I've never read the actual email he apparently sent, but I believe he did testify today that he 'did enough' to ensure that it stopped. I don't think either side asked what that meant in detail but nothing more than that was really relevant to the particular set of charges being argued today, so I'm sure we'll get an answer to that when (if ever) there is an actual trial for Sandusky that McQueary can testify for the prosecution. IMO, I took it to mean that he didn't actually 'do' anything but that his presence there was enough to make it stop. Then he left. (A very stand up decision...)Fab1b;1017435 wrote:So he said a few weeks ago that he stopped it???? Doesn't sound that way to me. What a **** the ginger is!
I think I understand why the NCAA is investigating a LOIC in Happy Valley right now. After today, I'm not exactly sure if there was any controlling of anything related to that university. The incompetence defense for Curley and Schultz may let them off the hook but it makes their former employer look absolutely incompetent in turn.
