Syracuse and Pittsburgh to the ACC??

Home Archive College Sports Syracuse and Pittsburgh to the ACC??
T

trep14

Senior Member

842 posts
Sep 19, 2011 11:33 AM
I don't really see the B1G expanding unless they can get Notre Dame.
Sep 19, 2011 11:33am
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Sep 19, 2011 11:37 AM
Iliketurtles;902988 wrote:Link?? I thought Kansas had no chance at going to a conference like the B1G because they aren't a football school powerhouse and no one cares about basketball since basketball doesn't matter at all in the realignment of teams and conferences!

Kansas isn't joining the Big Ten
Sep 19, 2011 11:37am
M

Manhattan Buckeye

Senior Member

7,566 posts
Sep 19, 2011 11:37 AM
trep14;902990 wrote:I don't really see the B1G expanding unless they can get Notre Dame.
and Texas.

Those pleading for 4 16-team conferences are just wishing for symmetry. Notre Dame, Texas, and if one of the two comes Missouri is the only expansion. Anything else is diluting the conference, and the Big 10 doesn't need to dilute.
Sep 19, 2011 11:37am
jordo212000's avatar

jordo212000

Senior Member

10,664 posts
Sep 19, 2011 12:11 PM
Iliketurtles;902988 wrote:Link?? I thought Kansas had no chance at going to a conference like the B1G because they aren't a football school powerhouse and no one cares about basketball since basketball doesn't matter at all in the realignment of teams and conferences!
Oh boy here we go again
Sep 19, 2011 12:11pm
Iliketurtles's avatar

Iliketurtles

Senior Member

8,191 posts
Sep 19, 2011 12:26 PM
karen lotz;902998 wrote:Kansas isn't joining the Big Ten
I know it was a joke.
Sep 19, 2011 12:26pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Sep 19, 2011 12:29 PM
karen lotz;902998 wrote:Kansas isn't joining the Big Ten
Are you saying Kansas won't go to the Big 10 or the Big 10 won't admit Kansas?
Sep 19, 2011 12:29pm
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Sep 19, 2011 12:52 PM
S&L, what's the word around Rutgers about the possibilty of applying for admission to the B1G? is there any??
Sep 19, 2011 12:52pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Sep 19, 2011 1:11 PM
SportsAndLady;903072 wrote:Are you saying Kansas won't go to the Big 10 or the Big 10 won't admit Kansas?

I'm saying Kansas will not be in the Big Ten.
Sep 19, 2011 1:11pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Sep 19, 2011 1:39 PM
vball10set;903108 wrote:S&L, what's the word around Rutgers about the possibilty of applying for admission to the B1G? is there any??
No comment lol
Sep 19, 2011 1:39pm
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Sep 19, 2011 1:43 PM
SportsAndLady;903166 wrote:No comment lol
plausible deniability...well played!!!
Sep 19, 2011 1:43pm
M

Manhattan Buckeye

Senior Member

7,566 posts
Sep 19, 2011 9:58 PM
The Big 10 doesn't need to expand. Period. They have the schools they want and the revenue they want. Adding schools that don't add to the bottom line isn't their plan. They have 12 teams, they have a championship game, they have what they want. As I mentioned above, some people want a perfect symmetry in the conferences, but the Big 10 has no pressure at all to expand.
Sep 19, 2011 9:58pm
j_crazy's avatar

j_crazy

7 gram rocks. how i roll.

8,372 posts
Sep 19, 2011 10:45 PM
I'm hearing if the acc works out a good deal UND will be #15. Twitter but still.
Sep 19, 2011 10:45pm
B

bigkahuna

Senior Member

4,454 posts
Sep 19, 2011 10:51 PM
I would actually be alright with this if the B1G just sat back and said piss off to everyone else. We have what we want, so why mess with it?
Sep 19, 2011 10:51pm
Little Danny's avatar

Little Danny

Senior Member

4,288 posts
Sep 19, 2011 10:55 PM
Manhattan Buckeye;903740 wrote:The Big 10 doesn't need to expand. Period. They have the schools they want and the revenue they want. Adding schools that don't add to the bottom line isn't their plan. They have 12 teams, they have a championship game, they have what they want. As I mentioned above, some people want a perfect symmetry in the conferences, but the Big 10 has no pressure at all to expand.
This.... the only thing that would change this decision would be if ND suddenly came knocking at the door with suitcase in tow.

Just because one conference moves to 14/16 games doesn't mean everyone else has to do it.
Sep 19, 2011 10:55pm
wildcats20's avatar

wildcats20

In ROY I Trust!!

27,794 posts
Sep 19, 2011 11:19 PM
Little Danny;903819 wrote:This.... the only thing that would change this decision would be if ND suddenly came knocking at the door with suitcase in tow.

Just because one conference moves to 14/16 games doesn't mean everyone else has to do it.
Teams?

And while I agree, I think we will see the 4, 16 team conferences in the next year or 2(max). I don't like it all that much, but I think it is inevitable.
Sep 19, 2011 11:19pm
M

Manhattan Buckeye

Senior Member

7,566 posts
Sep 19, 2011 11:46 PM
Then who is the Big 10 taking? Notre Dame and Texas possibly.

Who is going to force the Big 10 to take 16 teams? Answer: no one.
Sep 19, 2011 11:46pm
wildcats20's avatar

wildcats20

In ROY I Trust!!

27,794 posts
Sep 19, 2011 11:49 PM
Manhattan Buckeye;903927 wrote:Then who is the Big 10 taking? Notre Dame and Texas possibly.

Who is going to force the Big 10 to take 16 teams? Answer: no one.
Couldn't the same be said for the league expanding to 12 teams?
Sep 19, 2011 11:49pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Sep 19, 2011 11:50 PM
wildcats20;903930 wrote:Couldn't the same be said for the league expanding to 12 teams?
gotta have 12 to have a title game.
Sep 19, 2011 11:50pm
wildcats20's avatar

wildcats20

In ROY I Trust!!

27,794 posts
Sep 19, 2011 11:52 PM
karen lotz;903932 wrote:gotta have 12 to have a title game.
Yes, I know. But a title game doesn't mean anything. The Big 10 had an auto berth to a BCS game regardless. It wasn't going to go away just because they might have stayed at 11.

In other words, the Big 10 added a 12th team so they could "keep up with the Jones'," so to speak. If the other conferences go to 16, so will the Big 10.
Sep 19, 2011 11:52pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Sep 19, 2011 11:56 PM
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Sep 19, 2011 11:56pm
wildcats20's avatar

wildcats20

In ROY I Trust!!

27,794 posts
Sep 19, 2011 11:58 PM
karen lotz;903941 wrote:$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
And so does 16 teams.
Sep 19, 2011 11:58pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Sep 20, 2011 12:04 AM
wildcats20;903943 wrote:And so does 16 teams.

Not necessarily. Splitting the pie 16 ways will make it less profitable on a school by school basis than 12. Unless the Big Ten adds Texas, Notre Dame, USC, and Alabama, they aren't going to bring in enough to make it worth it.
Sep 20, 2011 12:04am
krambman's avatar

krambman

Senior Member

3,606 posts
Sep 20, 2011 12:28 AM
wildcats20;903936 wrote:Yes, I know. But a title game doesn't mean anything. The Big 10 had an auto berth to a BCS game regardless. It wasn't going to go away just because they might have stayed at 11.

In other words, the Big 10 added a 12th team so they could "keep up with the Jones'," so to speak. If the other conferences go to 16, so will the Big 10.
That title game means a reported $20-25 million for the conference EACH YEAR from Fox for television the game. That's nearly $2 million per school every year. That's why they added a 12 team to add a championship game. That's revenue they wouldn't have been able to get any other way. They were able to add a team to the conference AND increase revenue for all 12 schools involved. That's impressive. They didn't to keep up with the Jones's, they are the Jones's.

The NY Times ran an article today about the geography of college football. It said that Ohio State is the most popular team in college football, followed by Michigan and Penn State. In fact 7 of the 12 teams in the B1G were in the top 20 in terms of popularity. That is why the B1G is the highest revenue generating conference in the country. They will only add teams if they increase that revenue for everyone. That means good programs with lots of fans in big TV markets (like Notre Dame and Texas). Unless a team would be in the top half of the B1G in terms of popularity or would get the BTN on TV in a big market (like Rutgers or maybe Missouri), then the B1G isn't going to be interested, because they don't want to divide the same revenue among more teams.
Sep 20, 2011 12:28am
M

Manhattan Buckeye

Senior Member

7,566 posts
Sep 20, 2011 1:08 AM
wildcats20;903936 wrote:Yes, I know. But a title game doesn't mean anything. The Big 10 had an auto berth to a BCS game regardless. It wasn't going to go away just because they might have stayed at 11.

In other words, the Big 10 added a 12th team so they could "keep up with the Jones'," so to speak. If the other conferences go to 16, so will the Big 10.
I wouldn't put it that way, the last two teams the Big 10 admitted were Penn St. and Nebraska. I'll repeat that. Penn St. and Nebraska.

The Big 10 won't grow just to grow. They might admit Missouri, possibly Kansas (I doubt the latter), they aren't expanding further unless there is a shamrock or longhorn involved.
Sep 20, 2011 1:08am
M

Manhattan Buckeye

Senior Member

7,566 posts
Sep 20, 2011 1:09 AM
No offense wildcats20, but you just got pwned.
Sep 20, 2011 1:09am