F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Feb 9, 2013 9:56pm
For a lottery pick, he sure isn't very good...so far. JJ Hickson was more impressive in his rookie season.KR1245;1385852 wrote:Dion is having a fine rookie season, not every rookie is going to set the league on fire from day 1. We havent even hit the all-star break of his rookie season and he's already a D player? I'd hate to see what you would give Harrison Barnes or some of the others guys that the Cavs were considerring.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Feb 9, 2013 9:56pm
so are you.dazedconfused;1385974 wrote:god you're annoying
KR1245
Posts: 4,317
Feb 9, 2013 10:03pm
What do you want him to do? He's putting up 15 points a game. Your expectations are waaaay too high for a NBA rookie.Footwedge;1385975 wrote:For a lottery pick, he sure isn't very good...so far. JJ Hickson was more impressive in his rookie season.
JJ Hickson averaged 4 pts and 2 rebounds his rookie year
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
Feb 9, 2013 10:32pm
Footwedge;1385973 wrote:It didn't go over my head.....putting 10 stars around the correction should have been obvious. How'd Dion do tonight?
How did speights do? He was 1-10. I don't see you calling him out
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Feb 9, 2013 10:34pm
Footwedge;1385975 wrote:For a lottery pick, he sure isn't very good...so far. JJ Hickson was more impressive in his rookie season.
4 and 2???
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Feb 9, 2013 10:36pm
Gallinari and Lawson both shot under 50% against one of the worst defensive teams in the league. Send them to the D league ASAP.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Feb 9, 2013 11:32pm
Footwedge;1385975 wrote:For a lottery pick, he sure isn't very good...so far. JJ Hickson was more impressive in his rookie season.
lmao, pwned.KR1245;1385979 wrote:What do you want him to do? He's putting up 15 points a game. Your expectations are waaaay too high for a NBA rookie.
JJ Hickson averaged 4 pts and 2 rebounds his rookie year
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Feb 10, 2013 12:37am
Eh FW's act is old, I think everyone disregards what is posted from that shmuck anyways.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Feb 10, 2013 1:52am
I feel so dirty..I bet Nuggets -5.5 tonight 
It won me 100'ish dollars, but I feel like such a traitor
It won me 100'ish dollars, but I feel like such a traitor
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Feb 10, 2013 10:46am
Not every rookie can be like Kyrie Irving there fw.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Feb 10, 2013 10:53am
Spurshoops23;1385958 wrote:Denver is the 2nd best team in the West, IMO..
However, these refs are fucking HORRIBLE.
OKC
CLIPs
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Feb 10, 2013 1:04pm
Different position...on a title caliber team....how many minutes per game?SportsAndLady;1385987 wrote:4 and 2???
Weaksauce.
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
Feb 10, 2013 1:04pm
Footwedge;1386198 wrote:Different position...on a title caliber team....how many minutes per game?
Weaksauce.
Lol stfu
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Feb 10, 2013 1:11pm
LOL @ FW. Owned again.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Feb 10, 2013 1:13pm
What does that mean? As OTrap would say, "holy sweet Mary Jesus". Who is comparing him to Irving?Pick6;1386161 wrote:Not every rookie can be like Kyrie Irving there fw.
I don't like Zeller and so far I don't like Waiters. Not too cool with Miles either. Whether you people like to admit it or not, they have a few bad players on this team. They are 16-35 for a reason. Hellooo? 16-35. That's me not being a troll...just a guy who periodically looks at the standings. That's not a good record...10 games away from a playoff spot. Hellooo? This is a sportsboard right? Right? And I'm a shmuck for saying so?
If you and the other vaginas don't like me critiquing my team, then go find another site....because that is what these boards are about.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Feb 10, 2013 1:15pm
They are 16-35 because they are STARTING 2 rookies and 2 2nd year players.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Feb 10, 2013 1:18pm
Durkie gonna have your assFootwedge;1386211 wrote: If you and the other vaginas don't like me critiquing my team
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
Feb 10, 2013 1:19pm
Or the fact they start a 20,21,21,22, and 24 year olds. Youngest starting lineup in the nba. You can tell their talented they just need to find the consistency. They will learn that through experience.
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Feb 10, 2013 1:20pm
There are a few bad players on a 16-35 team? Man you are a fucking genius.Footwedge;1386211 wrote:What does that mean? As OTrap would say, "holy sweet Mary Jesus". Who is comparing him to Irving?
I don't like Zeller and so far I don't like Waiters. Not too cool with Miles either. Whether you people like to admit it or not, they have a few bad players on this team. They are 16-35 for a reason. Hellooo? 16-35. That's me not being a troll...just a guy who periodically looks at the standings. That's not a good record...10 games away from a playoff spot. Hellooo? This is a sportsboard right? Right? And I'm a shmuck for saying so?
If you and the other vaginas don't like me critiquing my team, then go find another site....because that is what these boards are about.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Feb 10, 2013 1:23pm
Basement dweller chiming in I see. Thanks for your comprehensive insight and contribution. I'm surprised you post here given that some of the posters are black people.sleeper;1386209 wrote:LOL @ FW. Owned again.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Feb 10, 2013 1:23pm
Now you've got it.Pick6;1386224 wrote:There are a few bad players on a 16-35 team? Man you are a fucking genius.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Feb 10, 2013 1:26pm
Yeah, they're gonna improve. Brilliant on your part.sleeper;1386213 wrote:They are 16-35 because they are STARTING 2 rookies and 2 2nd year players.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Feb 10, 2013 1:27pm
Yeah no shit. They will improve. intelligence overflowing here today.Crimson streak;1386222 wrote:Or the fact they start a 20,21,21,22, and 24 year olds. Youngest starting lineup in the nba. You can tell their talented they just need to find the consistency. They will learn that through experience.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Feb 10, 2013 1:29pm
lol at FW getting pwned.
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
Feb 10, 2013 1:31pm
Footwedge;1386242 wrote:Yeah no ****. They will improve. intelligence overflowing here today.
Don't you think waiters will improve then since he's a rookie? Considering he's averaging about 14-15 a game. He should average around 18-20 with improving. I dk about you but that's pretty damn good in my book. Zeller just needs to get stronger. He gets pushed around a bit but once he bulks up he will be a solid role player. As for TT he just needs to keep developing that jumper