Weeden has had all day to throw all year though. Luck has had to make plays under pressure all season.Dr. KnOiTaLL;1335159 wrote:I agree that Weeden played less than spectacular. Something interesting to ponder, however, is that through 12 games: Brandon Weeden "sucks" and Andrew Luck is "phenomenal" in most people's eyes. However, statistically, Luck and Weeden each have 16 INT's through 12 games, and Weeden is actually completing a higher percentage of passes than Luck (57.04% to 55.47%).
Now, anyone would agree that Luck is a better QB than Weeden, and the gap will be pretty significant when all is said and done, but keep in mind that Weeden is a rookie with a horrible offensive coordinator and head coach. The important thing is that despite his poor performance, he still found a way to drive down the field with the game on the line and punch it in the end zone to get the win. Hopefully, with a new and hopefully better coach next year, he will progress further and make some strides to push us into playoff contention.
That's the biggest difference for me. Luck is missing plays because he's tried to force things with a pocket collapsing. Weeden has been missing things just because he's missing them. Luck also goes downfield much more often, while Weeden has assumed the role of captain checkdown (T-Rich leading the team in receptions).