gorocks99 wrote:
Women wouldn't be involved in this war, it's not taking place in the kitchen.
mexappeal12 wrote:
gorocks99 wrote:
Women wouldn't be involved in this war, it's not taking place in the kitchen.
You can't war on an empty stomach... we will poison your meals if you don't listen to us
Heretic wrote:
mexappeal12 wrote:
gorocks99 wrote:
Women wouldn't be involved in this war, it's not taking place in the kitchen.
You can't war on an empty stomach... we will poison your meals if you don't listen to us
.....
She's got us there. Now I know why our forefathers were intelligent enough not to let women out of the kitchen to get an education. If I'm in a war, I'm sure as hell not going to make my own sandwich....
mexappeal12 wrote:
tk421 wrote:
mexappeal12 wrote:
gorocks99 wrote:
Women wouldn't be involved in this war, it's not taking place in the kitchen.
You can't war on an empty stomach... we will poison your meals if you don't listen to us
I have no clue what's going on, but I'm stay close (creepy)
to the women.
Good boy... listen to the ladies or you get no vaj and we will poison your meals
Ok, first off, women are not needed in war for food, they are needed as prostitutes. Let's think about it, the only time women have ever been needed in war was for prostitution. We men will hunt and kill our food or just eat our MRE's. We don't need women for that. However, we do need certain things sexually from you women, plus, in this tough economy, it's a way for you to make some extra money.
Just practice this line "me so horny, me love you long time." Worked in Vietnam and it will work on the freehuddle war to!
GoChiefs wrote:
tk421 wrote:
The best chefs in the world are guys.
But most of them are queer.
Eh, name one gay chef. He didn't say hairdressers, he said chefs.
