I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
May 13, 2012 7:56pm
""CC is a pedo" and "LJ is the expert in everything." the first is awfully cruel if it's not true, the second is innocuous
R
rydawg5
Posts: 2,639
May 13, 2012 7:57pm
So basically, Ohiochatter has assumed THIS guy's advice for the direction of this site.
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
May 13, 2012 8:00pm
rydawg5;1169425 wrote:So basically, Ohiochatter has assumed THIS guy's advice for the direction of this site.
Yes. Sorry to inconvenience you.
j_crazy
Posts: 8,372
May 13, 2012 8:02pm
So it seems to me that LJ got butthurt because people are making jokes and now this.
R
rydawg5
Posts: 2,639
May 13, 2012 8:02pm
I don't think I say things that would get infracted. If you note my post count, I find it hard to post because I just get a "fuck you go away" response everytime I do.justincredible;1169431 wrote:Yes. Sorry to inconvenience you.
I was just summing up your rule post. I call it the "Thumper Clause"
You seem tense. I recommend holistic healing. Mind. Body. Soul.
I
isadore
Posts: 7,762
May 13, 2012 8:03pm
gosh what is interesting is someone can make outrageously racist, homophobic or misogynistic statements with no repercussions. But if after they make those statements you call them a racist, homophobe or misogynist, you are in trouble.
Maybe if guys couldnt get away those first set of statements you might draw more new members. Maybe you could widen your demographic.
Maybe if guys couldnt get away those first set of statements you might draw more new members. Maybe you could widen your demographic.
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
May 13, 2012 8:04pm
Justin, why is it no longer acceptable? I understand if the goal is to avoid thread divergence, but what rule is it breaking if it takes place on a thread already diverged?Fly4Fun;1169421 wrote:This is a perfect example of what is no longer acceptable as mentioned by the OP.
Seems like it's only an infraction because LJ doesn't like being called a know it all/complained about it---at least from my outside couldn't care less perspective.
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
May 13, 2012 8:04pm
rydawg5;1169435 wrote:I don't think I say things that would get infracted. If you note my post count, I find it hard to post because I just get a "fuck you go away" response everytime I do.
I was just summing up your rule post. I call it the "Thumper Clause"
It seems like you might be able to post more often now since people won't tell you to fuck off now. Maybe?
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
May 13, 2012 8:08pm
That really hurt my feelings and I hope proper action was taken by the mods for this unwarranted attack on me.wildcats20;1169140 wrote:Skyhook Jr.
You got a warning for doing EXACTLY what this thread is talking about.
j_crazy
Posts: 8,372
May 13, 2012 8:09pm
Skyhook79;1169443 wrote:That really hurt my feelings and I hope proper action was taken by the mods for this unwarranted attack on me.
Something says no. I have no problem enforcing the rules but I already disagree with what is being called personal attacks.
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
May 13, 2012 8:10pm
Skyhook79;1169443 wrote:That really hurt my feelings and I hope proper action was taken by the mods for this unwarranted attack on me.
I agree with skyhook on something.
Smile.gif
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
May 13, 2012 8:11pm
I see you missed that I gave him an infraction? Go ahead and look back through the thread.
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
May 13, 2012 8:12pm
justincredible;1169448 wrote:I see you missed that I gave him an infraction? Go ahead and look back through the thread.
For which post?
like_that
Posts: 26,625
May 13, 2012 8:12pm
SMH, so have I. Wait, that means I agree with... you.ernest_t_bass;1169447 wrote:I agree with skyhook on something.
Smile.gif
This is a sad day.
Yes, for his first offense. What about his other offenses?justincredible;1169448 wrote:I see you missed that I gave him an infraction? Go ahead and look back through the thread.
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
May 13, 2012 8:13pm
What if I typed, "GFY." is that the same as actually typing, "go fuck yourself."
j_crazy
Posts: 8,372
May 13, 2012 8:14pm
ernest_t_bass;1169451 wrote:For which post?
Yeah I thought it was for calling someone out for bitching.
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
May 13, 2012 8:14pm
like_that;1169453 wrote:SMH, so have I. Wait, that means I agree with... you.
This is a sad day.
Yes, for his first offense. What about his other offenses?
I gave lhs one for the combo of posts. Same for wildcats. Deal with it.
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
May 13, 2012 8:14pm
like_that;1169453 wrote:SMH, so have I. Wait, that means I agree with... you.
This is a sad day.
read my sig. Says it all, brother.
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
May 13, 2012 8:15pm
No, I didn't see it. Thanks. Maybe a sticky thread with a list of those infracted and what post caused the infraction would help so we know that things are not being ignored or let go.justincredible;1169448 wrote:I see you missed that I gave him an infraction? Go ahead and look back through the thread.
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
May 13, 2012 8:15pm
Not one single one of my posts was deserved of a warning.
Never once did I attack someone. I called someone out for continually whining, that is now a personal attack in your guys' eyes?
But ya'll are OK with continually harping on stupid shit like LJ and sleeper and all that shit.
Never once did I attack someone. I called someone out for continually whining, that is now a personal attack in your guys' eyes?
But ya'll are OK with continually harping on stupid shit like LJ and sleeper and all that shit.
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
May 13, 2012 8:15pm
Or you could read through the thread before posting?Skyhook79;1169461 wrote:No, I didn't see it. Thanks. Maybe a sticky thread with a list of those infracted and what post caused the infraction would help so we know that things are not being ignored or let go.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
May 13, 2012 8:15pm
LOLOL at you being the first one guilty. Couldn't happen to a nicer lawyer! Maybe you will learn to be a little more careful before attacking posters.lhslep134;1169122 wrote:This is a legit question as well. IF LJ posts with a substantive or implicative Mr. Know it All attitude are we allowed to post such or would that be violating the "LJ knows everything" prohibition?
I agree saying it for the sake of saying it is the trolling you're trying to avoid, but I mean saying someone is being a Mr. Know It All is not something that would be unique to LJ
j_crazy
Posts: 8,372
May 13, 2012 8:15pm
justincredible;1169459 wrote:I gave lhs one for the combo of posts. Same for wildcats. Deal with it.
Okay.
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
May 13, 2012 8:16pm
Skyhook79;1169461 wrote:No, I didn't see it. Thanks. Maybe a sticky thread with a list of those infracted and what post caused the infraction would help so we know that things are not being ignored or let go.
Nah.
j_crazy
Posts: 8,372
May 13, 2012 8:18pm
wildcats20;1169463 wrote:Not one single one of my posts was deserved of a warning.
Never once did I attack someone. I called someone out for continually whining, that is now a personal attack in your guys' eyes?
But ya'll are OK with continually harping on stupid shit like LJ and sleeper and all that shit.
If me saying something someone said is fucking stupid it is.