data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c1ea/8c1ea78203ac0a233142582cfa043a5430d6e06b" alt="Pick6's avatar"
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Jun 30, 2012 7:14pm
I think Jones could be a very nice UDFA sign. Could he play the 3?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f50fb/f50fb8de55b8d47523d2a4e842d14bbc9fb29645" alt="hoops23's avatar"
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Jun 30, 2012 7:28pm
He signed a 3 year partially guaranteed contract, according to the reports I saw. Sounds like He was one of their targets with their 2nd round picks if he fell... They called him 10 minutes after the draft concluded.KR1245;1215961 wrote:I hope he makes the team, I'd rather watch him than Gody
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f50fb/f50fb8de55b8d47523d2a4e842d14bbc9fb29645" alt="hoops23's avatar"
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Jun 30, 2012 7:29pm
Doubt it. He's a 4. He has decent range to about 17-18 feet. Shot 26% from 3 in college this past season, but also had a season where he shot close to 40% from 3 I believe...Pick6;1215962 wrote:I think Jones could be a very nice UDFA sign. Could he play the 3?
Last season he WAS WVU. He carried that team offensively.
S
sportswizuhrd
Posts: 3,215
Jun 30, 2012 10:04pm
You forgot the best case comparison and worst case comparisonCommander of Awesome;1215257 wrote:http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Dion-Waiters-5738/
From DX scouting video on Waiters:
Lethal Scorer
Averaged 21.2 points per 40 minutes pace adjusted, good for 6th among SG's
Instant offense off the bench
Impossible to keep out of the lane
Can torch you in a variety of ways
Penetration
A bulldog going to the rim, great first step then too strong to stop from there
Scored 0.89 PPP out of the PnR
Scored 0.84 PPP out of iso's
25.8% of shots came at the rim where he converted 51.5%
Off the Dribble
Does a nice job getting into shot off the bounce
Shot 45.2% from 17 feet to the 3-point line
Made 25 of 72 attempts off the dribble and scored 0.82 PPP off the bounce
28.1% of his jump shots come off the dribble
3-point Range
Inconsistent but can catch fire from distance
Made 1.1 threes per game and shot 36.3%
60.4% of jumpers came from beyond the arc
Very good as a spot up shooter, posted a FG% of 47.5% and 1.01 PPP
Transition
Extremely quick baseline to baseline
Tough to stop with a full head of steam
Great at finishing with contact on the break
Transition made up 26.7% of his offensive plays
Converted 68.7% of his transition attempts
Strength & Athleticism
Great NBA fram at 6-4, 210 pounds
Does a good job finishing with contact
Sheds tackles when he attacks the rim
Has another gear, great burst and explosion
Solid leaper despite his height
Playmaking for Others
Undoubtedly a scorer first and foremost but he can set up his teammates as well
Ranked 3rd among SGs in the DX Top 100 in assists per 40 mins pace adjusted with 4.2
Doesn't have great court vision but his ability to break down the D opens up shots
Active Defender
Led all SGs w/ 3.0 stls per 40 mins pace adjusted
Quick and strong hands, plays the passing lanes
Never played M2M
Played little to no defense his freshman year, but greatly improved soph season
Best - Rodney Stuckey
Worst - Smush Parker
I think he will be better than Stuckey.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57781/57781e07b26f50f30d6b631eff6a047522785a3e" alt="mucalum49's avatar"
mucalum49
Posts: 1,639
Jul 1, 2012 11:13am
Glad we didn't draft Barnes. He tried to quiet the rumors of his "brand" through the draft process. And then 3 days later there is this.
http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/06/30/3354030/harrison-barnes-hopes-his-brand.html
http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/06/30/3354030/harrison-barnes-hopes-his-brand.html
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79e97/79e97f67f2e42e4eb5ba600a0136c83d75ee8c0a" alt="Commander of Awesome's avatar"
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Jul 2, 2012 8:06am
No kidding.KR1245;1215961 wrote:I hope he makes the team, I'd rather watch him than Gody
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/debfe/debfee8d962d933ab0876806b9e23816d20dc7b2" alt="OneBuckeye's avatar"
OneBuckeye
Posts: 5,888
Jul 2, 2012 8:48am
So anyone have a link to the rumored Sharon Reed andleboob love child? I just heard something on Kiley and Booms so not sure legit or whole story.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Jul 2, 2012 8:52am
If you Google "Sharon Reed pregnant Lebron" there are several sites reporting it but most of them look like unreliable/gossip sites.OneBuckeye;1216799 wrote:So anyone have a link to the rumored Sharon Reed andleboob love child? I just heard something on Kiley and Booms so not sure legit or whole story.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/debfe/debfee8d962d933ab0876806b9e23816d20dc7b2" alt="OneBuckeye's avatar"
OneBuckeye
Posts: 5,888
Jul 2, 2012 9:09am
Doesn't matter, seems legit. I believe it. I was going to say I couldn't wait to see lebron's bastered play against his other two sons in the NBA, what a rivalry. But then he isn't married to Savanah... lolBR1986FB;1216800 wrote:If you Google "Sharon Reed pregnant Lebron" there are several sites reporting it but most of them look like unreliable/gossip sites.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f50fb/f50fb8de55b8d47523d2a4e842d14bbc9fb29645" alt="hoops23's avatar"
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Jul 2, 2012 2:51pm
From Chad Ford's chat:
Brett (Cleveland)
Rank your ROY Candidates 1-5
Chad Ford (1:24 PM)
1. Davis. 2. Waiters 3. Beal 4. Thomas Robinson 5. MKG
Jeff K (Boston)
Best backcourt going forward: Beal/Wall, Irving/Waiters, or Gordon/Rivers?
Chad Ford (1:10 PM)
1. Irving/Waiters 2. Beal/Wall 3. Gordon/Rivers
Brett (Cleveland)
Rank your ROY Candidates 1-5
Chad Ford (1:24 PM)
1. Davis. 2. Waiters 3. Beal 4. Thomas Robinson 5. MKG
Jeff K (Boston)
Best backcourt going forward: Beal/Wall, Irving/Waiters, or Gordon/Rivers?
Chad Ford (1:10 PM)
1. Irving/Waiters 2. Beal/Wall 3. Gordon/Rivers
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79e97/79e97f67f2e42e4eb5ba600a0136c83d75ee8c0a" alt="Commander of Awesome's avatar"
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Jul 2, 2012 2:56pm
Like to hear that. He give reason why?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05882/058829be9652656b7c775c37d17acd48a7eb9b25" alt="sleeper's avatar"
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Jul 2, 2012 2:59pm
Well since Wall is trash and I also think Rivers is trash, the back court question is really a no-brainer.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f50fb/f50fb8de55b8d47523d2a4e842d14bbc9fb29645" alt="hoops23's avatar"
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Jul 2, 2012 3:32pm
[h=6]Brett (Cleveland)[/h]Commander of Awesome;1217148 wrote:Like to hear that. He give reason why?
What do you think Dion Waiters' ceiling is? And what player do you compare Tyler Zeller to?
[h=6]Chad Ford (1:08 PM)
[/h]
I wrote in May that Waiters had a little D-Wade in his game. Still believe that. But that's different than saying he will be Wade. I think Monta Ellis may be a more accurate comparison. I like the fit in Cleveland. Zeller is probably a back-up at the next level, but he runs the floor really well and should be a good fit in an up-tempo offense. A little surprised Cavs didn't make a stronger move toward Nic Batum ... I think he'd be a really nice fit with the rest of that team.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bce86/bce863ad5bd6949a54b80d6ca3a9213fd6a43c44" alt="Midstate01's avatar"
Midstate01
Posts: 14,766
Jul 2, 2012 4:03pm
I'd take monte ellis'ish. Ellis is an a-hole but can shoot lights out!!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f50fb/f50fb8de55b8d47523d2a4e842d14bbc9fb29645" alt="hoops23's avatar"
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Jul 2, 2012 4:23pm
Waiters is a lot stronger than Ellis though. So that's a good thing in terms of durability.
Looking at highlights, Waiters is a powerful dunker too. He has some major ups.
Looking at highlights, Waiters is a powerful dunker too. He has some major ups.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f50fb/f50fb8de55b8d47523d2a4e842d14bbc9fb29645" alt="hoops23's avatar"
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Jul 2, 2012 4:24pm
What are some thoughts on Jeff Green? If you're the Cavs and he has a clean bill of health, would you take a chance on him? Dude is talented and can play inside and out on the perimeter...
Would fill a huge void on the team at the 3 and would allow Gee to come off the bench.
Would fill a huge void on the team at the 3 and would allow Gee to come off the bench.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f50fb/f50fb8de55b8d47523d2a4e842d14bbc9fb29645" alt="hoops23's avatar"
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Jul 2, 2012 6:19pm
Manny Harris was waived today.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e4a2/3e4a2077c1f3e45dab8e238c44b7bb2b3ea4d05c" alt="Mulva's avatar"
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Jul 2, 2012 6:55pm
Absolutely. Batum would be better, but if the Wolves really offered upwards of $12 mil/yr that's probably too steep.hoops23;1217196 wrote:What are some thoughts on Jeff Green? If you're the Cavs and he has a clean bill of health, would you take a chance on him? Dude is talented and can play inside and out on the perimeter...
Would fill a huge void on the team at the 3 and would allow Gee to come off the bench.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a06c/9a06c23a653bdd08f2dab6b12a25cc10255bb675" alt="KR1245's avatar"
KR1245
Posts: 4,317
Jul 2, 2012 6:59pm
I think the Celtics really want to re-sign Green. I would be alright with it but I think he stays in Boston
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce14d/ce14df28d581fef2c132c8c500a04771f111e527" alt="wildcats20's avatar"
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Jul 2, 2012 7:03pm
Yeah, he will be in Boston again.KR1245;1217285 wrote:I think the Celtics really want to re-sign Green. I would be alright with it but I think he stays in Boston
And if Boston is able to keep Ray Ray and get all the injured players back, they will be right there again next year challenging the Heat.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f50fb/f50fb8de55b8d47523d2a4e842d14bbc9fb29645" alt="hoops23's avatar"
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Jul 2, 2012 7:08pm
Yeah, I agree.KR1245;1217285 wrote:I think the Celtics really want to re-sign Green. I would be alright with it but I think he stays in Boston
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a06c/9a06c23a653bdd08f2dab6b12a25cc10255bb675" alt="KR1245's avatar"
KR1245
Posts: 4,317
Jul 2, 2012 7:20pm
Saw this over on RCF, I usually dont like these mixes but thought this one was pretty cool. Almost forgot how good Kyrie was last season
[video=youtube;UgpXwCiRxgg][/video]
[video=youtube;UgpXwCiRxgg][/video]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce14d/ce14df28d581fef2c132c8c500a04771f111e527" alt="wildcats20's avatar"
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Jul 2, 2012 8:53pm
FWIW, Boston and Green are "near" a deal.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f50fb/f50fb8de55b8d47523d2a4e842d14bbc9fb29645" alt="hoops23's avatar"
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Jul 2, 2012 9:08pm
•Bob Finnan of The News-Herald: The Cavaliers have about $20 million available in salary-cap space to spend in free agency. Don't expect them to spend much of it. They'll take a frugal approach to free agency this summer, even though they have several holes to fill. The free-agent class is comparatively weak. There are few good, young stars on the market. Secondly, the Cavs want to maintain their flexibility at the trade deadline in February and next summer. This time next year, a punitive or "super" luxury tax kicks in. The tax will be assessed at different levels based on the amount that a team is over the threshold.
This year, it's a dollar-for-dollar tax. Starting next year, teams could pay $1.50 on the dollar, and up to $3.50. Experts predict teams will want to dump players — perhaps some very good ones — to stay out of that tax threshold. Teams with cap space could benefit greatly. With all that being said, the Cavs will have to fill out their roster. They need shooting from the small forward or power forward positions.
This year, it's a dollar-for-dollar tax. Starting next year, teams could pay $1.50 on the dollar, and up to $3.50. Experts predict teams will want to dump players — perhaps some very good ones — to stay out of that tax threshold. Teams with cap space could benefit greatly. With all that being said, the Cavs will have to fill out their roster. They need shooting from the small forward or power forward positions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdd58/bdd58d85797e0a3c6dc786c956196d5cb593189f" alt="Crimson streak's avatar"
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
Jul 2, 2012 9:14pm
hoops23;1217400 wrote:•Bob Finnan of The News-Herald: The Cavaliers have about $20 million available in salary-cap space to spend in free agency. Don't expect them to spend much of it. They'll take a frugal approach to free agency this summer, even though they have several holes to fill. The free-agent class is comparatively weak. There are few good, young stars on the market. Secondly, the Cavs want to maintain their flexibility at the trade deadline in February and next summer. This time next year, a punitive or "super" luxury tax kicks in. The tax will be assessed at different levels based on the amount that a team is over the threshold.
This year, it's a dollar-for-dollar tax. Starting next year, teams could pay $1.50 on the dollar, and up to $3.50. Experts predict teams will want to dump players — perhaps some very good ones — to stay out of that tax threshold. Teams with cap space could benefit greatly. With all that being said, the Cavs will have to fill out their roster. They need shooting from the small forward or power forward positions.
I'm completely ok with this. We don't need another Larry Hughes contract. No reason to over pay right now.