So if this happens, who do they make it over?jordo212000;883872 wrote:If they go undefeated this year I think they make it in.
1 loss SEC champion
Undefeated Stanford
1 loss Big 10 team
So if this happens, who do they make it over?jordo212000;883872 wrote:If they go undefeated this year I think they make it in.
Stanford? hahalhslep134;883873 wrote:So if this happens, who do they make it over?
1 loss SEC champion
Undefeated Stanford
1 loss Big 10 team
karen lotz;883870 wrote:Idaho has the same number of players in the NFL as Minnesota and 1 less than Indiana.
Then be firm in your opinion. You think they make it over an undefeated Pac-12 team? Or a 1 loss BCS conference school? To that I say you're crazy.jordo212000;883878 wrote:Stanford? haha
We'll have to see how the season shakes out, but I firmly believe that if they go undefeated, they'll make it to the National Title this year
and I firmly believe that if that happens it will based on sympathy, soccer mom mentality or the wussification factor, whatever you want to call it.jordo212000;883878 wrote:Stanford? haha
We'll have to see how the season shakes out, but I firmly believe that if they go undefeated, they'll make it to the National Title this year
Except that so far, multiple teams that Boise plays has more guys in the NFL than the two teams you cited in your argument. hahalhslep134;883880 wrote:Yeah, a punter, 3rd string QB, 4th string WR, and a backup guard.
1 starter, Iupati.
Players are clearly better in BCS conferences, which the argument I'm making, to which there is no counter argument. The statistics are ALL in my favor.
No, you said even the bad teams in BCS conferences put more players in the NFL than teams in Boise's conference. You said something about Minnesota and Indiana in comparison and I just gave you a handful of teams that seem to say the statistics are not ALL in your favor.lhslep134;883880 wrote:Yeah, a punter, 3rd string QB, 4th string WR, and a backup guard.
1 starter, Iupati.
Players are clearly better in BCS conferences, which the argument I'm making, to which there is no counter argument. The statistics are ALL in my favor.
Do you even watch Boise when they play? There is nothing fraudulent about them at all.ytownfootball;883884 wrote:and I firmly believe that if that happens it will based on sympathy, soccer mom mentality or the wussification factor, whatever you want to call it.
http://forums.nationalchamps.net/boards/showthread.php?t=5229karen lotz;883890 wrote:No, you said even the bad teams in BCS conferences put more players in the NFL than teams in Boise's conference. You said something about Minnesota and Indiana in comparison and I just gave you a handful of teams that seem to say the statistics are not ALL in your favor.
I already said the same thing. Here comes some backpedalingkaren lotz;883890 wrote:No, you said even the bad teams in BCS conferences put more players in the NFL than teams in Boise's conference. You said something about Minnesota and Indiana in comparison and I just gave you a handful of teams that seem to say the statistics are not ALL in your favor.
*sigh* Not hard to look good twice a year.jordo212000;883891 wrote:Do you even watch Boise when they play? There is nothing fraudulent about them at all.
Boise hasn't played them yet, they didn't play them last year, and those players in the NFL could be from 8 years ago.jordo212000;883887 wrote:Except that so far, multiple teams that Boise plays has more guys in the NFL than the two teams you cited in your argument. haha
smh that is the average per member. Ohio State, USC, Miami, et al are all going to inflate that number. What about Minnesota and Indiana? What are their numbers compared to Boise's rivals?lhslep134;883892 wrote:http://forums.nationalchamps.net/boards/showthread.php?t=5229
Enough said. Top to bottom it's not even close.
hmmm top to bottom or on a school by school basis? could you please pick one argument and stick with it?lhslep134;883892 wrote:http://forums.nationalchamps.net/boards/showthread.php?t=5229
Enough said. Top to bottom it's not even close.
uggh you were the one who brought this up? I know it is a flawed way of looking at it, I even told you so. Yet now I am having fun poking holes in your argument, as is Karenlhslep134;883895 wrote:Boise hasn't played them yet, they didn't play them last year, and those players in the NFL could be from 8 years ago.
Boise hasn't played them yet, they didn't play them last year, and those players in the NFL could be from 8 years ago.jordo212000;883887 wrote:Except that so far, multiple teams that Boise plays has more guys in the NFL than the two teams you cited in your argument. haha
lhslep134;883895 wrote:Boise hasn't played them yet, they didn't play them last year, and those players in the NFL could be from 8 years ago.
Does OSU or Boise only play 1 or 2 teams? Or do they play the whole conference. My argument is the conference one.karen lotz;883898 wrote:hmmm top to bottom or on a school by school basis? could you please pick one argument and stick with it?
No, but what relevance is TCU's NFL players if this is the first year Boise is playing them? You need to look at the WAC, where Boise resided the last few years.karen lotz;883904 wrote:lol, great point. Players from BCS conferences don't last in the NFL. Is that what you are saying?
Oh, I see.lhslep134;883905 wrote:Does OSU or Boise only play 1 or 2 teams? Or do they play the whole conference. My argument is the conference one.
I didn't bring up Indiana Minnesota, someone else did.
lhslep134;883861 wrote:You're right. The Indiana's and Minnesota's send more players to the NFL than any of Boise's bottom tier conference opponents, so those teams aren't as bad as Indiana or Minnesota, they're worse.
Please, kind sir, address the rest of my NFL draft post.karen lotz;883910 wrote:Oh, I see.
smh, your original point was that Indiana and Minnesota send more guys to the NFL. Well, we are looking at who Boise plays and multiple teams that they play this year have more players than Minnesota or Indiana.lhslep134;883902 wrote:Boise hasn't played them yet, they didn't play them last year, and those players in the NFL could be from 8 years ago.
Look at who gets sent to the NFL on a yearly basis:
2008:
WAC: 8
Big 10: 29
2009:
WAC: 10
Big 10: 28
2010:
WAC:5
Big 10: 34
2011:
WAC: 16
Big 10: 29
That's not even delving further in 1st round talents which would only bolster my argument.
Please entertain me with a counter...