Bingo.ts1227;1112711 wrote:That's why Duke is there.
But shouldn't the #1 seed get that? That was my problem with OSU's last year.The Answer;1112715 wrote:The whole bracket is fairly weak IMO. Uk and Indiana rematch could happen though
Yes I agree the 1 seed should get that. Just hasn't happened the last 2 yrschicago510;1112718 wrote:But shouldn't the #1 seed get that? That was my probably with OSU's last year.
That's right.chicago510;1112721 wrote:Mizzou the "top 2 seed"
I would too except UConn 2nd round. Depends on which Uconn shows up.Azubuike24;1112724 wrote:In 1996, Kentucky lost twice.
Non-conference vs UMass.
SEC Tournament final vs Mississippi State.
They beat UMass in the Final Four.
They had already defeated Mississippi State that year.
I love UK's bracket. Revenge vs UConn, Indiana and Duke. Interesting.
Their 16's are mostly shit conference champions, that 14 A/B game is worst at large's.GoJPM!;1112734 wrote:Don't understand how two play for 14 seed. Is the NCCA seriously trying to say there are three 16 seeds better than a 14 seed in this tournament?
I think the Bubble is so weak that they are fighting for a 14 seed. I didn't know the committee had that freedom...GoJPM!;1112734 wrote:Don't understand how two play for 14 seed. Is the NCCA seriously trying to say there are three 16 seeds better than a 14 seed in this tournament?
UConn scares me, but they have knocked UK out of 2 of their last 4 NCAA Tournaments. That's a very dangerous, but does have a revenge factor. Same with the IU match up.chicago510;1112730 wrote:I would too except UConn 2nd round. Depends on which Uconn shows up.