thedemoralizer7;899459 wrote:Rittmans Defense is not bad! they kept them in the game. The offense however is so predictible and easy to stop.. Also did anyone see dennis's quote in the paper??! "I can not rebuild a program in 4 games if anyone has a magic wand then let me know" Are you kidding me!!! the program was already rebuilt you just destroyed it again!!
The guy is a knucklehead. I'm thanking the lucky stars he didn't come to the Emerald City.
Just tell me this: Did he call the screen pass?
Havin Fun;899472 wrote:The Rittman program was successful last year on the backs of a strong senior class that graduated. The Program itself was never rebuilt, that is why the coach quit when his seniors left. Bescanson knew there was no way they could win this year. My problem with the new coach is trying to run an offense that will never win you games in the WCAL and playing his son who looks like a Jr. High athlete at best.
Success is never just on people. The most talented kids in Ohio won't win without good coaching. I was talking with someone last night who watched Rittman play, and he said there is some talent on that team. The guy knows football better than about anyone I know, so I really have no reason to doubt him.
The fact of the matter is, this coach has a track record, as did Besancon (that's how you spell it, by the way

). Everywhere Besancon went, the team improved, New London included. You can't tell me that was all just talent, and he left when it was over.
I've played under Besancon (as an assistant at Smithville). He's a disciplinarian to the core. He is a good teacher, but he also expects perfection. He was always his players' biggest fan and harshest critic. I think that style of coaching, and coaching in a program where, every year, he got to see what it takes for a team to win, has led to him helping the teams succeed wherever he goes.
Conversely, Dennis also has a track record. It's basically the opposite of Besancon's, at least in terms of success, though I might suspect in other areas as well.
1_beast;899479 wrote:Bescancon left because he wanted the Smithville job!
You might be right. He originally left Smithville because he wanted a head coaching job. It's good to see him back.
Wooster All-Sport;899529 wrote:Looking forward to Waynedale v. Smithville next week. Could finally get a close WCL game but kinda think one of the teams will win by at least 10.
That would be a fairly close game. I'm gonna try to make it to either that one or the Hillsdale one.
luckydog;899561 wrote:you got to be kidding me, real freaking class act there boy...
The onside kick is a bit much, but I guess if there is bad blood between the two for the game, it could happen. Still kind of ugly.
luckydog;899561 wrote: Hats off to Schrock for not hangin' a 100 on us last nite, he put his JV boys in when they were up 42 thank goodness, gave our JV boys a chance to play.
You know, it might sound weird to say this, but the Dalton D didn't look terrible. They had a hard time containing the QB on the run, which led to some long scores early, but that D was scrappy, and I can appreciate that.
Are the Dogs young this year? They looked smaller in size than the Dalton teams I remember, but then, I remember playing against Stutz, who I got to see on the Dalton sidelines last night.