LJ;911684 wrote:$10,750 per worker per year. Or $206 per week. Less than they would get on unemployment.

Do you have a link? I didn't see any figures in the link I attached and the 2 embedded hyperlinks within were dead ends ad I'm not a subscriber to the Twin City paper.

BGFalcons82;911741 wrote:Do you have a link? I didn't see any figures in the link I attached and the 2 embedded hyperlinks within were dead ends ad I'm not a subscriber to the Twin City paper.

It said $1.72 million over 4 years. Then I just did the math.

You're not supposed to actually think about things like that LJ, you're just supposed to scream about socialism and such.

LJ;911684 wrote:$10,750 per worker per year. Or $206 per week. Less than they would get on unemployment.

I imagine they might also qualify for unemployment as well.

believer;911953 wrote:I imagine they might also qualify for unemployment as well.

Depends on the state