tk421;1314532 wrote:there isn't going to be a clear winner for days, all these states being called without counting the votes is stupid.
Allowing provisional ballots that take 10 days to count does not even make good sense
tk421;1314532 wrote:there isn't going to be a clear winner for days, all these states being called without counting the votes is stupid.
Ha it's still crazy how close Florida is. I mean 600 votes out of 7 Million is purely nutsgut;1314539 wrote:Jesus....Wolfblitzer having a pollgasm. Calm down, most people want not part of a recount regardless of who wins.
I wonder what, if any, advantage Romney would get from military and overseas ballotsClassyposter58;1314541 wrote:Ha it's still crazy how close Florida is. I mean 600 votes out of 7 Million is purely nuts
Getting it right is way more important than getting the results quickly I don't need to know who wins tonight. Nothing will change if I do. I do, however, need to know that it was counted and granted to the correct candidate.tk421;1314540 wrote:that's what I'm saying, there's got to be an easier electronic way to do all this. Counting ballots a week plus after an election is crazy in this day and age.
probably more than Obama, when those are counted. Military is pretty R, isn't it?gut;1314543 wrote:I wonder what, if any, advantage Romney would get from military and overseas ballots
He is fucked without Ohio....plain and simplejordo212000;1314545 wrote:Without Ohio it is going to be very difficult for Romney to win. Without Ohio he needs Colorado and it isn't looking good out there
For the most part.tk421;1314546 wrote:probably more than Obama, when those are counted. Military is pretty R, isn't it?
I don't have one. And I'm saying it maybe needs changed. But I am pointing out why a simple online voting system could be dangerous.tk421;1314536 wrote:so, what's your solution then? Keep the same old system with delays and all the other problems? This is the 21st century and we are voting like it's 1920.
I think New Hampshire was just called for Obama.jordo212000;1314545 wrote:Without Ohio it is going to be very difficult for Romney to win. Without Ohio he needs Colorado and it isn't looking good out there
Neither can win really without Ohio. If Mitt wins Florida then it all rests on the Buckeye state's shouldersIggyPride00;1314552 wrote:I think New Hampshire was just called for Obama.
Without Ohio Romney has no path to 270. It is all on Ohio at this point with Michigan/Wisky/Penn off the table.
Tie is a win for Romney because the House then chooses. His VP would be Biden though, as the Senate picks it.majorspark;1314554 wrote:Without Ohio Romney's last hope would be a tie. This would be a 269-269 tie scenario.