C
cats gone wild
Posts: 2,651
Nov 21, 2011 9:22pm
If you watched the BCS countdown show today and plus look at others calculations, then........
Lets just say, I would listen to them over you. I can see where you are coming from but the computers are hurting Ark no matter what.
Lets just say, I would listen to them over you. I can see where you are coming from but the computers are hurting Ark no matter what.
A
Al Bundy
Posts: 4,180
Nov 22, 2011 2:25pm
LSU would also have to hope that Bama doesn't get upset, or they would be out of title game.cats gone wild;982839 wrote:Looks like LSU will still make SEC title/title game even if they lose to Ark. After alot of figuring out, LSU looks to be in a great position no matter what. Unless they get beat bad, which wont happen.
C
cats gone wild
Posts: 2,651
Nov 22, 2011 2:30pm
Have you seen AUB this year. I dont think we have to worry about Bama getting beat.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f9b8/4f9b8bc18faa8758c6dffc00f6edbf73435b55a9" alt="FatHobbit's avatar"
FatHobbit
Posts: 8,651
Nov 22, 2011 2:42pm
There were a few teams last Saturday that didn't have anything to worry about either.cats gone wild;983915 wrote:Have you seen AUB this year. I dont think we have to worry about Bama getting beat.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95644/956443972e66a09edef86ba74c9e8901a36a5480" alt="dwccrew's avatar"
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Nov 22, 2011 5:53pm
Yeah, but every other conferences bad teams would be SEC East champs. The SEC is terrible outside of 3 teams. Auburn is garbage and might not win any games in the Big 12 except maybe against Kansas, but probably not.FatHobbit;983932 wrote:There were a few teams last Saturday that didn't have anything to worry about either.
C
cats gone wild
Posts: 2,651
Nov 22, 2011 6:10pm
Wait a minute, you just said UGA is one of the SEC's top 3 teams on another post. Try backing out of that.dwccrew;984165 wrote:Yeah, but every other conferences bad teams would be SEC East champs. The SEC is terrible outside of 3 teams. Auburn is garbage and might not win any games in the Big 12 except maybe against Kansas, but probably not.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05882/058829be9652656b7c775c37d17acd48a7eb9b25" alt="sleeper's avatar"
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Nov 22, 2011 6:39pm
Finally someone else besides me gets it. I win, again.dwccrew;984165 wrote:Yeah, but every other conferences bad teams would be SEC East champs. The SEC is terrible outside of 3 teams. Auburn is garbage and might not win any games in the Big 12 except maybe against Kansas, but probably not.
C
cats gone wild
Posts: 2,651
Nov 22, 2011 6:43pm
Maybe its because dwccrew is sleeper???
S
superman
Posts: 3,582
Nov 22, 2011 6:53pm
Says the idiot who has cited Auburn as a quality win for LSU several times this year.cats gone wild;983915 wrote:Have you seen AUB this year. I dont think we have to worry about Bama getting beat.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95644/956443972e66a09edef86ba74c9e8901a36a5480" alt="dwccrew's avatar"
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Nov 22, 2011 9:47pm
Yeah, one of the SEC's 3 best teams. Every other conferences 8th best team. Derpcats gone wild;984175 wrote:Wait a minute, you just said UGA is one of the SEC's top 3 teams on another post. Try backing out of that.
He has to since LSU really only has one quality win and that was a fluke over Bama.superman;984213 wrote:Says the idiot who has cited Auburn as a quality win for LSU several times this year.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/952f4/952f48c68a77f58aaa2b184e42d03f71935c97c7" alt="karen lotz's avatar"
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Nov 22, 2011 10:37pm
dwccrew;984357 wrote:Yeah, one of the SEC's 3 best teams. Every other conferences 8th best team. Derp
He has to since LSU really only has one quality win and that was a fluke over Bama.
Oregon wasn't a quality win? If Bama and Oregon aren't quality wins, no team in the country has any quality wins.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95644/956443972e66a09edef86ba74c9e8901a36a5480" alt="dwccrew's avatar"
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Nov 22, 2011 10:42pm
I counted Bama, even though it was a fluke win.karen lotz;984450 wrote:Oregon wasn't a quality win? If Bama and Oregon aren't quality wins, no team in the country has any quality wins.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fbfd8/fbfd805ad1d5f97569433a2ab8ed61cd8013578d" alt="GOONx19's avatar"
GOONx19
Posts: 7,147
Nov 22, 2011 10:44pm
The computers currently have Arkansas 4th. Would that not improve if they won Saturday?cats gone wild;983015 wrote:If you watched the BCS countdown show today and plus look at others calculations, then........
Lets just say, I would listen to them over you. I can see where you are coming from but the computers are hurting Ark no matter what.
C
cats gone wild
Posts: 2,651
Nov 23, 2011 12:05am
Do you wanna compare LSU's wins to anyone else in the country? Yeah, thats what I thought. And you are a complete joke if you think LSU is at the bottom of other conferences and 4th or farther down the list in the SEC. I guess the WHOLE country is clueless in your eyes. Do you want to make any bet for the LSU/ARK game? You truly are sleeper with another name.dwccrew;984357 wrote:Yeah, one of the SEC's 3 best teams. Every other conferences 8th best team. Derp
He has to since LSU really only has one quality win and that was a fluke over Bama.
C
cats gone wild
Posts: 2,651
Nov 23, 2011 12:06am
You can do your own research or watch ESPN. Its not hard to find.GOONx19;984461 wrote:The computers currently have Arkansas 4th. Would that not improve if they won Saturday?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fbfd8/fbfd805ad1d5f97569433a2ab8ed61cd8013578d" alt="GOONx19's avatar"
GOONx19
Posts: 7,147
Nov 24, 2011 1:11am
Or you could just type it yourself in the amount of time it took you to reply to that post. I don't care enough about average football teams to do it myself. Doucher.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95644/956443972e66a09edef86ba74c9e8901a36a5480" alt="dwccrew's avatar"
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Nov 26, 2011 5:31pm
You truly are a troll puppet who's strings are very easy to pull.cats gone wild;984574 wrote:Do you wanna compare LSU's wins to anyone else in the country? Yeah, thats what I thought. And you are a complete joke if you think LSU is at the bottom of other conferences and 4th or farther down the list in the SEC. I guess the WHOLE country is clueless in your eyes. Do you want to make any bet for the LSU/ARK game? You truly are sleeper with another name.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e4a2/3e4a2077c1f3e45dab8e238c44b7bb2b3ea4d05c" alt="Mulva's avatar"
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Nov 26, 2011 6:19pm
Southern Miss will beat Houston in the C-USA championship and Boise State will make the BCS.
E
enigmaax
Posts: 4,511
Nov 26, 2011 9:14pm
You think TCU is going to get beat, Boise is going to get to #4 or Boise is going to get an at-large bid?Mulva;988326 wrote:Southern Miss will beat Houston in the C-USA championship and Boise State will make the BCS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f46a/5f46a4a674f4cc5b7dc46bcf04a3ba10b64f0ba9" alt="Azubuike24's avatar"
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Nov 26, 2011 9:34pm
Good point. Now that I think about it, TCU is the conference champion, which will preclude Boise from getting the non-AQ "top BCS ranking" spot. This will go to Houston if they beat Southern Mississippi and if they lose, it would throw it out the window as no non-AQ champion will finish in the top 14 of the BCS standings.
Could the BCS still take Boise since they are co-champion (even though they lost head to head)?
Could the BCS still take Boise since they are co-champion (even though they lost head to head)?
E
enigmaax
Posts: 4,511
Nov 26, 2011 9:37pm
Haven't found any confirmation on this, but I don't know why the MWC would name TCU its champion on a head-to-head tiebreaker when it would mean losing out on BCS money for the conference. I have no doubt that Boise would go to a BCS bowl in that case and TCU would still go to the regular #1 MWC bowl.Azubuike24;988479 wrote:Could the BCS still take Boise since they are co-champion (even though they lost head to head)?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f46a/5f46a4a674f4cc5b7dc46bcf04a3ba10b64f0ba9" alt="Azubuike24's avatar"
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Nov 26, 2011 9:45pm
Credibility of the conference if TCU won on the Blue Turf...then again, it's the BCS, and it's big money for the MWC if one of their members gets a bid.
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Nov 26, 2011 10:13pm
Found this from 2003 because I was wondering the same thing but I can't vouch that it's up-to-date. http://graphics.fansonly.com/photos/schools/mwc/genrel/auto_pdf/Football.pdfenigmaax;988486 wrote:Haven't found any confirmation on this, but I don't know why the MWC would name TCU its champion on a head-to-head tiebreaker when it would mean losing out on BCS money for the conference.
Head-to-head is the tiebreaker.
E
enigmaax
Posts: 4,511
Nov 26, 2011 11:05pm
But that is for the normal bowl selection. They don't have a reason to break the tie for BCS purposes. TCU goes to the #1 MWC bowl whether Boise goes to the BCS or not. I just don't think the MWC would say, "well, TCU wins the tiebreaker, so they are our BCS candidate" when they won't be eligible. I believe they'd call it a tie, expect Boise to get the BCS autobid and TCU would still get its rightful reward in the #1 MWC bowl (I don't even know what that is anymore).lhslep134;988534 wrote:Found this from 2003 because I was wondering the same thing but I can't vouch that it's up-to-date. http://graphics.fansonly.com/photos/schools/mwc/genrel/auto_pdf/Football.pdf
Head-to-head is the tiebreaker.
None of it is likely since TCU probably is going to have little trouble with UNLV. But there would be no reason to use a tiebreaker in that scenario since doing so/not doing so doesn't affect TCU's bowl.
C
cats gone wild
Posts: 2,651
Nov 26, 2011 11:10pm
Clemson does the normal Clemson choke job. Hyped again, but fail for another season.