2kool4skool
Posts: 1,804
May 14, 2012 4:25pm
Yeah you definetly were. Though the gimmick you dedicated yourself to online could be unintentionally hilarious at times.ZWICK 4 PREZ;1169884 wrote:I was also a dumbass when I was 21 and in college/just graduated.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe3d5/fe3d5e1c1793efdfc25f8d449187c8727d3d59de" alt="fish82's avatar"
fish82
Posts: 4,111
May 15, 2012 7:21am
Yeah...yours is way better.2kool4skool;1170768 wrote:Yeah you definetly were. Though the gimmick you dedicated yourself to online could be unintentionally hilarious at times.
2kool4skool
Posts: 1,804
May 15, 2012 3:43pm
fish82;1171397 wrote:Yeah...yours is way better.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d49f0/d49f05be5fb01a632741845fcd90b0d85b92c970" alt=""
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
May 15, 2012 4:30pm
This is true, but we aren't paying police or Border Patrol to be douchebags to everyone that doesn't bow before their almighty authority and give them praise. It's a waste of time and money and that it happens as often as it does (and shit like this happens often apparently) just further goes to show that what we have in airports and on our borders is far more security theater than actual security. It's not made to stop terrorists, nor can it consistantly do so, but instead made to give the appearence that we're stopping terrorists.Glory Days;1169898 wrote:of course its not illegal to be sarcastic....but its also not unconstitutional to detain someone for not answering the questions the Border Patrol officer asked.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe3d5/fe3d5e1c1793efdfc25f8d449187c8727d3d59de" alt="fish82's avatar"
fish82
Posts: 4,111
May 15, 2012 4:39pm
Like I said.2kool4skool;1172113 wrote: