queencitybuckeye;798536 wrote:Educated by whom? I sure as hell don't want a dime of tax money spent on it. If we were to have another child (shoot me), our family doctor would do the only educating we would require.

Con_Alma;798564 wrote:It has been a "choice" for many, many years. It wasn't forced on people. They chose to do it. The government shouldn't be deciding that people should no longer choose this, be it necessary or not.

Educated as in, if you think it's bad get groups to do PSAs/attempt to explain to doctors/parents why your position is correct. Didn't mean government.

I Wear Pants;798431 wrote:Why does everyone think everything is an anti-Jewish thing?

The people who are for this ban simply disagree with you that circumcision is akin to piecing ears. They believe it to be a unreversable mutilation of the body and that people should be free to make that decision for themselves when they are adults. I don't exactly agree with that but they aren't busybodies because they disagree with you.

I do agree that parents piercing a child's ears or having them tattooed would be equitable to circumcision, by any letter of the law. As long as parents are allowed to do those two things, there should be no law against circumcision. It's inconsistent.

queencitybuckeye;798535 wrote:The new guy.

I'd say. Nobody else would want that job.

"Excuse me! Did you have your child's foreskin removed?" GTFO, creep!

I Wear Pants;798842 wrote:Educated as in, if you think it's bad get groups to do PSAs/attempt to explain to doctors/parents why your position is correct. Didn't mean government.

I wouldn't have a problem with that at all.

tk421;798356 wrote:I don't know a single guy who needs to be more sensitive. Talk about not lasting long at all.

Maybe you're just that good at getting them off?

I Wear Pants;798842 wrote:Educated as in, if you think it's bad get groups to do PSAs/attempt to explain to doctors/parents why your position is correct. Didn't mean government.

My position on this issue isn't for or against. My position is that the parents should have the ability to have a position and a State law put in place by the government does not afford that choice.

Little Danny;796584 wrote:California never heard about one's right to choose?

Or they have seance the idea is the baby can not make the choice??

bo shemmy3337;799462 wrote:Or they have seance the idea is the baby can not make the choice??

Seance? Did they summon the ghosts of foreskins past?