Speedofsand;1017143 wrote:10tv video is hearsay and the Dispatch is hackwriters. Sure. LMAO.

Video in and of itself proves nothing -- but you knew that.

And yes, the writers for the Dispatch are hacks WHEN they put together a story full of innuendo which has no substantive proof whatsoever. You don't think otherwise decent reporters can become hacks on certain topics when beating the bushes for a big story? Of course they can.

ts1227;1017137 wrote:Given the **** you say on the politics forum, it's obvious you view quite a lot of hack journalism as the gospel

Where politics today is concerned...pick a mainstream media outlet or personality and odds are very, very good they have a clear bias and don't even try to hide it, anymore. That makes them hacks. Or maybe "shills" would be a better label.

As for your last sentence...I have no idea what you're talking about.

HitsRus;1016816 wrote:The NCAA needs to sit down, and go over it's 400 page rule book, throw half the picayune sh1t out, and condense it into

This. The amount of pages was like 422 total for the last manual (manuals are only published every other year now) and 277 pages covered 6 rules, rules 11-17.