D
dat dude
Posts: 1,564
Nov 6, 2011 1:44am
[LEFT]
[INDENT]@bobwojnowskiBob Wojnowski[/INDENT]
Don't forget to turn your clocks back tonight to mark Bama and LSU turning football offense back half a century.
[/LEFT]
[INDENT]@bobwojnowskiBob Wojnowski[/INDENT]Don't forget to turn your clocks back tonight to mark Bama and LSU turning football offense back half a century.
[/LEFT]
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Nov 6, 2011 6:36am
Without going back and reading all these posts, IMO last night's game didn't come close to matching the hype. The offenses were anemic, it was marred by stupid penalties, it featured some very puzzling decisions by the coaches, and TM7 was exposed for the thug he is, HOWEVER...LSU's defense is sick, one of the best defenses I've seen since the 'Canes of the 80', and this may very well carry them to the national title.
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Nov 6, 2011 7:09am
Are people really starting 2 doubt these teams now? Playing against each others defenses is the ONLY way they put up that bad of numbers offensively. The game was definitely a dissapointment though and nowhere near the hype and agree the osu/mich game was much much better. I still think these are the 2 best teams in the country and will win the BCS bowl games they are in. Also for the people saying they now have doubts and dont think they are that good heres a question. Name me 1 team who you would actually put money down 2 beat either of these teams on a neutral field.Not COULD beat(of course there are multiple teams that COULD) but WOULD beat them.
S
Sonofanump
Nov 6, 2011 7:44am
I feel asleep attempting to watch this game. All I can remember is that Bama needs a kicker.
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Nov 6, 2011 7:57am
Rotinaj;960015 wrote:Are people really starting 2 doubt these teams now? Playing against each others defenses is the ONLY way they put up that bad of numbers offensively. The game was definitely a dissapointment though and nowhere near the hype and agree the osu/mich game was much much better. I still think these are the 2 best teams in the country and will win the BCS bowl games they are in. Also for the people saying they now have doubts and dont think they are that good heres a question. Name me 1 team who you would actually put money down 2 beat either of these teams on a neutral field.Not COULD beat(of course there are multiple teams that COULD) but WOULD beat them.
How can you know who WOULD beat them until after the game? I would have no reservations putting money on Stanford,Boise St or Oklahoma or Okla St on a neutral field against either of these teams.
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Nov 6, 2011 8:03am
I didnt say they WOULD for a fact beat them. I said theres no way in hell id put money on any team against either of them.
pmoney25
Posts: 1,787
Nov 6, 2011 8:10am
Gtfo with Boise beating either of these teams. What you saw tonight is defenses filled with NFL players. i would not put any money on any team beating these two.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Nov 6, 2011 8:22am
sleeper;959949 wrote:You know the media would be making fun of B1G schools if they had put up this snoozer, but since its the SEC you won't hear much
slQQper
Benny The Jet
Posts: 2,987
Nov 6, 2011 8:42am
Good article on espn.com now from Wojciechowski. I like the opening line.
"TUSCALOOSA, Ala. -- If that was The Game of the Century, then I want my 100 years back.Top-ranked LSU's 9-6 overtime win against No. 2 Alabama Saturday evening wasn't the game of the century, decade or season. I'm not even sure it was the game of the day."
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/7198549/no-need-see-sequel-lsu-tigers-alabama-crimson-tide
"TUSCALOOSA, Ala. -- If that was The Game of the Century, then I want my 100 years back.Top-ranked LSU's 9-6 overtime win against No. 2 Alabama Saturday evening wasn't the game of the century, decade or season. I'm not even sure it was the game of the day."
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/7198549/no-need-see-sequel-lsu-tigers-alabama-crimson-tide
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Nov 6, 2011 9:31am
I actually found the game pretty entertaining. You can't appreciate good football if you are on team "boring." Not every game has to be madden like with 60 pts being put on the board for it to be entertaining.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Nov 6, 2011 9:39am
game was retarded. only thing that came out of it was that the browns need to draft trent richardson
FatHobbit
Posts: 8,651
Nov 6, 2011 10:05am
If bama had a kicker nobody would be talking about how good lsu's defense is today...
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Nov 6, 2011 10:13am
rotinaj, no one is saying these teams aren't good lol we're saying this was hyped as the "game of the century" and two GREAT, complete teams...they may be great, but they're not complete..these offenses are not good and IMO this game didn't prove that they are unbeatable against a team like Stanford, Okla, Okla St, etc.
These are likely the two best teams in the country, but it's not clear cut like some are saying
These are likely the two best teams in the country, but it's not clear cut like some are saying
Cat Food Flambe'
Posts: 1,230
Nov 6, 2011 10:14am
Holy Cow - I agree with Sleeper for the second time in recorded history. The media will call this "two outstanding defenses". The same game in the Big Ten would be "two punchless, slow offenses".sleeper;959949 wrote:Forget good defense, this is just bad offense. You know the media would be making fun of B1G schools if they had put up this snoozer, but since its the SEC you won't hear much,
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Nov 6, 2011 10:30am
Cat Food Flambe';960147 wrote:Holy Cow - I agree with Sleeper for the second time in recorded history. The media will call this "two outstanding defenses". The same game in the Big Ten would be "two punchless, slow offenses".
Compare the OSU/Michigan State game this year to Bama/LSU. You don't think people are able to tell a difference?
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Nov 6, 2011 10:36am
I'd put money on Oklahoma State, Oklahoma, Boise, Stanford, and Wisconsin beating either of these teams on a neutral field. Neither of these teams have any offensive talent outside of Richardson for Alabama. These teams being ranked in the top ten is a complete farce, neither are any good.Rotinaj;960015 wrote:Are people really starting 2 doubt these teams now? Playing against each others defenses is the ONLY way they put up that bad of numbers offensively. The game was definitely a dissapointment though and nowhere near the hype and agree the osu/mich game was much much better. I still think these are the 2 best teams in the country and will win the BCS bowl games they are in. Also for the people saying they now have doubts and dont think they are that good heres a question. Name me 1 team who you would actually put money down 2 beat either of these teams on a neutral field.Not COULD beat(of course there are multiple teams that COULD) but WOULD beat them.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Nov 6, 2011 10:38am
I actually hope LSU wins out so they can be exposed for the fraud they are against a real team.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Nov 6, 2011 11:07am
compare notre dame to indiana...do you think people will be able to tell a difference?karen lotz;960158 wrote:Compare the OSU/Michigan State game this year to Bama/LSU. You don't think people are able to tell a difference?
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Nov 6, 2011 11:20am
I can tell you this. If LSU wins out, they will be at least a 5-7-point favorite in the BCSNCG. Alabama, likely goes 11-1, will be an even bigger favorite in the Sugar Bowl. We may very possibly see LSU/Oklahoma State and Alabama/Boise State. People might get their wish.
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Nov 6, 2011 1:50pm
No If Boise St beat Alabama in that scenario people would just say Alabama didn't care about that game because they were disappointed not being in the NC game just like when Alabama was stomped by Utah in the Sugar Bowl in 2009. Many people used that excuse.Azubuike24;960209 wrote:I can tell you this. If LSU wins out, they will be at least a 5-7-point favorite in the BCSNCG. Alabama, likely goes 11-1, will be an even bigger favorite in the Sugar Bowl. We may very possibly see LSU/Oklahoma State and Alabama/Boise State. People might get their wish.
S
Sonofanump
Nov 6, 2011 1:50pm
My wish would be Stanford vs LSU.
GoJPM!
Posts: 799
Nov 6, 2011 2:18pm
What a disaster.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Nov 6, 2011 2:36pm
+1Skyhook79;960355 wrote:No If Boise St beat Alabama in that scenario people would just say Alabama didn't care about that game because they were disappointed not being in the NC game just like when Alabama was stomped by Utah in the Sugar Bowl in 2009. Many people used that excuse.
C
cats gone wild
Posts: 2,651
Nov 6, 2011 3:53pm
Wow, cant believe all the negative talk about Bama and LSU and "how bad they are". As Ive said a million times, defense wins championships. It dont matter if teams are scoring 50+ points all year. You see what happens to them in bowl games. Ok St, OK, ORE, Stanford, and Boise are playing cupcakes and giving up alot of points to them. These teams would fall flat on their face vs. LSU or Bama and would get smoked. How many close calls have those teams had this year already? How many close calls have Bama or LSU had? ZERO! How soon people forget how bad LSU and Bama have beaten Oregon, PSU, Arkansas, WVU, Aub (2 of them are top 10 teams). Those teams didnt have great defenses.
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Nov 6, 2011 3:54pm
At some point the line is drawn between defensive excellence to offensive ineptitude, and last night was an example of a game that crosses that line.