I've Seen Enough of Brandon Weeden

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Pro Sports ▸ I've Seen Enough of Brandon Weeden
Q

queencitybuckeye

Senior Member

7,117 posts
Nov 20, 2012 10:19 AM
Fine, you win. Draft a QB every year, because no quarterback in the league has ever developed over time, all the good ones were instant stars.
Nov 20, 2012 10:19am
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Nov 20, 2012 10:21 AM
queencitybuckeye;1325801 wrote:Fine, you win. Draft a QB every year, because no quarterback in the league has ever developed over time, all the good ones were instant stars.
Peyton Manning lit it up his rookie year with 28 interceptions !
Nov 20, 2012 10:21am
Raw Dawgin' it's avatar

Raw Dawgin' it

Just Ain't Care

11,466 posts
Nov 20, 2012 10:22 AM
Ravens won the superbowl with Dilfer. Bears got there with sexy Rexy.
Nov 20, 2012 10:22am
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Nov 20, 2012 10:24 AM
Raw Dawgin' it;1325805 wrote:Ravens won the superbowl with Dilfer. Bears got there with sexy Rexy.
Exception, not the rule.
Nov 20, 2012 10:24am
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Nov 20, 2012 10:25 AM
Raw Dawgin' it;1325805 wrote:Ravens won the superbowl with Dilfer. Bears got there with sexy Rexy.
I'll be surprised if a game manager QB ever wins another Super Bowl. I think Weeden can be more than a game manager but it would be nice if they could run the ball a little more and not have him slinging it 40x's a game.
Nov 20, 2012 10:25am
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Nov 20, 2012 10:25 AM
Raw Dawgin' it;1325805 wrote:Ravens won the superbowl with Dilfer. Bears got there with sexy Rexy.
And historically great defenses.
Nov 20, 2012 10:25am
Pick6's avatar

Pick6

A USA American

14,946 posts
Nov 20, 2012 10:30 AM
BR1986FB;1325810 wrote:I'll be surprised if a game manager QB ever wins another Super Bowl. I think Weeden can be more than a game manager but it would be nice if they could run the ball a little more and not have him slinging it 40x's a game.
TRich has averaged 25.6 carries and 107.3ypg the past 3 games.

edit: and has the 8th most attempts in the NFL.
Nov 20, 2012 10:30am
Raw Dawgin' it's avatar

Raw Dawgin' it

Just Ain't Care

11,466 posts
Nov 20, 2012 10:40 AM
SportsAndLady;1325811 wrote:And historically great defenses.
Or a really good run game like when Seattle went. You don't need a world beater QB, but you definitely need someone who won't cost you games.
Nov 20, 2012 10:40am
Crimson streak's avatar

Crimson streak

Senior Member

9,002 posts
Nov 20, 2012 11:04 AM
we should do what s&l thinks and draft a qb top 5 every year till we find a qb
/ sarcasm

Honestly that is the dumbest shit I have ever heard. It really is
Nov 20, 2012 11:04am
R

raiderbuck

Senior Member

1,623 posts
Nov 20, 2012 11:12 AM
I'm with BR. I really don't see how drafting another QB solves anything. In fact, we've had what like 12 different QBs to start for us since 1999? How does drafting another QB any different than what we've been doing?

Isn't that in itself the definition of insanity?

Stick with Weeden. Get him an actual target to throw the frickin' ball to. Luck has Reggie Wayne, RG3 has Santana Moss and Garcon (when he's healthy). Hell, Cam Newton has Steve Smith and Greg Olsen. The QB carousel is not the answer.
Nov 20, 2012 11:12am
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Nov 20, 2012 11:29 AM
raiderbuck;1325841 wrote:I'm with BR. I really don't see how drafting another QB solves anything. In fact, we've had what like 12 different QBs to start for us since 1999? How does drafting another QB any different than what we've been doing?

Isn't that in itself the definition of insanity?

Stick with Weeden. Get him an actual target to throw the frickin' ball to. Luck has Reggie Wayne, RG3 has Santana Moss and Garcon (when he's healthy). Hell, Cam Newton has Steve Smith and Greg Olsen. The QB carousel is not the answer.
Bingo! Browns haven't had a QB start in back-to-back season openers since when?
Nov 20, 2012 11:29am
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Nov 20, 2012 11:33 AM
Weeden has Gordon who is better than Moss or Garcon.
Nov 20, 2012 11:33am
shook_17's avatar

shook_17

Senior Member

3,023 posts
Nov 20, 2012 11:36 AM
SportsAndLady;1325798 wrote:Its not stupid. Hes shown no hope that he'll be anything more than an average QB. Why would we stick with that?

Congrats br u found the one person that actually agrees with u right now.
Lol weren't all you guys saying this same bullshit with McCoy? Well we know he's not the answer but everyone wanted to stick with McCoy another year. That makes me lol. Weeden has shown glimpse that he can be a winning qb. Weeden has better tools than McCoy but we are ready to throw weeden to the curb after gen game but were willing to keep McCoy after 20 some games bc we haven't seen enough. What joke.
Nov 20, 2012 11:36am
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Nov 20, 2012 11:36 AM
The Browns still need an impact LB. Until we get that, might as well just throw in the towel.
Nov 20, 2012 11:36am
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Nov 20, 2012 11:37 AM
sleeper;1325858 wrote:Weeden has Gordon who is better than Moss or Garcon.
Very debateable. Gordon has really proven nothing. He's had a few good games but his route running is suspect. Moss & Garcon at least have a track record.
Nov 20, 2012 11:37am
shook_17's avatar

shook_17

Senior Member

3,023 posts
Nov 20, 2012 11:38 AM
sleeper;1325858 wrote:Weeden has Gordon who is better than Moss or Garcon.
Lol you can not be serious. Right now Id take garcon over Gordon. Gordon's potential is higher j think but wtf come on now. When garcon is healthy he can ball
Nov 20, 2012 11:38am
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Nov 20, 2012 11:39 AM
BR1986FB;1325863 wrote:Very debateable. Gordon has really proven nothing. He's had a few good games but his route running is suspect. Moss & Garcon at least have a track record.
Gordon would have a track record too if he wasn't a rookie. Garcon is overrated; he was only good because he had Peyton Manning throwing him the ball. Santana moss isn't even a top 20 WR.
Nov 20, 2012 11:39am
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Nov 20, 2012 11:39 AM
shook_17;1325865 wrote:Lol you can not be serious. Right now Id take garcon over Gordon. Gordon's potential is higher j think but wtf come on now. When garcon has Peyton Manning he can ball
Fixed.
Nov 20, 2012 11:39am
Crimson streak's avatar

Crimson streak

Senior Member

9,002 posts
Nov 20, 2012 11:41 AM
sleeper;1325867 wrote:Gordon would have a track record too if he wasn't a rookie. Garcon is overrated; he was only good because he had Peyton Manning throwing him the ball. Santana moss isn't even a top 20 WR.

Actually garçon had his best year last year with Curtis painter as his qb
Nov 20, 2012 11:41am
T

thavoice

Senior Member

14,376 posts
Nov 20, 2012 11:45 AM
I am so confident that the steelers lose this one that I am awaiting the vbookie to open for this game and will put all 27,000 vdollars on the brownies to win.

As I told a buddy today....the only way the steelers win is if Cleveland pulls a cleveland!
Nov 20, 2012 11:45am
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Nov 20, 2012 11:47 AM
Crimson streak;1325873 wrote:Actually garçon had his best year last year with Curtis painter as his qb
Product of a system.
Nov 20, 2012 11:47am
shook_17's avatar

shook_17

Senior Member

3,023 posts
Nov 20, 2012 11:56 AM
Stop making excuses. You made an idiotic statement.
Nov 20, 2012 11:56am
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Nov 20, 2012 12:02 PM
shook_17;1325861 wrote:Lol weren't all you guys saying this same bullshit with McCoy? Well we know he's not the answer but everyone wanted to stick with McCoy another year. That makes me lol. Weeden has shown glimpse that he can be a winning qb. Weeden has better tools than McCoy but we are ready to throw weeden to the curb after gen game but were willing to keep McCoy after 20 some games bc we haven't seen enough. What joke.
We said stick with McCoy after it was obvious rg3 and luck were not a possibility and that Weeden would probably be our pick. What the fuck is the point?
Nov 20, 2012 12:02pm
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Nov 20, 2012 12:06 PM
shook_17;1325888 wrote:Stop making excuses. You made an idiotic statement.
Garcon isn't good. The only reason people like him is that he's a "local" boy. He sucks; average WR at best.
Nov 20, 2012 12:06pm
Pick6's avatar

Pick6

A USA American

14,946 posts
Nov 20, 2012 12:30 PM
I find it quite funny that the pro-Weeden group thinks we should give Weeden better weapons, while it was absurd to bring that up last year when people, like myself, were saying the same thing last year with McCoy.
Nov 20, 2012 12:30pm