ytownfootball;1024962 wrote:Right, because Herbstreit and Robert Smith have proven to be such big Homers lol.
lol lotz is a joke lolkaren lotz;1024966 wrote:ok. lol.
ytownfootball;1024962 wrote:Right, because Herbstreit and Robert Smith have proven to be such big Homers lol.
I mean....Herbie got run out of town.SportsAndLady;1025016 wrote:Lotz is so used to hearing Lou Holtz sperm all over Notre dame on TV that he thinks Smith and herbie are doin the same thing I guess
They shouldn't be homers and thats why they are not bias unlike others at espn.ytownfootball;1024962 wrote:Right, because Herbstreit and Robert Smith have proven to be such big Homers lol.
SportsAndLady;1025016 wrote:Lotz is so used to hearing Lou Holtz sperm all over Notre dame on TV that he thinks Smith and herbie are doin the same thing I guess
ytownfootball;1025023 wrote:I mean....Herbie got run out of town.
You're not very receptive to proof when it's put in front of your face anyway so what the hell does it matter?karen lotz;1025055 wrote:That proves nothing except there are a lot of moronic bucknuts that think OSU can do no wrong.
karen lotz;1025048 wrote:He "sperms" over pretty much everyone, including Ohio State, bro.
no shit you pick LSU to be #1...diecats gone wild;1025370 wrote:ESPN has their flagship program back next year.
They might be preseason top 5, but Karen......#1? LSU will be pre season #1 with ease next season.
I dont know how loaded USC will be, but they havent impressed me for years, and Kiffin's not a proven coach yet.
Not a chance. No chance whatsoever. You can quote me on this in the future if you want.karen lotz;1025393 wrote:SC very easily could be #1.
cats gone wild;1025412 wrote:Not a chance. No chance whatsoever. You can quote me on this in the future if you want.
LSU will be #1 because they are supposed to be better next year and return alot (very young team)
I wasnt saying quote me on LSU being #1, but USC not being preseason #1. Im glad that USC will be back tho. Been waiting to have a crack at them for years. Not looking forward to the ESPN hype and the USC band playing the same song over and over thokaren lotz;1025414 wrote:I don't have to quote you on it for the future. Everyone knows how you feel about LSU. I believe SC returns 20 starters next year, including what will be the best QB in the country and two of the best WRs in the country.
Only if they win the NC this year. If they don't, they will not be preseason #1 next year, and you can definitely quote me on that.cats gone wild;1025412 wrote:Not a chance. No chance whatsoever. You can quote me on this in the future if you want.
LSU will be #1 because they are supposed to be better next year and return alot (very young team)
I will. How many times have teams not won titles and got ranked #1 the following year? Probably happens more than it doesnt. Most teams after title games lose alot of talent, but LSU will be better.vball10set;1025435 wrote:Only if they win the NC this year. If they don't, they will not be preseason #1 next year, and you can definitely quote me on that.
100+ teams will fail to win the title this year and go on to NOT get ranked #1 next year. So you're wrong there. And it won't be hard for LSU to get better next year, because their offense can't get any worse.cats gone wild;1025483 wrote:I will. How many times have teams not won titles and got ranked #1 the following year? Probably happens more than it doesnt. Most teams after title games lose alot of talent, but LSU will be better.
I'm assuming most teams are in this category, but I'm referring to LSU in this particular case. IMO, if they win, they'll be preseason #1--if they don't, they won't.cats gone wild;1025483 wrote:I will. How many times have teams not won titles and got ranked #1 the following year? Probably happens more than it doesnt. Most teams after title games lose alot of talent, but LSU will be better.
I keep hearing LSU will be better next year. How about we wait and see. How many times have we heard that before, and a team goes on to lose 2/3 games.cats gone wild;1025483 wrote:I will. How many times have teams not won titles and got ranked #1 the following year? Probably happens more than it doesnt. Most teams after title games lose alot of talent, but LSU will be better.
Way to be totally off on what me and vball are talking about. And yeah, LSU has a horrible offense :rolleyes:GOONx19;1025598 wrote:100+ teams will fail to win the title this year and go on to NOT get ranked #1 next year. So you're wrong there. And it won't be hard for LSU to get better next year, because their offense can't get any worse.
Preseason #1 no matter what.vball10set;1025637 wrote:I'm assuming most teams are in this category, but I'm referring to LSU in this particular case. IMO, if they win, they'll be preseason #1--if they don't, they won't.
Its just easy to go off of when they play alot easier of a schedule, have a real passing QB, whole stable of RB/FB's back, Heisman candidate back, playing Bama at home, and alot of young-experienced talent coming back.centralbucksfan;1025694 wrote:I keep hearing LSU will be better next year. How about we wait and see. How many times have we heard that before, and a team goes on to lose 2/3 games.
A real passing QB? One with zero experience you mean? Its never as easy as it sounds. Thats why the preseason #1 team rarely ends up winning it all.cats gone wild;1025751 wrote: Its just easy to go off of when they play alot easier of a schedule, have a real passing QB, whole stable of RB/FB's back, playing Bama at home, and alot of young-experienced talent coming back.