SnotBubbles;1056053 wrote:Chelsea is your sister?

Even better: You have a sister that looks like that in Urbana (like 15 minutes from me...)???

pnhasbeen;1056343 wrote:You missed the part where he got a chubby by thinking of his sister.

Heretic;1057264 wrote:Of all the things you'd wouldn't expect Snot to miss, that'd have to rank high. Poor guy's slipping...

Devils Advocate;1060293 wrote:Even sadder, If he hasn't nailed my sister, He is one of a few in Logan or Champain counties that hasn,t

Devils Advocate;1060293 wrote:Even sadder, If he hasn't nailed my sister, He is one of a few in Logan or Champain counties that hasn,t

said_aouita;1060437 wrote:Did your sister ever work at Baby Dolls?

SnotBubbles;1050558 wrote:Justin, I already made it a point to stop talking about big black weens banging certain members sisters. I thought it was funny, and I pulled a Sherm on it. Obviously the joke was on me. No more of that, and you have my word.

4cards;1066002 wrote:^^^^^^
...wrong, personal attacks are when disgruntled members in the audience want to tar & feather un-funny comics!

sherm03;1066115 wrote:Oh. Well then. Nevermind...this clearly doesn't apply to me then.

4cards;1066820 wrote:...Clearly!

...Hey very nice article in the Cath.Exp.about all the Sherms. Your parents & the wife and I all know and understand what it takes to do what we did, and it's very satisfying to see how all of our kids have become the fine adults we hoped they would be.

Devils Advocate;1062984 wrote: She works at Honda..... Which seems to fit, because evebody rides her like one.

.

Skyhook79;1087475 wrote:Apparently you are not allowed to mention anything relating to a teams attendance along with no personal attacks or name calling, unless it's Browns fans talking about Bengals attendance of course, or hypocritecats20 will give you an infraction. Even though the rules do not say that.

Skyhook79;1087475 wrote:Apparently you are not allowed to mention anything relating to a teams attendance along with no personal attacks or name calling, unless it's Browns fans talking about Bengals attendance of course, or hypocritecats20 will give you an infraction. Even though the rules do not say that.

Skyhook79;1087475 wrote:Apparently you are not allowed to mention anything relating to a teams attendance along with no personal attacks or name calling, unless it's Browns fans talking about Bengals attendance of course, or hypocritecats20 will give you an infraction. Even though the rules do not say that.

Skyhook79;1087475 wrote:Apparently you are not allowed to mention anything relating to a teams attendance along with no personal attacks or name calling, unless it's Browns fans talking about Bengals attendance of course, or hypocritecats20 will give you an infraction. Even though the rules do not say that.

Skyhook79;1087475 wrote:Apparently you are not allowed to mention anything relating to a teams attendance along with no personal attacks or name calling, unless it's Browns fans talking about Bengals attendance of course, or hypocritecats20 will give you an infraction. Even though the rules do not say that.

Skyhook79;1087475 wrote:Apparently you are not allowed to mention anything relating to a teams attendance along with no personal attacks or name calling, unless it's Browns fans talking about Bengals attendance of course, or hypocritecats20 will give you an infraction. Even though the rules do not say that.

Skyhook79;1087475 wrote:Apparently you are not allowed to mention anything relating to a teams attendance along with no personal attacks or name calling, unless it's Browns fans talking about Bengals attendance of course, or hypocritecats20 will give you an infraction. Even though the rules do not say that.

wildcats20;1088131 wrote:You didn't get an infraction.

Skyhook79;1088141 wrote:What rule did I break?

Skyhook79;1088141 wrote:What rule did I break?