Alabama Crimson Tide vs Indianapolis Colts?

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Pro Sports ▸ Alabama Crimson Tide vs Indianapolis Colts?
R

rydawg5

Senior Member

2,639 posts
Jan 31, 2012 10:58 PM
I just got into a pretty heated argument with two guys (SEC fans) where 1 person said that Indianapolis couldn't score on Alabama's defense. And the other said Alabama could beat Indianapolis (Without Peyton Manning)

I said the Colts could NAME there score on them and it was the dumbest thing I've ever heard. We probably argued for 2 hours over it.

What say you?
Jan 31, 2012 10:58pm
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Jan 31, 2012 11:00 PM
lol. Colts would run over any NCAA team. They beat 2 NFL teams. GTFOH 2 guys I dont know lol.
Jan 31, 2012 11:00pm
chicago510's avatar

chicago510

Original Chatterer

5,728 posts
Jan 31, 2012 11:02 PM
My argument is always this. Alabama probably has 10-15 Pros on their team. The Colts have 85! So GTFO with that argument.
Jan 31, 2012 11:02pm
THE4RINGZ's avatar

THE4RINGZ

R.I.P Thread Bomber

16,816 posts
Jan 31, 2012 11:09 PM
Colts by 40.
Jan 31, 2012 11:09pm
Terry_Tate's avatar

Terry_Tate

Senior Member

7,606 posts
Jan 31, 2012 11:11 PM
Lol. Bama wouldn't be able to get a pass off with Freeney and Mathis at DE.
Jan 31, 2012 11:11pm
ytownfootball's avatar

ytownfootball

Bold faced liar...

6,978 posts
Jan 31, 2012 11:13 PM
The south...still delusional since getting their ass handed to them in 1865. Should have Pattoned their ass.
Jan 31, 2012 11:13pm
THE4RINGZ's avatar

THE4RINGZ

R.I.P Thread Bomber

16,816 posts
Jan 31, 2012 11:15 PM
ytownfootball;1071755 wrote:The south...still delusional since getting their ass handed to them in 1865. Should have Pattoned their ass.

1865?

Try 1861, 1862, 1863, 1864, and 1865.
Jan 31, 2012 11:15pm
ytownfootball's avatar

ytownfootball

Bold faced liar...

6,978 posts
Jan 31, 2012 11:17 PM
THE4RINGZ;1071757 wrote:1865?

Try 1861, 1862, 1863, 1864, and 1865.
;)
Jan 31, 2012 11:17pm
D

Diet Coke

Member

49 posts
Jan 31, 2012 11:25 PM
SEC fans could carry on an argument for 2 hours? Please......
Jan 31, 2012 11:25pm
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Jan 31, 2012 11:27 PM
Colts by 70. 70-0
Jan 31, 2012 11:27pm
F

Footwedge

Senior Member

9,265 posts
Jan 31, 2012 11:39 PM
The Colts? Hell Bama would beat the Packers too. Way too mech speed on both sides of the ball.
Jan 31, 2012 11:39pm
R

rydawg5

Senior Member

2,639 posts
Jan 31, 2012 11:48 PM
Diet Coke;1071764 wrote:SEC fans could carry on an argument for 2 hours? Please......
Alabama quarterback > Painter (According to them)

Also, Alabama Defense, Offensive line, and runningbacks > Colts
Jan 31, 2012 11:48pm
I

I Am Ahab

Senior Member

478 posts
Feb 1, 2012 12:01 AM
I heard this discussion on the radio one time (not using these to teams but just the nat'l champs vs NFLs worst) and one guy was saying that back in the day in some sport, maybe baseball or basketball ( one of the pu$$y sports) the college champs used to play an exhibition against a pro team and the college team would win sometimes.

I agree with the argument that an NCAA team has a few pros while a pro team consists of pros exclusively so it makes sense that a pro team should always beat a college team but apparently not so...
Feb 1, 2012 12:01am
dwccrew's avatar

dwccrew

Not Banned

7,817 posts
Feb 1, 2012 12:02 AM
You argued with these idiots for almost 2 hours? Fool.
Feb 1, 2012 12:02am
R

rydawg5

Senior Member

2,639 posts
Feb 1, 2012 12:02 AM
I Am Ahab;1071789 wrote:I heard this discussion on the radio one time (not using these to teams but just the nat'l champs vs NFLs worst) and one guy was saying that back in the day in some sport, maybe baseball or basketball ( one of the pu$$y sports) the college champs used to play an exhibition against a pro team and the college team would win sometimes.

I agree with the argument that an NCAA team has a few pros while a pro team consists of pros exclusively so it makes sense that a pro team should always beat a college team but apparently not so...
What you are alluding to is the 1960s (I believe) -- A time where the NFL and College game were more similar with speed and scheme.

It is not even close to that in today's game.
Feb 1, 2012 12:02am
R

rydawg5

Senior Member

2,639 posts
Feb 1, 2012 12:03 AM
dwccrew;1071790 wrote:You argued with these idiots for almost 2 hours? Fool.
It was at work and there was notihng else to do.
Feb 1, 2012 12:03am
said_aouita's avatar

said_aouita

Banned

8,532 posts
Feb 1, 2012 7:59 AM
Laley23;1071746 wrote:lol. Colts would run over any NCAA team. They beat 2 NFL teams..
Even bench warmers in the NFL were studs on their college team. The worse nfl team, even using 2nd-3rd string would destroy a ncaa team.
Feb 1, 2012 7:59am
royal_k's avatar

royal_k

Senior Member

4,423 posts
Feb 1, 2012 8:17 AM
funny shit.....very delusional
Feb 1, 2012 8:17am
Rotinaj's avatar

Rotinaj

Senior Member

7,699 posts
Feb 1, 2012 8:32 AM
I always get a laugh when people say these things. No way i would be able to argue for 2 hours with these morons without pistol whipping the shit outta them.
Feb 1, 2012 8:32am
se-alum's avatar

se-alum

The Biggest Boss

13,948 posts
Feb 1, 2012 8:40 AM
chicago510;1071747 wrote:My argument is always this. Alabama probably has 10-15 Pros on their team. The Colts have 85! So GTFO with that argument.
The Colts have 53, but your point is still valid! :D
Feb 1, 2012 8:40am
G

georgemc80

Senior Member

983 posts
Feb 1, 2012 11:30 AM
chicago510;1071747 wrote:My argument is always this. Alabama probably has 10-15 Pros on their team. The Colts have 85! So GTFO with that argument.
But according to SEC fans, those are 10-15 first round picks and sure fire HOFers.
Feb 1, 2012 11:30am
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Feb 1, 2012 11:48 AM
The only instance in which I think the best college team would give the worst NFL team even a fight would have been 2001 Miami vs 2001 Carolina with Weinke at QB.
Feb 1, 2012 11:48am
R

rydawg5

Senior Member

2,639 posts
Feb 1, 2012 11:59 AM
lhslep134;1072118 wrote:The only instance in which I think the best college team would give the worst NFL team even a fight would have been 2001 Miami vs 2001 Carolina with Weinke at QB.

I still think Carolina could have named the score. Ken Dorsey couldn't even put together a scoring drive with PRO players surrounding him with the Browns.

It's never a valid argument.
Feb 1, 2012 11:59am
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Feb 1, 2012 12:10 PM
rydawg5;1072133 wrote:I still think Carolina could have named the score. Ken Dorsey couldn't even put together a scoring drive with PRO players surrounding him with the Browns.

It's never a valid argument.
Eh but he had better pro players with him at Miami than the Browns had.

Jon Vilma
Clinton Portis/Willis McGahee
Najeh Davenport
Jeremy Shockey
Kellen Winslow
Bryant McKinnie
Brett Romberg
Andre Johnson
Antrel Rolle
Mike Rumph
Ed Reed
Sean Taylor
DJ Williams
Roscoe Parish
William Joseph


Like I said. I think it's the only team that could put up a fight. Don't think they'd win because of Dorsey.
Feb 1, 2012 12:10pm
se-alum's avatar

se-alum

The Biggest Boss

13,948 posts
Feb 1, 2012 12:15 PM
lhslep134;1072150 wrote:Eh but he had better pro players with him at Miami than the Browns had.

Jon Vilma
Clinton Portis/Willis McGahee
Najeh Davenport
Jeremy Shockey
Kellen Winslow
Bryant McKinnie
Brett Romberg
Andre Johnson
Antrel Rolle
Mike Rumph
Ed Reed
Sean Taylor
DJ Williams
Roscoe Parish
William Joseph


Like I said. I think it's the only team that could put up a fight. Don't think they'd win because of Dorsey.
Alot of those guys were very young(fr,so) at that time. They would've been manhandled by NFL players.
Feb 1, 2012 12:15pm