like_that;1319990 wrote:Looks like Petraeus is still going to testify regarding Benzaghi. Unfortunately the liberal media will paint his words as tainted if it hurts Obama. The same media that slobs on Clinton's penis.

QuakerOats;1319955 wrote:Was this situation being held over General P in return for favorable testimony re Benghazi?

TedSheckler;1320020 wrote:Krauthammer said so.

ptown_trojans_1;1319978 wrote:Uhhh no. Unless you have evidence to point to that conclusion, no.

And he will still testify in the coming weeks.

QuakerOats;1320028 wrote:I was just asking the question.

And the question was not whether he would testify, the question was whether the government would look to extort favorable testimony from him in return for suppressing his personal problem.

majorspark;1320052 wrote:Shame on you for even asking such a question. Never question the benevolence of government. It only seeks to deliver truth to the people. The corrupt, self centered, and greedy only reside in big corporations. Big government is your friend.

QuakerOats;1320127 wrote:And we are moments away from another news conference wherein the complicit media will continue to run interference for the obama regime and soak up their message like dutiful little soldiers. What an insidious little group of grovelers.

isadore;1320369 wrote:gosh a ruddies boy we sure get an overflow of paranoia and self pity from the opponents of our first African American President.

Manhattan Buckeye;1320376 wrote:Well you know the old saying: Republicans are evil and hate everyone that doesn't look like them. Democrats are stupid and can't even agree with themselves.

The latter has been proven true over the last couple of days. At what point is this incompetence intolerable?

isadore;1320410 wrote:gosh lets see January 2001-January 2009 that was intolerable incompetence.

Manhattan Buckeye;1320415 wrote:Yeah, that was intolerable. We actually had sub 6% unemployment and economic growth. I forgot how horrible it was to be economically progressive.

gosh a ruddies give me more of that '09-'12 economy!

Idiocy.

gut;1320419 wrote:And it hasn't gotten any better. A robust recovery should have been a slam dunk, but Obama keeps kicking it in the nuts. Then he looks over and sees the poor and middle class doubled over in pain, and his solution is to keep kicking the economy in the nuts. Still doubled over in pain, so more kicking. One wonders at what point he makes the connection.

isadore;1320422 wrote:gosh a ruddies 2 wars conducted incompetently, one disaster relief conducted incompetently, one collapsed financial system caused by incompetence, and an economy pushed into the most rapid fall in 70 years because of governmental incompetence, and all this mess handed off to his successor, our First African American President.

Manhattan Buckeye;1320424 wrote:Are you talking about W or Obama?

isadore;1320423 wrote:as observed looking through the jaded lense of the 1% and their acolytes.

gut;1320428 wrote:As observed looking through the lenses of education and experience, something the takers don't possess. Now THAT is something I wish I could give them.

isadore;1320443 wrote:no, you supply the commentary of those who benefited from the policies that gave us an increasingly a mal distribution of wealth, stratified class system, disappearing middle class. And now Romney defeat has stopped you from getting more of the same.

gut;1320452 wrote:The growing wealth gap is a global, so you might want to re-think which policies are helping and hurting because the issue is hardly confined to the US.

And I'm not a 1%er. I aspire to be, it's too bad the 47% apparently don't aspire to be productive tax payers.

Like I said, keep rooting for Obama to kick the economy in the nuts. It appears you enjoy the feeling.

isadore;1320498 wrote:A tax policy started with Reagan, support for outsourcing, no serious attempt to provide post secondary education, deregulation of corporation. All helping to stratify our nation.