se-alum;1101852 wrote:Mike Wallace will not be franchised by the Steelers.

SportsAndLady;1101845 wrote:Are they rock bottom, BR? Or are they ROCK BOTTOM?

Commander of Awesome;1101865 wrote:You need to get a job again. Get ya out of the house.

Commander of Awesome;1101874 wrote:#Raiders : Kamerion Wimbley-LB : #Raiders to cut LB Wimbley if new deal isn’t reached

Hope a new deal isn't reached. Come home Kam.

BR1986FB;1101858 wrote:They'll tender him with a 1st rounder. I could see someone like New England, San Francisco or Cincinnati going after him. Would he be worth giving up a later 1st rounder for? I'd think so.

BR1986FB;1101665 wrote:For all of those saying "if RG3 busts it will set the franchise back" (bullshit because they are already ROCK BOTTOM), I say that "staying the course with McCoy" will, in their terminology, "set the franchise back at least 2 years." Reason being, you surround McCoy with weapons, he inevitably shows he's not "the guy" which leaves you drafting

BR1986FB;1101642 wrote: Have to be able to anticipate and throw into windows. Also have to lead receivers, in stride, on a deep ball, not make them sit and wait.

BR1986FB;1101858 wrote:They'll tender him with a 1st rounder. I could see someone like New England, San Francisco or Cincinnati going after him. Would he be worth giving up a later 1st rounder for? I'd think so.

BR1986FB;1101908 wrote:WTF? Considering retiring to join the CIA? Hillis is totally flaking out...

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/7633501/cleveland-browns-use-tag-rb-peyton-hillis-source-says

lhslep134;1101954 wrote:Would he be worth giving up our 22nd for? I mean if you're talking about drafting Kendall Wright or signing Mike Wallace, give me the proven commodity.

lhslep134;1101954 wrote:Would he be worth giving up our 22nd for? I mean if you're talking about drafting Kendall Wright or signing Mike Wallace, give me the proven commodity.

DeyDurkie5;1101947 wrote:This is all your opinion/speculation, as you don't know if mccoy will do good or not with weapons. It's not fair to say "mccoy won't do good with weapons" and then say "rg3 with weapons would be an upgrade over mccoy"..one's been in the nfl 2 years, the other just graduated and played in one of the weakest pass defense leagues in college.

BR1986FB;1101981 wrote:You just want McCoy to succeed so you get a steak dinner. :laugh:

BR1986FB;1101979 wrote:That would be all fine & good if it was the #22 but by league rules you have to give up your own original pick, meaning #4.

DeyDurkie5;1101947 wrote: the other just graduated and played in one of the weakest pass defense leagues in college.

lhslep134;1101992 wrote:Ah then no way in hell. I wasn't sure what the rule was.

Sonofanump;1102043 wrote:Count Kiper

lhslep134;1101949 wrote:Kellen Moore is awesome at that. I don't know if that means he'll be successful, given his lack of elite arm strength, but just saying, he's probably the most accurate passer in this year's draft class.

BR1986FB;1102107 wrote:That's the whole preface of the WCO. You lead a receiver/throw to an area/anticipate so they get it in stride. That's where you always hear about YAC in the WCO.