lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Apr 27, 2013 12:49pm
Sounds we got the Steelers 3rd rounder next year to swap picks this round.

Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Apr 27, 2013 12:50pm
Hmm.. Wait til next year!
Not really a fan. But hopefully they have a good idea on something we dont. Like Evans or Rambo sliding.
Not really a fan. But hopefully they have a good idea on something we dont. Like Evans or Rambo sliding.

Dr. KnOiTaLL
Posts: 2,682
Apr 27, 2013 12:50pm
Do we still get the Steelers 4th rounder this year too?Mulva;1434873 wrote:I'll take it.

Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Apr 27, 2013 12:50pm
Oh sorry. Didnt realize they swapped as well.
S
slingshot4ever
Posts: 4,085
Apr 27, 2013 12:52pm
We didn't move back apparently. Just gave up our 4th for next years 3rd

ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Apr 27, 2013 12:52pm
Steelers are still showing as picking 118th. Looks like it was this year's pick for next year third round.lhslep134;1434875 wrote:Sounds we got the Steelers 3rd rounder next year to swap picks this round.

Dr. KnOiTaLL
Posts: 2,682
Apr 27, 2013 12:52pm
It's not looking like we swapped...?
S
slingshot4ever
Posts: 4,085
Apr 27, 2013 12:52pm
Wronghoops23;1434874 wrote:Basically swapped 111 for 115 and a 3rd next season.
S
slingshot4ever
Posts: 4,085
Apr 27, 2013 12:53pm
Wronglhslep134;1434875 wrote:Sounds we got the Steelers 3rd rounder next year to swap picks this round.

Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Apr 27, 2013 12:53pm
meh. Guess I wasnt wrong.
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Apr 27, 2013 12:54pm
Welp, looks like it was just a 1 for 1 trade
scoreboard
Posts: 326
Apr 27, 2013 12:57pm
Wow they took Landry Jones

hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Apr 27, 2013 12:57pm
Sorry chief, just going by what was originally reported on twitter and shit...slingshot4ever;1434883 wrote:Wrong

Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Apr 27, 2013 12:57pm
Giving up a 3rd to swap picks wouldn't have made any sense. Maybe if this was the late first. Not in the 4th round.
Steelers take Landry Jones.
Steelers take Landry Jones.

Mr Miyagi
Posts: 1,211
Apr 27, 2013 1:00pm
We must not have anymore holes to fill this year

iclfan2
Posts: 6,360
Apr 27, 2013 1:03pm
We also gave up the 5th from San Fran and got a 7th. Still not bad, only try slot guy we have, and averages 60 some catches a yearlike_that;1434835 wrote:Anyway, I like the pick. I was pissed when I heard the bess trade was official, but when I saw that we just swapped spots I was pretty pleased.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Apr 27, 2013 1:04pm
What exactly was the trade between the Steelers and the Brownies?
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Apr 27, 2013 1:07pm
Their third rounder next year for our 4th rounder this yearvball10set;1434893 wrote:What exactly was the trade between the Steelers and the Brownies?
S
Sonofanump
Apr 27, 2013 1:10pm
Why trade out when Barrett from Alabama is on the board?

Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
Apr 27, 2013 1:14pm
Mr Miyagi;1434891 wrote:We must not have anymore holes to fill this year
Or they think they can get their guy in the 5th which is my guess

mucalum49
Posts: 1,639
Apr 27, 2013 1:15pm
Kind of my thoughts too. He would have been a nice, versatile lineman to have on the team.Sonofanump;1434897 wrote:Why trade out when Barrett from Alabama is on the board?

Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Apr 27, 2013 1:16pm
I don't think they've ever really planned on winning this year. Plug a few holes, see how it goes, try to patch up the rest next year. Still going to have plenty of cap space to make moves.Mr Miyagi;1434891 wrote:We must not have anymore holes to fill this year
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Apr 27, 2013 1:17pm
Are you saying this as a response to trading our 4th round pick? If you are, give me a f*cking break that's stupid.Mulva;1434901 wrote:I don't think they've ever really planned on winning this year.

Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Apr 27, 2013 1:18pm
No, I'm saying that in response to the post I quoted.lhslep134;1434902 wrote:Are you saying this as a response to trading our 4th round pick? If you are, give me a f*cking break that's stupid.
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Apr 27, 2013 1:41pm
So, yes. Because the post you quoted was about us trading our pick.Mulva;1434903 wrote:No, I'm saying that in response to the post I quoted.