Fidmeister;702867 wrote:If for some reason he was fired, they could fill the job in about a week, tops. Who wouldn't want the job?
If they are put on probation and lose schlorships,alot of coaches might not want it
Fidmeister;702867 wrote:If for some reason he was fired, they could fill the job in about a week, tops. Who wouldn't want the job?
Fidmeister;702861 wrote:And you would be running Florida to the gallows with the same report.
Ty Webb;702875 wrote:If they are put on probation and lose schlorships,alot of coaches might not want it
elbuckeye28;702876 wrote:First of all, you don't know what I would be saying about Florida. For the sake of your argument, let's assume that I would. That does not make it any less absurd to believe an unnamed source without any further proof.
Fab1b;702878 wrote:And Ty or whoever you decide to log in as would be on here defending Florida, it's no different both ways!
Fidmeister;702882 wrote:Florida a completely random school. Could just as easily have been Texas, Oklahoma, et. al.
Fab1b;702892 wrote:Bullshit Ty
Ty Webb;702895 wrote:Believe what you want my man....I'm not as big a douche as you might think
ytownfootball;702902 wrote:Bwahhhhahahhah
Seriously...we're talking about lack of institutional control?...Tressel getting fired?
Un Fucking Believable
Ty Webb;702905 wrote:My response was in response to Fab saying I wouldn't be on here riding Muschamps ass if this story was about him instead of Tressel
charliehustle14;702682 wrote:I don't know much about Yahoo Sports (never was impressed with it so I don't read much on there) but these 2 guys are supposed to be veteran journalists. Making such a lofty acquisition and turning it into fact right out of the gate without an identified source or evidence is pretty low class.
You're kidding right?ytownfootball;702914 wrote:You Einsteins that claim lack of institutional control are out of your fucking minds. Period. Ohio State has been one of if not the most scrutinized programs since 2002. Lack of institutional control has been levied very , very few times, and these allegations, IF PROVEN to be true don't EVEN COME CLOSE to warranting such a penalty.
Ty Webb;702918 wrote:You're kidding right?
ytownfootball;702914 wrote:You Einsteins that claim lack of institutional control are out of your fucking minds. Period. Ohio State has been one of if not the most scrutinized programs since 2002. Lack of institutional control has been levied very , very few times, and these allegations, IF PROVEN to be true don't EVEN COME CLOSE to warranting such a penalty.
Ty Webb;702918 wrote:You're kidding right?
ytownfootball;702923 wrote:Just be aware that there's a difference between being scrutinized and having been found guilty of something, not surprisingly you seem to be confusing the two.
USCytownfootball;702919 wrote:Fuck and no.
Fidmeister;702921 wrote:If this is true, it's the definition of a lack of institutional control. Had he told the NCAA when they investigated that he knew about this months before and did nothing, we'd know by now. Ohio State would have hammered him, I believe.
This, if true, is a lot like Bruce Pearl lying to NCAA investigators. The punishment should be every bit as severe.
Also, if this turns out to be true, you can kiss that appeal goodbye. There would be no way the NCAA would shorten the suspensions.
Ty Webb;702925 wrote:USC
Florida
Alabama
LSU
Oregon
All five of those teams have been more scutinized than Ohio State