2012 Cleveland Browns thread: AKA Pat Shurmur Memorial thread

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Pro Sports ▸ 2012 Cleveland Browns thread: AKA Pat Shurmur Memorial thread
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Nov 30, 2012 8:35 AM
like_that;1333372 wrote:Look at my post right above yours lol. I have to call you out on this one BR, nice fail :D.
Too much crack...:laugh: my bad
Nov 30, 2012 8:35am
Rotinaj's avatar

Rotinaj

Senior Member

7,699 posts
Nov 30, 2012 8:42 AM
Honey badger entering draft. Id love to take a 6th or so round flyer on him.
Nov 30, 2012 8:42am
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Nov 30, 2012 8:44 AM
Rotinaj;1333380 wrote:Honey badger entering draft. Id love to take a 6th or so round flyer on him.
I am sure some team will take a chance on him earlier than that.
Nov 30, 2012 8:44am
S

Sonofanump

Nov 30, 2012 9:04 AM
like_that;1333383 wrote:I am sure some team will take a chance on him earlier than that.
I heard late second round talent that will be taken in the 4th due to obvious issues.
Nov 30, 2012 9:04am
Rotinaj's avatar

Rotinaj

Senior Member

7,699 posts
Nov 30, 2012 9:08 AM
Hell id still throw a 4th at him. Cant be any worse than what we have at CB.
Nov 30, 2012 9:08am
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Nov 30, 2012 9:09 AM
Rotinaj;1333403 wrote:Hell id still throw a 4th at him. Cant be any worse than what we have at CB.
Yeah I would def throw a 4th at him. It's not like we have used two 2nd round picks on guys who missed out a year on football or anything.
Nov 30, 2012 9:09am
Mulva's avatar

Mulva

Senior Member

13,650 posts
Nov 30, 2012 10:48 AM
I don't want Mathieu at all.
Nov 30, 2012 10:48am
Crimson streak's avatar

Crimson streak

Senior Member

9,002 posts
Nov 30, 2012 11:40 AM
Mulva;1333471 wrote:I don't want Mathieu at all.

Agree he's not very good in coverage
Nov 30, 2012 11:40am
Pick6's avatar

Pick6

A USA American

14,946 posts
Nov 30, 2012 11:51 AM
I think Matheiu can be a real nice player if he stays away from the drugs (unlikely). He makes plays.
Nov 30, 2012 11:51am
royal_k's avatar

royal_k

Senior Member

4,423 posts
Nov 30, 2012 1:48 PM
Brees throws 5 picks last night and the Falcons only scored 23 points. This against one of the worst defenses in the league. I think the Falcons should probably look to draft a QB. This is really an unacceptable performance. /sarcasm
Nov 30, 2012 1:48pm
dazedconfused's avatar

dazedconfused

Senior Member

2,662 posts
Nov 30, 2012 2:10 PM
Pick6;1333540 wrote:I think Matheiu can be a real nice player if he stays away from the drugs (unlikely). He makes plays.
claiborne helped him a lot, though
Nov 30, 2012 2:10pm
Rotinaj's avatar

Rotinaj

Senior Member

7,699 posts
Nov 30, 2012 2:15 PM
royal_k;1333609 wrote:Brees throws 5 picks last night and the Falcons only scored 23 points. This against one of the worst defenses in the league. I think the Falcons should probably look to draft a QB. This is really an unacceptable performance. /sarcasm
Comparing Ryan to Weeden is highly laughable. You probably shouldn't have posted this. Pretty dumb.
Nov 30, 2012 2:15pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Nov 30, 2012 2:17 PM
Rotinaj;1333624 wrote:Comparing Ryan to Weeden is highly laughable. You probably shouldn't have posted this. Pretty dumb.
Just like it's stupid to rip on a rookie QB for helping put up 20 points against the #1 defense in the league off of 8 turnovers.
Nov 30, 2012 2:17pm
Rotinaj's avatar

Rotinaj

Senior Member

7,699 posts
Nov 30, 2012 2:23 PM
BR1986FB;1333625 wrote:Just like it's stupid to rip on a rookie QB for helping put up 20 points against the #1 defense in the league off of 8 turnovers.
Only good offense they played all year scored 31. 20 points on 8 turnovers isn't horrible but it's certainly not close to good.
Nov 30, 2012 2:23pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Nov 30, 2012 2:32 PM
Rotinaj;1333629 wrote:Only good offense they played all year scored 31. 20 points on 8 turnovers isn't horrible but it's certainly not close to good.
It wasn't good but they won and ANY win against the Steelers is cause for celebration.
Nov 30, 2012 2:32pm
royal_k's avatar

royal_k

Senior Member

4,423 posts
Nov 30, 2012 2:34 PM
Rotinaj;1333624 wrote:Comparing Ryan to Weeden is highly laughable. You probably shouldn't have posted this. Pretty dumb.[/QUOTE

Wasn't comparing them at all. Just pointing out the lack of points put up by a good QB on a bad defense with an abundance of turnovers.
Nov 30, 2012 2:34pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Nov 30, 2012 7:33 PM
Lol Weeden apologists are funny
Nov 30, 2012 7:33pm
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Nov 30, 2012 7:40 PM
BR1986FB;1333635 wrote:ANY win against the Steelers is cause for celebration.
So we're supposed to celebrate the win and just completely ignore how terrible Weeden was? Get the f*ck out of here with that completely idiotic BS.
Nov 30, 2012 7:40pm
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Nov 30, 2012 7:42 PM
like_that;1333407 wrote:Yeah I would def throw a 4th at him. It's not like we have used two 2nd round picks on guys who missed out a year on football or anything.
Gordon was a good use of a 2nd rounder. Based on what he's done so far, if he were in next year's draft (after this year) he'd be drafted in the 1st round.
Nov 30, 2012 7:42pm
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Dec 1, 2012 6:24 AM
lhslep134;1333748 wrote:So we're supposed to celebrate the win and just completely ignore how terrible Weeden was? Get the f*ck out of here with that completely idiotic BS.
Then give the same shit to Matt Ryan who could only manage 23 point off of 6 turnovers against one of the WORST defenses in the league.

And to comment on the "comparing Ryan to Weeden" comment, it's not comparing their skillsets (because Ryan is MUCH better)...it's comparing similar situations. If a stud #1 QB looks like shit against one of the worst defenses in the league, a ROOKIE QB should be given a little slack for putting up 20 points against the best defense.
Dec 1, 2012 6:24am
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Dec 1, 2012 6:50 AM
SportsAndLady;1333747 wrote:Lol Weeden apologists are funny
As are the Weeden (rookie QB) bashers...

Dec 1, 2012 6:50am
Iliketurtles's avatar

Iliketurtles

Senior Member

8,191 posts
Dec 1, 2012 11:01 AM
Rotinaj;1333380 wrote:Honey badger entering draft. Id love to take a 6th or so round flyer on him.
like_that;1333383 wrote:I am sure some team will take a chance on him earlier than that.
Yeah he will be taken well before the 6th round. I'd say 4th at the latest. Depending on what he does at the combine I could see him going in the 2nd round.
Dec 1, 2012 11:01am
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Dec 2, 2012 6:14 PM
BR1986FB;1333923 wrote:Then give the same **** to Matt Ryan who could only manage 23 point off of 6 turnovers against one of the WORST defenses in the league.
I truly mean this when I say: you are a reflection of your posts, and your post was f*cking stupid. You are bringing up Matt Ryan, who I didn't mention ONCE, to somehow justify Brandon Weeden's performance. Let's analyze this:

1) Matt Ryan is not Brandon Weeden. I think this speaks for itself.

2) I said Brandon Weeden played terribly. You failed to address this head on, and meekly offered that he should be given less slack. However, that "slack" is in comparison to Matt Ryan.

3). I did not mention Matt Ryan once.

4). You completely danced around Brandon Weeden's terrible performance, in what I am inferring to be actions caused by what is commonly called denial.


So yes, I feel fully justified for calling you stupid for your "attempt" to explain away Weeden's incompetence.
Dec 2, 2012 6:14pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Dec 2, 2012 6:20 PM
lhslep134;1334865 wrote:I truly mean this when I say: you are a reflection of your posts, and your post was f*cking stupid. You are bringing up Matt Ryan, who I didn't mention ONCE, to somehow justify Brandon Weeden's performance. Let's analyze this:

1) Matt Ryan is not Brandon Weeden. I think this speaks for itself.

2) I said Brandon Weeden played terribly. You failed to address this head on, and meekly offered that he should be given less slack. However, that "slack" is in comparison to Matt Ryan.

3). I did not mention Matt Ryan once.

4). You completely danced around Brandon Weeden's terrible performance, in what I am inferring to be actions caused by what is commonly called denial.


So yes, I feel fully justified for calling you stupid for your "attempt" to explain away Weeden's incompetence.
Many reps to you
Dec 2, 2012 6:20pm
Dr. KnOiTaLL's avatar

Dr. KnOiTaLL

Trust me, I'm a doctor!

2,682 posts
Dec 2, 2012 9:11 PM
lhslep134;1334865 wrote:I truly mean this when I say: you are a reflection of your posts, and your post was f*cking stupid. You are bringing up Matt Ryan, who I didn't mention ONCE, to somehow justify Brandon Weeden's performance. Let's analyze this:

1) Matt Ryan is not Brandon Weeden. I think this speaks for itself.

2) I said Brandon Weeden played terribly. You failed to address this head on, and meekly offered that he should be given less slack. However, that "slack" is in comparison to Matt Ryan.

3). I did not mention Matt Ryan once.

4). You completely danced around Brandon Weeden's terrible performance, in what I am inferring to be actions caused by what is commonly called denial.


So yes, I feel fully justified for calling you stupid for your "attempt" to explain away Weeden's incompetence.
I agree that Weeden played less than spectacular. Something interesting to ponder, however, is that through 12 games: Brandon Weeden "sucks" and Andrew Luck is "phenomenal" in most people's eyes. However, statistically, Luck and Weeden each have 16 INT's through 12 games, and Weeden is actually completing a higher percentage of passes than Luck (57.04% to 55.47%).

Now, anyone would agree that Luck is a better QB than Weeden, and the gap will be pretty significant when all is said and done, but keep in mind that Weeden is a rookie with a horrible offensive coordinator and head coach. The important thing is that despite his poor performance, he still found a way to drive down the field with the game on the line and punch it in the end zone to get the win. Hopefully, with a new and hopefully better coach next year, he will progress further and make some strides to push us into playoff contention.
Dec 2, 2012 9:11pm