isadore;984430 wrote:I am sorry that you have this great sympathy for people who wish to kill Americans. Its a free country, you can say what you want, even sympathy for the devils who wish to kill us.

dwccrew;984428 wrote:I didn't say I disapprove, I was asking you if we should bomb some more? I think we should. It's the only way to get them to accept democracy.

isadore;984423 wrote:You can not step away from your hatred for this country. Your sorry we went into Afghanistan, overthrew a regime that provided a base for Al queda. Sorry if we went in and stopped them from oppressing women and minorities, sorry if we stopped them from protecting Osama bin laden.
Here is where your sympathies lay
"So we have the right to just run roughshod over anyone and they are automatically the bad guys for using gorilla/brutal tactics that are their only real way to fight."
with the scum that kills Americans. They should all rot in Hell. Despite what you say they are the bad guys. Not who you label as evil the American troops who fight their terrorism and oppression.

isadore;984437 wrote:I realize that your heart might bleed for these folks but I find drone technology and useage about the best use of my tax dollars. Kills scum without a direct threat to American lives.

dwccrew;984433 wrote:I am sorry that you have this great sympathy for people who wish to kill Americans. Its a free country, you can say what you want, even sympathy for the devils who wish to kill us.

isadore;984446 wrote:that is the most intelligent statement I have ever read of yours, the true comment of an enlightened mind. Terrorists need killing, and if it takes more bombs, please increase my taxes for that purpose.

I Wear Pants;984443 wrote:It's sad that you want American soldiers to get killed in wars that do not benefit our country. Too bad you feel that they are fodder for your meaningless wars.

isadore;984456 wrote:Denying Al Queda a base to repeat their slaughter of 3000 Americans is hardly of no benefit to America or "meaningless." But you, as you wrote, would not want to insult the Taliban by calling them "bad guys" for using "gorilla\brutal tactics" like executing prisoners, mutilating women, roadside ied and suicide bombers used against civilians and our troops. According to you they are just fighting evil imperialist.

isadore;984456 wrote:Denying Al Queda a base to repeat their slaughter of 3000 Americans is hardly of no benefit to America or "meaningless." But you, as you wrote, would not want to insult the Taliban by calling them "bad guys" for using "gorilla\brutal tactics" like executing prisoners, mutilating women, roadside ied and suicide bombers used against civilians and our troops. According to you they are just fighting evil imperialist.

I Wear Pants;984463 wrote:No no no, you're right, we definitely need to send more troops to be killed. And buy more bombs too because we don't really need that money for anything else and it's not like a strong economy would be good for America anyway. More bombs, more dead soldiers, that's the road to America prosperity. Don't know how I didn't see it.

dwccrew;984451 wrote:Gosh a ruddies, I've only said that in 3 or 4 posts. Obviously you don't have the mental capacity to understand that. I mean I clearly stated that I believe we need to continue bombing these people so they will eventually be our friends and not our enemies. Just keep killing them until the come around and accept our way of life and democracy. How is that any different than what you said? Gosh a ruddies

I Wear Pants;984463 wrote:No no no, you're right, we definitely need to send more troops to be killed. And buy more bombs too because we don't really need that money for anything else and it's not like a strong economy would be good for America anyway. More bombs, more dead soldiers, that's the road to America prosperity. Don't know how I didn't see it.

isadore;984477 wrote:Obviously why you disapprove of our actions is that you do not see taliban and al queda as bad guys. No for you 9/1 was a justified action against American imperialism. Just another 3000 dead little Eichman's. How dare we overthrow the taliban regime, they were just applying Sharia law and providing shelter to an oppressed group of non bad guy muslims, al queda.

isadore;984470 wrote:to copy is of course the sincerest form of flattery, so I am deeply appreciative of the use of one on my favorite phrases. Your little twin claimed I got it from Sarah Palin, so as you read my statements I hope you picture her writing them. Insincerity on the other hand is hardly a positive trait. While I have no problem with the continuing bombing of this evil scum, your earlier comments on several threads would show that your statement quoted above is hardly reflective of your true opinion. You have repeatedly expressed opinions very negative toward America's efforts to defeat terrorism. Personally I hope a bomb is killing some terrorists as I type.

isadore;984477 wrote:Obviously why you disapprove of our actions is that you do not see taliban and al queda as bad guys. No for you 9/1 was a justified action against American imperialism. Just another 3000 dead little Eichman's. How dare we overthrow the taliban regime, they were just applying Sharia law and providing shelter to an oppressed group of non bad guy muslims, al queda.

I Wear Pants;984480 wrote:We should just kill all the Muslims. More dead Muslims the safer and better America will be.

I Wear Pants;984480 wrote:We should just kill all the Muslims. More dead Muslims the safer and better America will be.

dwccrew;984481 wrote:



I approve of what happened on 9/1. But as for 9/11, we must kill everyone, even those that weren't involved at all like Iraqis and now hopefully some Iranians.

isadore;984486 wrote:"non bad guy" terrorists before they can kill American troops or civilians.

isadore;984493 wrote:While I realize you may have a personal sympathy with the Iranian regime, I cannot say I am at all sorry to hear of the killing of members of it nuclear program or Quds that have killed Americans.

dwccrew;984482 wrote:Now you get it. Eventually they will love us. We must use the same philosophy as the Brits did against the Scots many centuries ago.

I Wear Pants;984497 wrote:Define "terrorist" for us. Is it everyone in Afghanistan? Iraq? Iran? All Muslims?

Who all should we kill oh great moral adjudicator?

isadore;984501 wrote:Wow, I am glad you learn your history of 13th and 14th century Great Britain from Braveheart. But I find what America is trying to do giving people freedom to rule themselves with the supposed oppressive acts of Edward I. For you there is no difference between William Wallace and Osama Bin Laden and Mullah Omar.

isadore;984501 wrote:Wow, I am glad you learn your history of 13th and 14th century Great Britain from Braveheart. But I find what America is trying to do giving people freedom to rule themselves with the supposed oppressive acts of Edward I. For you there is no difference between William Wallace and Osama Bin Laden and Mullah Omar.