013 3:55pm
GoChiefs;1362000 wrote:Eh, I don't think anyone that is a moderator gives a rats ass about what anyone else says, so I don't really buy into that.
I don't think anyone is afraid or anything retarded like that. It's just if you do moderate a few select posters you then never hear the end of it.

As se poitns out, for some reason CoA and Like_that tend to get away with a lot.

It's one thing give an infraction to SoS, Tiernan, Isadore, people generally hated by everyone. It's another to give an infraction to one of the people in the little club that defends each other.
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 9, 2013 3:56pm
GoChiefs;1362002 wrote:I do find it hilarious that CoA is bitching about it more than like_that is so far.

Gotta protect his lady
GoChiefs's avatar
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 9, 2013 3:58pm
There's more posters that get away with just as much as like_that and CoA, such as Lotz, etc. I just think because you don't like the two of them, you pay more attention to what they do and don't get away with. There are others that give just as much shit as they do and nothing is done about it.
Fly4Fun's avatar
Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Jan 9, 2013 4:02pm
GoChiefs;1362014 wrote:There's more posters that get away with just as much as like_that and CoA, such as Lotz, etc. I just think because you don't like the two of them, you pay more attention to what they do and don't get away with. There are others that give just as much shit as they do and nothing is done about it.
I notice ti when CoA and like_that do it as often it's targeted towards me.

I tend to stay away from ND threads, so I don't notice Lotz's behavior for that reason. Generally the only times I go on ND threads if I'm directed there by a reported post complaining about tiernan or sleeper.

But in general (can't recall any specifics) I have noticed Lotz has been more hostile lately.
GoChiefs's avatar
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 9, 2013 4:09pm
What's the over/under on how long it takes before mcburg jumps on CoA's coat tails in the thread and bitches about the moderating as well?
wildcats20's avatar
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Jan 9, 2013 4:15pm
Fly4Fun;1362022 wrote:I notice ti when CoA and like_that do it as often it's targeted towards me.

I tend to stay away from ND threads, so I don't notice Lotz's behavior for that reason. Generally the only times I go on ND threads if I'm directed there by a reported post complaining about tiernan or sleeper.

But in general (can't recall any specifics) I have noticed Lotz has been more hostile lately.

Then why post on a thread that you admittedly had no interest in talking about?
ts1227's avatar
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Jan 9, 2013 4:34pm
GoChiefs;1362014 wrote:There's more posters that get away with just as much as like_that and CoA, such as Lotz, etc. I just think because you don't like the two of them, you pay more attention to what they do and don't get away with. There are others that give just as much shit as they do and nothing is done about it.

Lotz has his moments, but on his worst day he's nowhere remotely close to the level of CoA/LT. I'd suspect lotz gets away with it more because it's not constant (in fact it's not very often) with him
GoChiefs's avatar
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Jan 9, 2013 4:45pm
ts1227;1362065 wrote:Lotz has his moments, but on his worst day he's nowhere remotely close to the level of CoA/LT. I'd suspect lotz gets away with it more because it's not constant (in fact it's not very often) with him
But if he's allowed to get away with it at all, then you have to let like_that and CoA get away with it as well. You can't allow one to do something, and then infract someone else for doing the same thing. No matter how frequently they do it.