KR1245;1385852 wrote:Dion is having a fine rookie season, not every rookie is going to set the league on fire from day 1. We havent even hit the all-star break of his rookie season and he's already a D player? I'd hate to see what you would give Harrison Barnes or some of the others guys that the Cavs were considerring.

dazedconfused;1385974 wrote:god you're annoying

Footwedge;1385975 wrote:For a lottery pick, he sure isn't very good...so far. JJ Hickson was more impressive in his rookie season.

Footwedge;1385973 wrote:It didn't go over my head.....putting 10 stars around the correction should have been obvious. How'd Dion do tonight?

Footwedge;1385975 wrote:For a lottery pick, he sure isn't very good...so far. JJ Hickson was more impressive in his rookie season.

Footwedge;1385975 wrote:For a lottery pick, he sure isn't very good...so far. JJ Hickson was more impressive in his rookie season.

KR1245;1385979 wrote:What do you want him to do? He's putting up 15 points a game. Your expectations are waaaay too high for a NBA rookie.

JJ Hickson averaged 4 pts and 2 rebounds his rookie year

hoops23;1385958 wrote:Denver is the 2nd best team in the West, IMO..

However, these refs are fucking HORRIBLE.

SportsAndLady;1385987 wrote:4 and 2???

Footwedge;1386198 wrote:Different position...on a title caliber team....how many minutes per game?

Weaksauce.

Pick6;1386161 wrote:Not every rookie can be like Kyrie Irving there fw.

Footwedge;1386211 wrote: If you and the other vaginas don't like me critiquing my team

Footwedge;1386211 wrote:What does that mean? As OTrap would say, "holy sweet Mary Jesus". Who is comparing him to Irving?

I don't like Zeller and so far I don't like Waiters. Not too cool with Miles either. Whether you people like to admit it or not, they have a few bad players on this team. They are 16-35 for a reason. Hellooo? 16-35. That's me not being a troll...just a guy who periodically looks at the standings. That's not a good record...10 games away from a playoff spot. Hellooo? This is a sportsboard right? Right? And I'm a shmuck for saying so?

If you and the other vaginas don't like me critiquing my team, then go find another site....because that is what these boards are about.

sleeper;1386209 wrote:LOL @ FW. Owned again.

Pick6;1386224 wrote:There are a few bad players on a 16-35 team? Man you are a fucking genius.

sleeper;1386213 wrote:They are 16-35 because they are STARTING 2 rookies and 2 2nd year players.

Crimson streak;1386222 wrote:Or the fact they start a 20,21,21,22, and 24 year olds. Youngest starting lineup in the nba. You can tell their talented they just need to find the consistency. They will learn that through experience.

Footwedge;1386242 wrote:Yeah no ****. They will improve. intelligence overflowing here today.