THE4RINGZ;1108138 wrote:Remember the video that made its rounds on the internet back in the early 2000's of that woman who was strapped to a chair and shot in the head? It looked very real, it sounded very real, and most people that could stomach watching it thought it was real. Guess what? It was not real. So to answer the question as to why someone would fake an incident like this and distibute it to the masses, some people get off on that kind of shit.

LJ;1107395 wrote:They agreed on filming him moving out for disputed items purposes.

Heretic;1108146 wrote:Kinda reminds me of when I watched 8mm with Crazy Nick Cage. Specifically the scene where he and Joaquin's character were looking into the reality of snuff films and found a couple...until they realized it was the same actress, so they were fake. That, combined with the time I've spent on porn sites in my life, has taught me that no matter what it is, somewhere, there is a demand for it.

Sonofanump;1108148 wrote:This makes sense for why filming it:

THE4RINGZ;1108153 wrote:Thank you for doing such extensive research for us on porn sites.

vball10set;1108195 wrote:I don't think it's fake, but I still can't understand how this got on the internet. This dbag knows what's on it, so how could he not have deleted it? Again, where did this take place?

vball10set;1108195 wrote:I don't think it's fake, but I still can't understand how this got on the internet. This dbag knows what's on it, so how could he not have deleted it? Again, where did this take place?

Mooney44Cards;1108198 wrote:The dude kicked his own TV, then punched a woman in the face in front of his child. He's not exactly a rocket scientist.

FatHobbit;1108200 wrote:Maybe he broke the camera, but wasn't smart enough to get the SD card? It is a little strange that he obviously knew they were filming it, but didn't destroy the evidence.

Mooney44Cards;1108169 wrote:Who cares if this is fake. It's horrible if its real, and even worse if it's not.

Real = daddy goes to jail, mommy keeps the kids
Fake = Daddy and mommy might go to jail, or if not, still might lose the kids

Simulated violence is probably just as traumatic to a young child who doesn't know the difference. Psychological scarring lasts a lot longer than a bruise or a cut.

gut;1108257 wrote:Might not have had time if a neighbor called the cops. Or might have erased it but it was able to be recovered by techs. Not sure, it's a little curious.

Hb31187;1108090 wrote:Because
1. why would someone have a random camera set up
2. if it really was the wife setting the camera up, how would he of known to go right to it and cut it off
3. if he rushed over to cover up the camera, he must of known what he did could land him in jail and he would of disposed of evidence

FatHobbit;1108200 wrote:Maybe he broke the camera, but wasn't smart enough to get the SD card? It is a little strange that he obviously knew they were filming it, but didn't destroy the evidence.

like_that;1108273 wrote:Why would they go to jail for acting? LOL. Doubt they would lose the kids as well.

Mooney44Cards;1108354 wrote:LOL because the kid doesn't know the difference. LOL LOL LOL LOL

Heretic;1108363 wrote:As far as the "play-acting" for the camera angle goes, whatever happened to those parents who had the hot-air balloon w/kids hoax from a couple years ago? Where the kids were supposedly on the balloon, it turned into a huge thing and then it was found out that the parents set it up as a publicity stunt and the kids were told to hide while it all went down.

vball10set;1108407 wrote:I wonder who actually posted this to YouTube?