karen lotz;1127178 wrote:And a lot of it stems from athlete and his threads about taking them seriously, which I also understand.
Or maybe a little stems from those who come onto OSU threads with their "LOL" crap.karen lotz;1127178 wrote:And a lot of it stems from athlete and his threads about taking them seriously, which I also understand.
LJ;1127182 wrote:I didnt read any of that thread, but starting this thread when your team lost In the first round and trying to talk shit to a team going to the final four does nothing but add more bad blood on this site.
ND's win was in the regular season and didn't matter. OSU beat them in the elite 8, which matters a lot.athlete37;1127024 wrote:You know who you are. Everyone else-- carry on, OSU looked poised to win it at and they certainly have the talent to do so.
robj55;1127199 wrote:ND sports are irrelevant, this isn't the 90's anymore.
Sucks when the shoe's on the other foot doesn't it?karen lotz;1127201 wrote:Oh, really? You're ****ing annoying.
SportsAndLady;1127026 wrote:Lol
ND is irrelevant. Get the fuck over it.
I'd say 99% irrelevant, because without them how would we ever agree on something?robj55;1127199 wrote:ND sports are irrelevant, this isn't the 90's anymore.
robj55;1127199 wrote:ND sports are irrelevant, this isn't the 90's anymore.
robj55;1127209 wrote:Sucks when the shoe's on the other foot doesn't it?
It did mean nothing. Who does Notre Dame play next? Oh yea, their season is done. OSU's meant something because,well, they are playing in the final four because of it.athlete37;1127227 wrote:I never post anything on Ohio State threads. You can check my posting history. I just find it funny that those who discounted ND's wins over Syracuse without Melo, @Louisville and others are now saying ND's win over Cuse meant nothing not because Melo was out but because it was regular season. Convenient after OSU just beat Cuse without Melo.
Dude you're comparing an Elite 8/Final 4 clinching victory to a 99% meaningless regular season game in January. lol do you not see that?athlete37;1127227 wrote:I never post anything on Ohio State threads. You can check my posting history. I just find it funny that those who discounted ND's wins over Syracuse without Melo, @Louisville and others are now saying ND's win over Cuse meant nothing not because Melo was out but because it was regular season. Convenient after OSU just beat Cuse without Melo.
athlete37;1127227 wrote:I never post anything on Ohio State threads. You can check my posting history. I just find it funny that those who discounted ND's wins over Syracuse without Melo, @Louisville and others are now saying ND's win over Cuse meant nothing not because Melo was out but because it was regular season. Convenient after OSU just beat Cuse without Melo.
This. I have no problem with Notre Dame. Just these stupid threads about respecting Notre Dame.karen lotz;1127178 wrote:And a lot of it stems from athlete and his threads about taking them seriously, which I also understand.
Yea...But if so, why are 8 of the 42 posts on this unneeded thread from you? SMFHkaren lotz;1127187 wrote:I agree the thread isn't needed............
Either way, no reason to make the thread.
Who is asking us to take ND serious?WebFire;1127326 wrote:So wait...after ND is already done with their season, we are supposed to take ND serious because they beat Syracuse in the regular season, and Syracuse got beat in the tournament?
Is ND going to go back in time and make another tourney run or something? What exactly are we supposed to take serious? Hell, Michigan beat OSU in the regular season? Should we take Michigan serious now?
Sorry, I am mixing up all the stupid ND threads.SportsAndLady;1127329 wrote:Who is asking us to take ND serious?
Thread Bomber;1127309 wrote:Yea...But if so, why are 8 of the 42 posts on this unneeded thread from you? SMFH
LOLkaren lotz;1127483 wrote:Just wasting time until you come on a thread and add zero to it. ROFLMFAO
Skyhook79;1127675 wrote:LOL