Ty Webb;1298436 wrote:I'm not trying to start trouble here...but I honestly don't see a path to victory for Romney here in Ohio. I'll tell you guys...I'm an intern for the Obama campaign and I have access to internal polls,and I just don't see how Romney can win Ohio

And gut....I could same the same for you,but replace Mathews with Hannity,and me with Quaker

Four years ago, Democrats made up about 42% of the early and absentee vote while Republicans made up 22% - a dismal 20-point deficit that contributed to Sen. John McCain's defeat in Ohio.
Through Wednesday, however, the margin has narrowed: Democrats account for 36% of the early and absentee vote while Republicans make up for 29%.

Ty Webb;1298436 wrote:I'm not trying to start trouble here...but I honestly don't see a path to victory for Romney here in Ohio. I'll tell you guys...I'm an intern for the Obama campaign and I have access to internal polls,and I just don't see how Romney can win Ohio

And gut....I could same the same for you,but replace Mathews with Hannity,and me with Quaker

gut;1298458 wrote:Says the guy who doesn't realize he's a schill for the Obama propaganda.

I nailed it, didn't I? Must be pretty sobering to come to the realization how you'e being used, and how disappointed and shocked you will be in a few weeks.

I Wear Pants;1298445 wrote: It's possible to think the country isn't doing wonderfully and also think that Obama is the better choice between the two major candidates.

ZWICK 4 PREZ;1298455 wrote:and Colorado

Ty Webb;1298461 wrote:Not even close....

gut;1298453 wrote:And what is the point, really, of constantly hammering people with polling data? Why would anyone skew a poll or ignore bias? Why do these new polls from sources unknown pop-up all the time?

The only thing they hope to accomplish is to discourage or demoralize potential voters for the opposition. That's why Ty Webb is on here on a nearly daily basis with marching orders to promote the latest favorable Obama poll. He's a volunteer schill.

gut;1298413 wrote:Anyway, on election night:

11:35pm CNN calls it for Romney
11:36pm Chris Matthews commits suicide.
11:38pm Ty posts a poll predicting an Obama landslide.

gut;1298467 wrote:I don't think anyone supports Obama because they think he is better. They support the Democratic party or believe in the liberal platform. I've said repeatedly liberals ignore the journey and transition for what they think is a better end game. So for them the choice of a proven failure vs. a potential failure is irrelevant. Their path forward is a liberal, no matter how much damage it causes in the interim.

I mean, Obama is an unequivocal failure who has put forward no plan for turning things around. And, by the way, he took office as the economy was stabilizing and bottoming, with record low interest rates, accomodative monetary policy, record deficit spending and the results are STILL worse than mediocre.

gut;1298467 wrote:I don't think anyone supports Obama because they think he is better. They support the Democratic party or believe in the liberal platform. I've said repeatedly liberals ignore the journey and transition for what they think is a better end game. So for them the choice of a proven failure vs. a potential failure is irrelevant. Their path forward is a liberal, no matter how much damage it causes in the interim.

I mean, Obama is an unequivocal failure who has put forward no plan for turning things around. And, by the way, he took office as the economy was stabilizing and bottoming, with record low interest rates, accomodative monetary policy, record deficit spending and the results are STILL worse than mediocre.

I Wear Pants;1298470 wrote:As opposed to the Republican method of trying to make it so people literally cannot vote.

Ty Webb;1298475 wrote:You have now become the most clueless poster here...you have overtaken Quaker...

ZWICK 4 PREZ;1298471 wrote:I vote Republican b/c I think privatizing everything is a really great idea with no risks whatsoever.

Especially since no ones investments tanked 4 years ago.

gut;1298478 wrote:This is such a bullshit talking point. And the Dems do it to, but the liberal media only squawks when they can demonize the Repubs.

gut;1298481 wrote:Right, because a bankrupt gubmit doesn't pose any risks.

I Wear Pants;1298476 wrote:Hi. I think that Obama is a better option than Romney.

I Wear Pants;1298484 wrote:No it isn't. Husted literally tried to eliminate voting on days that have historically had a significant amount of Dem voters. How can you support that stuff?

QuakerOats;1298489 wrote:This is where the great disconnect comes in. How can that be? On the one hand we have a community activist who has no ability, no leadership qualities, and a proven terrible record over 4 years by any number of economic measures, and no real plan for the future except apparently to continue to beat on taxpayers and small businesses. On the other hand, you have a proven successful businessman who has balanced budgets for years, turned poorly operating companies around, saved a near-collapsing Olympics, and successfully ran a state wherein he was outnumbered 9-1; oh and he gives away over 30% of his income to charity and has a flawless background and exemplary personal life.

Someone please fuc#$ing tell me how obama is the better option, with a straight face.

gut;1298494 wrote:Yes, a bullshit talking point. Thank you for clarifying me. The state has no obligation to provide opportunities to vote outside of election day. Inconvenience =/= disenfranchisement.

For crying outloud, Church buses are capable of running on days other than Sunday.

ZWICK 4 PREZ;1298485 wrote:How many times has the US Gov went bankrupt?

gut;1298501 wrote:Great point. Ask Rome if there's any flaw in your logic. Ask the USSR.

I can go on and on. That is a completely idiotic position for you to take. There's a lot of research out there that there is a tipping point (to which we are perilously close) where a nearly irreversible slide toward default begins.

I Wear Pants;1298443 wrote: