Ohio is #5 for most players in the NFL

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Pro Sports ▸ Ohio is #5 for most players in the NFL
Speedofsand's avatar

Speedofsand

Troublemaker

5,529 posts
Nov 11, 2011 4:55 PM
LJ;968270 wrote:Prove that Jmog's statement is incorrect....

You can't

Prove that what he said is statistically irrelevant....

You can't

I never said jmog's post was statistically irrelevant. I asked where he got that Ohio is 3rd. And how about you just go to the link and prove what he said IS correct? YOU CAN'T.
How can you keep arguing about this? Look at your own quote of Lotz, the top 6 states 'per capita' are in SEC country.
Nov 11, 2011 4:55pm
hoops23's avatar

hoops23

Senior Member

15,696 posts
Nov 11, 2011 5:04 PM
This is such a stupid argument LOL..
Nov 11, 2011 5:04pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Nov 11, 2011 5:28 PM
Speedofsand;968288 wrote:I never said jmog's post was statistically irrelevant. I asked where he got that Ohio is 3rd. And how about you just go to the link and prove what he said IS correct? YOU CAN'T.
How can you keep arguing about this? Look at your own quote of Lotz, the top 6 states 'per capita' are in SEC country.
God you are retarded. Of the top 5 schools by total, OSU is 3rd per capita. No one EVER said that OSU is 3rd per capita overall. Instead of trying to suck Lotz's tiny little dick, how about you try to comprehend what is even being talked about.
Nov 11, 2011 5:28pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Nov 11, 2011 5:44 PM
Florida 184 NFL players, 18.8 million people, 1 NFL player per 102,181 people
Georgia 90 NFL players, 9.6 Million people, 1 NFL player per 107,641 people
Ohio 85 NFL players, 11.5 million people, 1 NFL player per 135,294 people
Texas 183 NFL players, 25.1 million people, 1 NFL player per 137,158 people
California 225 NFL players, 37.2 million people, 1 NFL player per 165,333 people
Nov 11, 2011 5:44pm
Speedofsand's avatar

Speedofsand

Troublemaker

5,529 posts
Nov 11, 2011 6:18 PM
LJ;968321 wrote:Florida 184 NFL players, 18.8 million people, 1 NFL player per 102,181 people
Georgia 90 NFL players, 9.6 Million people, 1 NFL player per 107,641 people
Ohio 85 NFL players, 11.5 million people, 1 NFL player per 135,294 people
Texas 183 NFL players, 25.1 million people, 1 NFL player per 137,158 people
California 225 NFL players, 37.2 million people, 1 NFL player per 165,333 people

Now you have gone from saying SCHOOLS to STATES. Your stat is nowhere in the link, so its irrelevant. Thanks for playing dumbass. Unless you mean the Ohio Bobcats have 85 players in the NFL.

Oh look, Florida is #1 on LJ's list. Pick6 is wrong. Haha.
Nov 11, 2011 6:18pm
Speedofsand's avatar

Speedofsand

Troublemaker

5,529 posts
Nov 11, 2011 6:20 PM
LJ;968310 wrote:Of the top 5 schools by total, OSU is 3rd per capita. No one EVER said that OSU is 3rd per capita overall.
Yes you did.
Nov 11, 2011 6:20pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Nov 11, 2011 6:24 PM
Speedofsand;968332 wrote:Now you have gone from saying SCHOOLS to STATES. Your stat is nowhere in the link, so its irrelevant. Thanks for playing dumbass. Unless you mean the Ohio Bobcats have 85 players in the NFL.

Oh look, Florida is #1 on LJ's list. Pick6 is wrong. Haha.
That was my bad. I meant the state of Ohio.

Just because the real life facts are not in that one link makes them not real? HAHAHAHA

Thanks for playing retard
Nov 11, 2011 6:24pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Nov 11, 2011 6:25 PM
Speedofsand;968334 wrote:Yes you did.
No one ever said that Ohio was 3rd overall per capita. Quote where that was said.
Nov 11, 2011 6:25pm
Speedofsand's avatar

Speedofsand

Troublemaker

5,529 posts
Nov 11, 2011 6:27 PM
post #35 in this thread.


Originally Posted by karen lotz

You say Ohio is number 3 per capita citing jmog. Accurate or not?


LJ: Accurate, because his statement was

Out of the top 5 schools, Ohio is 3rd when it comes to total population vs NFL players
Nov 11, 2011 6:27pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Nov 11, 2011 6:28 PM
Speedofsand;968338 wrote:post #35 in this thread.


Originally Posted by karen lotz

You say Ohio is number 3 per capita citing jmog. Accurate or not?


LJ: Accurate, because his statement was

Out of the top 5 schools, Ohio is 3rd when it comes to total population vs NFL players

So where did I say that Ohio was #3 OVERALL?

All I see is that out of the top 5 schools in producing NFL talent, OSU is 3rd per capita.

Are you that fucking stupid?
Nov 11, 2011 6:28pm
Speedofsand's avatar

Speedofsand

Troublemaker

5,529 posts
Nov 11, 2011 6:31 PM
LJ;968340 wrote:So where did I say that Ohio was #3 OVERALL?

All I see is that out of the top 5 schools in producing NFL talent, OSU is 3rd per capita.

Are you that ****ing stupid?
Its not schools, its not OSU. It is STATES. You are that fucking stupid !!!!!
Nov 11, 2011 6:31pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Nov 11, 2011 6:32 PM
Speedofsand;968341 wrote:Its not schools, its not OSU. It is STATES. You are that fucking stupid !!!!!
God dammit

It's true
Nov 11, 2011 6:32pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Nov 11, 2011 6:36 PM
The point is valid though.

Top 5 states
California
226
Florida
184
Texas
183
Georgia
90
Ohio
85
Ranking of those states per capita

Florida
Georgia
Ohio
Texas
California
Nov 11, 2011 6:36pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Nov 11, 2011 7:22 PM
Rank them in reverse alphabetical and Ohio is second.
Nov 11, 2011 7:22pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Nov 11, 2011 7:31 PM
karen lotz;968372 wrote:Rank them in reverse alphabetical and Ohio is second.

I find it hilarious that you think that tidbit is statisically irrelevant. And you were trying to bust on people's math skills ROFL
Nov 11, 2011 7:31pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Nov 11, 2011 7:33 PM
I find it hilarious you said you were done discussing it, yet here you are still scrambling to save face.
Nov 11, 2011 7:33pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Nov 11, 2011 7:35 PM
Also keep calling people fucking retards and that they have little dicks, those are sure signs you are wrong.
Nov 11, 2011 7:35pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Nov 11, 2011 7:37 PM
karen lotz;968382 wrote:I find it hilarious you said you were done discussing it, yet here you are still scrambling to save face.

Save face on what? Im not the one who has changed my argument multie times. Ive been 100% consistant (minus the stupid school vs state fuckup lol). You on the other hand went from claiming I said ohio was higher than florida, to claiming I said ohio was #3 overall, to now claiming that this fact is statistically irrelevant. You have been off base this whole time
Nov 11, 2011 7:37pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Nov 11, 2011 7:37 PM
karen lotz;968388 wrote:Also keep calling people fucking retards and that they have little dicks, those are sure signs you are wrong.

How am I wrong. Prove said stats above wrong.

K go
Nov 11, 2011 7:37pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Nov 11, 2011 7:39 PM
Why did you tell SOS to google per capita?
Nov 11, 2011 7:39pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Nov 11, 2011 7:41 PM
karen lotz;968393 wrote:Why did you tell SOS to google per capita?

Because he obviously didnt understand what "per capita" meant with his responses.
Nov 11, 2011 7:41pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Nov 11, 2011 7:47 PM
Because he asked where jmog was getting his ranking with Ohio 3rd he didn't understand per capita? The link in the original post clearly shows the top states per capita.
Nov 11, 2011 7:47pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Nov 11, 2011 7:51 PM
karen lotz;968404 wrote:Because he asked where jmog was getting his ranking with Ohio 3rd he didn't understand per capita? The link in the original post clearly shows the top states per capita.

Read his responses again. What is so hard to understand about jmogs post? He also mentions "incorrectly". Are you still having problems understanding? No one anywhere at any point has said ohio is #3 overall per capita, so what does the overall per capita ranking have to do with the per capita ranking of the top 5 producers by volume?
Nov 11, 2011 7:51pm
Speedofsand's avatar

Speedofsand

Troublemaker

5,529 posts
Nov 11, 2011 7:54 PM
Sure I do. The states are listed NFL players 'per capita'. That's the part where the top 6 are in SEC country. I already said that in Sept. and in this thread. The way you re-arrange it for Ohio to be 3rd is not in the link. Therefore, not relevant.
Nov 11, 2011 7:54pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Nov 11, 2011 7:57 PM
Speedofsand;968407 wrote:Sure I do. The states are listed NFL players 'per capita'. That's the part where the top 6 are in SEC country. I already said that in Sept. and in this thread. The way you re-arrange it for Ohio to be 3rd is not in the link. Therefore, not relevant.

Just because it isnt in the link does not make it statistically irrelevant. It ranks the effeciency of each of the top 5 producers, which is overall relevant.
Nov 11, 2011 7:57pm