ccrunner609;662689 wrote:So what you are saying is that you would do Snooki before Kesha?
No, I'd let Snooki give me head before I'd do anything within a 79 mile radius of Kesha.
ccrunner609;662689 wrote:So what you are saying is that you would do Snooki before Kesha?
rydawg5;662601 wrote:Why do married men make these polls?
power i;662967 wrote:Fab, these guys on here are pretty picky when it comes to their fantasies. I think we should take their pics and send them to the 10 women listed and see how they respond.
power i;662967 wrote:Fab, these guys on here are pretty picky when it comes to their fantasies. I think we should take their pics and send them to the 10 women listed and see how they respond.
Fab4Runner;662948 wrote:I seriously don't know why everyone thinks Khloe Kardashian is so fat. She isn't. She is obviously bigger than her sisters but she is not huge.
gut;663550 wrote:Chloe Kardashian is absolutely hideous - and crude can be hot for some girls (usually if they are hot) but it doesn't remotely work for her. If Seinfeld ever did a "man face" episode (I think they did), she'd be perfect for it!
FatHobbit;663637 wrote:She looks like Hagrid in that pic.
gut;663734 wrote:That's what she really looks like naturally in an untouched photo. I saw them together on the Tonight Show a while back and she was even more breathtakingly ugly. Words like "beastly" and "sasquatch" spring to mind. She has a chin that looks like someone took a shovel to. Seriously. I'd heard of Chloe but don't think I'd ever seen her. Remember thinking "yikes, that sister really got the short-end of the gene pool"
Not hideous, if you like sasquatch's that look like pre-op transexuals...Kind of a lighter-skinned, thicker brunette version of JWow...But no uglier than anyone else who's been hit by a shovel.Fab4Runner;663768 wrote:It's Khloe. And if she is hideous then at least 50% of the population is ridiculously, horribly, disgustingly hideous.