gut;1352550 wrote:What ramifications? Errors are part of the game. Most people, especially those who play, get that. And that's why Buckner said he really doesn't understand why that became such an iconic choke. So for all the hyperbole and exagerration, not that big of a deal for the guy it ACTUALLY happened to.
What ramifications? Perhaps Buckner is asking the same thing, which would be the only reason he wouldn't get why it became so iconic. The ramifications to the team were that his error resulted in them losing the game in the immediate, and the series in the long term. The ramifications to him? Public scrutiny that was FAR beyond what a normal player would have experienced in his tenure playing the "game." Death threats, being heckled and booed by his own fans, being associated with a "curse," going down in history as having your very name associated foremost with a mistake, zero privacy for him or his family, paparazzi everywhere wanting to talk to you about you committing the most costly error in your career ...
Yeah, I don't see ramifications at all. What's a few death threats, after all?
gut;1352550 wrote:It's not the end of the world, nor would it end a guy's career.
Of course not. As of yet, not even the most egregious mistakes have been the "end of the world." Hell, many have not even been the end of his/her career (see the last few decades of presidents and/or congressmen). Doesn't mean they don't keep anyone up at night, and it certainly doesn't mean that personal wealth makes you feel better about it.
gut;1352550 wrote:In the REAL world, a doctor or lawyer screws up bad and they need to find a new career.
In some cases, perhaps. In MOST cases, it doesn't.
gut;1352550 wrote:Other people make multi-million dollar mistakes in business and they will be struggling to find a new job.
Again, you're trying to associate a monetary value to the mistake, as though the amount is necessarily relevant. If I made a five-figure mistake at my last job, I would have been fired on the spot. A few employers ago, they wouldn't have so much as batted an eye at a five figure mistake. The financial amount you're trying to associate with it is of no value to the conversation, because it's completely subjective.
gut;1352550 wrote:It's laughable that people think booting a ball is some life-altering, tragic obstacle that is difficult to overcome.
If you still think that's what I'm saying, then you're missing my point. The action in a vacuum was not what would keep someone up at night. Everyone makes errors. That's the part of the "shit happens" part you were discussing.
However, context gives it added relevance. It wasn't just an error. It was an error in a World Series game that the Sox could have won the series with that allowed the game-winning run while playing for a team that already had talk of a "curse" surrounding it. It was followed by personal and familial interference (death threats not being the least of them) as well as professional ridicule. He kept his job, but you can't even argue that he wasn't a punchline in his profession for quite awhile.
gut;1352550 wrote:It's the essence of hyperbole. It's a game, and booting a ball just doesn't register that high on the adveristy scale in the game of life.
There's that vacuum, again. If we remove all relevant context, you're absolutely correct. However, no professional, athlete or otherwise, has the luxury of doing their job in a vacuum. Costing your team the game and series after a long drought, regardless of whether or not it's an error on defense, a pitcher's hanging curveball hit over the wall, or a strikeout at the plate, is not the same as doing any of those things in seemingly meaningless scenarios. In meaningless scenarios, you're not going to feel like you've let anyone down that you care about. But that's context for you.
gut;1352550 wrote:Like I said, if that's the worst thing that ever happened to Buckner saying you feel sorry for him or that the millions he made playing the game aren't worth it is, quite frankly, insulting to many people.
Actually, the way your saying it, you make the problems of regular people seem trivial, because apparently, they're shallow enough problems that they can just be solves by throwing money at them.
I'd like to think that the things I consider problems are a little more complex than that, and that no amount of money just magically makes them better.
gut;1352550 wrote:I'd much rather live with that "humiliation" than the real pain and anxiety that comes from having to lay people off or fire them.
Apples and oranges. Both are professional struggles, and I don't see any reason to trivialize one by using the other.
gut;1352550 wrote:Cry me a fucking river. Athletes screwing up aren't remotely on the same plan as when many of the rest of us screw up, with hundreds even thousands of lives as collateral damage.
Just how many people in this country do you ACTUALLY think have enough influence in our jobs that our immediate actions affect hundreds or thousands of lives? Politicians and CEOs, perhaps.
And the beauty of when you or I screw up at work, even in a way that gets us fired, is that we can go on in obscurity, not having to have our lives picked through by everyone, not being a top-10 joke on David Letterman, and not having that kind of screw up named after us nationwide.
If you quietly do 100 things right, but one thing wrong that costs your organization in a really big way, do you honestly think that one mistake isn't going to matter? That you're going to just be able to shrug it off? Especially if you actually take pride in your job?
Don't get me wrong. If someone is doing what they do FOR the money, then I can see why money would trump any professional blunders, mishaps, or chew-outs. I, however, take pride in my job, so I suppose I can't relate to that, and it genuinely bothers me when I even make a mistake small enough for only my boss to call me out on it, let alone if I was to cost the entire company something because of it on a national stage. And a million dollars won't change that.