Bigdogg;794718 wrote:You did not even read the article. Here is another source.

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/11_20/b4228029534552_page_2.htm

I don't give a rat's ass about the article. I cared about your silly blog posting that you claimed is always true, or else you'd leave. It isn't always true and you're still here - your ounce of credibility is dried up.

Sorry boys not going anywhere because of semantics. Do any of you really care that Bob Evans just took you to the cleaners? At lest admit that there is cause for concern.

Semantics my ass. Words mean things -- and you very specifically wrote the company has "no restaurants" when obviously, that's not true.

Go ahead and stay, but you might consider a name change: welcherdogg sounds about right.

Bigdogg;795819 wrote:Sorry boys not going anywhere because of semantics. Do any of you really care that Bob Evans just took you to the cleaners? At lest admit that there is cause for concern.

You were caught in a baldfaced lie. Semantics are not involved here. Do you actually know what the word means?

Writerbuckeye;795880 wrote:Semantics my ass. Words mean things -- and you very specifically wrote the company has "no restaurants" when obviously, that's not true.

Go ahead and stay, but you might consider a name change: welcherdogg sounds about right.

footputter?

Butler County has lost nearly 1,300 jobs in the first six months of this year and about 3,500 jobs since 2009, according to county and state data.

No county in the region — including Montgomery, Preble, Warren, Clermont or Hamilton — has suffered more mass layoffs since July 2010 than Butler County, according to Workforce One of Butler County. And new job creation, so far this year, has failed to keep pace.

Looks like Kasich focus like a laser is not doing much good.

Liz Claiborne officials dealt another blow this week when they announced they would be closing their West Chester Twp. distribution center, which puts about 400 jobs at risk of leaving the county. They could join West Chester’s BAE Systems, which will lay off 125 employees in July, and FedEx, which laid off 222 workers, and MISA Metals in Middletown, which laid off 79 workers in May.

Sure hope this don't effect poor fish!

http://www.middletownjournal.com/news/middletown-news/county-no-1-in-job-loss-for-region-1180580.html

Bigdogg;796169 wrote:Looks like Kasich focus like a laser is not doing much good.



Sure hope this don't effect poor fish!

http://www.middletownjournal.com/news/middletown-news/county-no-1-in-job-loss-for-region-1180580.html

Nope. All my income comes from my fraudulent 501(c)(3). I'm pretty bulletproof.

Actually, everything Kasich has done to date have all been major steps in the right direction. I am even amazed at the bold policies and the speed with which he is getting things done. At a minimum, he will save the state; and on the long end he will likely return it to a growth state, so long as the unions do not again stand in the way of progress with their often-typical divisive tactics. They are the major disincentive to potential investment in Ohio, and that is probably the little secret that no one wants to readily admit. Hopefully those days are over and with the governor's leadership and our new direction we can begin to grow again (although until the radical regime in the White House is purged, we will not achieve our potential).

Just keep in mind that, no matter what happens in Ohio in the future, you folks voted for this guy. His success or failure is your responsibility.

stlouiedipalma;797541 wrote:Just keep in mind that, no matter what happens in Ohio in the future, you folks voted for this guy. His success or failure is your responsibility.

The idea that the governor (or the government) of a state is the main factor in the success or failure of the state is the kind of chuckleheaded nonsense that got us where we are in various states and nationally. Getting the state the hell out of the way of those who actually create jobs is about the best a governor can do, and any tinkering beyond that always, repeat always, repeat ALWAYS does nothing but delay or deny any economic benefit.

queencitybuckeye;797576 wrote:The idea that the governor (or the government) of a state is the main factor in the success or failure of the state is the kind of chuckleheaded nonsense that got us where we are in various states and nationally. Getting the state the hell out of the way of those who actually create jobs is about the best a governor can do, and any tinkering beyond that always, repeat always, repeat ALWAYS does nothing but delay or deny any economic benefit.

Amen!

queencitybuckeye;797576 wrote:The idea that the governor (or the government) of a state is the main factor in the success or failure of the state is the kind of chuckleheaded nonsense that got us where we are in various states and nationally. Getting the state the hell out of the way of those who actually create jobs is about the best a governor can do, and any tinkering beyond that always, repeat always, repeat ALWAYS does nothing but delay or deny any economic benefit.

Perhaps you mistook my comment as a criticism of Kasich. It wasn't intended to be critical of anyone but the voters of Ohio. You elected this man to do what you feel is right. If, at the end of his time as Governor, he has driven the state off the cliff you will have no one to blame but yourselves.


Of course, if he is successful you'll look like all-stars.

queencitybuckeye;797576 wrote:The idea that the governor (or the government) of a state is the main factor in the success or failure of the state is the kind of chuckleheaded nonsense that got us where we are in various states and nationally. Getting the state the hell out of the way of those who actually create jobs is about the best a governor can do, and any tinkering beyond that always, repeat always, repeat ALWAYS does nothing but delay or deny any economic benefit.

Is that your opinion also regarding the President of the United States our do you admit that you are nothing but a partisan hack?

Bigdogg;802022 wrote:Is that your opinion also regarding the President of the United States our do you admit that you are nothing but a partisan hack?

Yes, the POTUS needs to get out of the way, which first and foremost includes massive spending cuts.

There's nothing partisan about knowing that the least government is the best government. Smart people know this, idiots do not.

"Get out of the way". A Tea Party quote if ever I heard one. The problem I see with all you teapartiers is that your only solution to a problem is "get out of the way". You do know that deregulation isn't the answer to the problem, don't you? Smart people know this. Idiots obviously don't.

stlouiedipalma;802030 wrote:"Get out of the way". A Tea Party quote if ever I heard one. The problem I see with all you teapartiers is that your only solution to a problem is "get out of the way". You do know that deregulation isn't the answer to the problem, don't you? Smart people know this. Idiots obviously don't.

When people who can barely string together a complete and correct sentence have nothing of substance to say, they categorize others, usually incorrectly.

Hahahahahahahaha! Go back and get more advice from Dick Armey. You've spouted his mantra so much I can't believe his picture isn't part of your avatar.

stlouiedipalma;802041 wrote:Hahahahahahahaha! Go back and get more advice from **** Armey. You've spouted his mantra so much I can't believe his picture isn't part of your avatar.

You are incapable of original thought, aren't you? What's next, Faux News and Rush?

Let's see...Clinton was president during one of our biggest economic booms in a long time. What did he do, exactly?

Oh that's right...nothing.

He had a GOP controlled Congress which had cut spending and curbed welfare. He went along with it.

He didn't increase government spending or controls; he pretty much stayed out of the way of business, and let things grow on their own. And they did, in a very dramatic way, until about the last few quarters of his presidency, when the inevitable economic downturn began as part of the natural cycle that happens where capitalism is involved.

Writerbuckeye;802069 wrote:Let's see...Bush was president during one of our biggest economic booms in a long time. What did he do, exactly?

Oh that's right...He gave us tax cuts and sent us into two wars sending the debt skyrocketing.
He had a GOP controlled Congress which increased spending and government and gave out corperate welfare. He went along with it.

He increased government spending and controls; he pretty much let business have their way on the backs of the Americakn public , and watched our economy die. And they did, in a very dramatic way, until about the last few quarters of his presidency, when the inevitable economic downturn began he blamed the clinton administration and democrats for the housing bubble.

Similar, yet different.

Thread Bomber;802112 wrote:Similar, yet different.

Please don't use facts on this happy group of idiots here. You will be beaten down and scorned and called a liberal

Writerbuckeye;802069 wrote:Let's see...Clinton was president during one of our biggest economic booms in a long time. What did he do, exactly?

Oh that's right...nothing.

He had a GOP controlled Congress which had cut spending and curbed welfare. He went along with it.

He didn't increase government spending or controls; he pretty much stayed out of the way of business, and let things grow on their own. And they did, in a very dramatic way, until about the last few quarters of his presidency, when the inevitable economic downturn began as part of the natural cycle that happens where capitalism is involved.

He was however entertaing and made cigars very fashionable again, along with leaving the presidency with the highest ever approval rating!

Thread Bomber;802112 wrote:Similar, yet different.

Good Lord what leftist babble. More Bush Derangement Syndrome and the man hasn't been in office for more than three years.

Bigdogg;802158 wrote:... the highest ever approval rating!

He hit it and quit it. What would you expect?

Writerbuckeye;802069 wrote:Let's see...Clinton was president during one of our biggest economic booms in a long time. What did he do, exactly?

Oh that's right...nothing.

He had a GOP controlled Congress which had cut spending and curbed welfare. He went along with it.

He didn't increase government spending or controls; he pretty much stayed out of the way of business, and let things grow on their own. And they did, in a very dramatic way, until about the last few quarters of his presidency, when the inevitable economic downturn began as part of the natural cycle that happens where capitalism is involved.

But his VP did invent the internet during that time period