I never said that I hadn't heard of him, I said that he wasn't being mentioned in the Heisman discussion prior to the 'Bama game.LJ;1338730 wrote:He went by Johnny Football way before the Bama game. Also, anyone who truly follows college football knew about him way before the bama game. He had 557 total yards and 4 td against Ark in Sept.
WebFire;1338737 wrote:So he has NBC to thank for the invite?
Yes, Denard did help. No question there.karen lotz;1338740 wrote:ABC had 4 of them. Can also give an assist to Denard.
WebFire;1338737 wrote:So he has NBC to thank for the invite?
karen lotz;1338736 wrote:He had two bad games prior to Bama, which cost his team wins. You know about those? Were you paying attention?
He had a 76% completion rate and 0 turnovers in the loss to UF. How did he cost his team a win?karen lotz;1338736 wrote:He had two bad games prior to Bama, which cost his team wins. You know about those? Were you paying attention?
Well I failed then.Crimson streak;1338743 wrote:Only 2 of them were on NBC so nice try.
LJ;1338747 wrote:He had a 76% completion rate and 0 turnovers in the loss to UF. How did he cost his team a win?
I can agree with that.sherm03;1338724 wrote:I don't think it's just because of the fact that he went to ND, but rather the fact that ND played 6 games in prime time this year on National TV, and Te'o had big plays in all of those games.
It's tougher to get noticed when you are up against everyone else at the 3:30 spot. When you're the only game on, it's easier to get the bigger audience. And if you come up big in those situations, it goes a long way.
You obviously think he wont the Heisman off of 1 game, when you don't even know that wasn't his best performance of the season. You also seem to think that the media made up the Johnny Football name. I'm not sure you had ever seen him before the Bama game.vball10set;1338739 wrote:I never said that I hadn't heard of him, I said that he wasn't being mentioned in the Heisman discussion prior to the 'Bama game.
btw, Arkansas??? lol
jordo212000;1338720 wrote:Good season. But not much different then a number of other LBs this year. If you invite him, you have to invite 3 other LBs as well
LJ;1338747 wrote:He had a 76% completion rate and 0 turnovers in the loss to UF. How did he cost his team a win?
That was also his first ever game starting. The defense is also the one that UF scored on.karen lotz;1338762 wrote:He led the offense to 65 yards in the second half. Also since you brought up his completion%, he averaged 5.8 yards on his throws, meaning mostly short safe (read: easy) passes. Heisman numbers? His team played 5 teams with winning records and lost two. Impressive!
NOW you want to bring up stats?Heisman numbers?
karen lotz;1338762 wrote:lol
I bring it up because that's the only argument you and jordo have. He had better numbers!!!!! Of course a QB in a system like that is going to put up numbers.LJ;1338764 wrote:That was also his first ever game starting. The defense is also the one that UF scored on.
NOW you want to bring up stats?
jordo212000;1338750 wrote:Lol
And Alabama, and Missouri and Mississippi State and Ole Miss!! LOLkaren lotz;1338767 wrote:I bring it up because that's the only argument you and jordo have. He had better numbers!!!!! Of course a QB in a system like that is going to put up numbers.
So when I show you where his numbers are inflated against teams like Sam Houston State and Louisiana Tech, I LOL.
karen lotz;1338767 wrote:I bring it up because that's the only argument you and jordo have. He had better numbers!!!!! Of course a QB in a system like that is going to put up numbers.
So when I show you where his numbers are inflated against teams like Sam Houston State and Louisiana Tech, I LOL.
lol, wtf have you been drinking? Read my post, and then read it again. I said he wasn't in the discussion prior to the 'Bama game, and I never said that that was his best game or it wasn't. I never said the media made up the nickname, only that he was a product of the overhyping of it. Last but not least, please, don't embarass yourself any further by pretending to know who I've watched or haven't watched. Now, back to your cocktail, you obviously need another one.LJ;1338754 wrote:You obviously think he wont the Heisman off of 1 game, when you don't even know that wasn't his best performance of the season. You also seem to think that the media made up the Johnny Football name. I'm not sure you had ever seen him before the Bama game.
Your posts make it pretty obvious what you know and you don't know, they also make it pretty obvious that you knew nothing about him prior to Bama.vball10set;1338771 wrote:lol, wtf have you been drinking? Read my post, and then read it again. I said he wasn't in the discussion prior to the 'Bama game, and I never said that that was his best game or it wasn't. I never said the media made up the nickname, only that he was a product of the overhyping of it. Last but not least, please, don't embarass yourself any further by pretending to know who I've watched or haven't watched. Now, back to your cocktail.
killer_ewok;1338760 wrote:Again, I was asking a question and got a reply that didn't answer it. Not sure what your point was but apparently you missed mine.
Anybody know where this ranks in terms of margin of victory?
See Tebow, Tim...are you really that dense? do you even watch college football outside of OSU games??LJ;1338775 wrote:Your posts make it pretty obvious what you know and you don't know, they also make it pretty obvious that you knew nothing about him prior to Bama.
And
"only that he was a product of the overhyping of it"
What the **** does that mean?
I'll give you Alabama and maybe MSU. And I'll throw in Auburn, Arkansas, SMU, and South Carolina STATE.LJ;1338769 wrote:And Alabama, and Missouri and Mississippi State and Ole Miss!! LOL
