Pick6
Posts: 14,946
May 25, 2011 8:13pm
"OMG we are the steelers, we are the toughest, hardest hitting team so the NFL makes these new rules because they have it out for us!!" blah blah blah
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
May 25, 2011 8:20pm
Pick6;780722 wrote:"OMG we are the steelers, we are the toughest, hardest hitting team so the NFL makes these new rules because they have it out for us!!" blah blah blah
And Harrison is the biggest whiner of them all. I legitimately believe he is mentally retarded or brain damaged...DEAD serious. He's good, mind you, but I think that's "retard strength."(<<<and I'm not saying that to make fun of the mentally challenged. Known fact their strength can be ridiculous)
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
May 25, 2011 8:24pm
He is a dumbass for sure....remember his refusal to meet the president shenanigans
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
May 25, 2011 8:27pm
He's just dumb. His "retirement" threat after those fines also. Must be sharing the same water with Osama Mendenhall.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
May 25, 2011 9:17pm
You said "the attitude" started last year with that Ward hit. What "attitude" were you referring to in your response to OQB's post? Because I think he made it pretty clear what "attitude" and type of play he was talking about.BR1986FB;780664 wrote:Where in my post did I say I wanted them to "play dirty" or "use their helmet as a spear?" I still think Ward's hit was clean but a tad late.
See OQB's post. Did he actually use the words "dirty play"? Obviously not. However, hoping for fines for too hard of a hit and hitting the QB late sure sounds like "dirty play" to me.......like_that;780718 wrote:As Br said, no one has ever said anything about dirty play. Nice fail.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
May 25, 2011 9:22pm
Appropriate nickname since it will probably take Cleveland 10 years to subdue him.BR1986FB;780741 wrote:He's just dumb. His "retirement" threat after those fines also. Must be sharing the same water with Osama Mendenhall.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
May 25, 2011 9:22pm
killer_ewok;780833 wrote:You said "the attitude" started last year with that Ward hit. What "attitude" were you referring to in your response to OQB's post? Because I think he made it pretty clear what "attitude" and type of play he was talking about.
There's a BIG difference between having game changing players with an "attitude" that will light you up when you come across the middle. Troy Polamalu, imo, is a player who will light you up who plays CLEAN. James Harrison is NOT.
I'd prefer Browns players intimidate in more of a "Troy Polamalu way" than a "James Harrison way." Don't advocate spearing or cheapshots nor will I ever. Good, clean, bone jarring hits that will make an offensive player lose control of his body functions I have NO issue with.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
May 25, 2011 9:23pm
Sooooo......was OQB referring to the "Polamalu" way or the "Harrison" way with his detailed post (which you replied to by stating that "attitude" started last year with Ward's hit)?BR1986FB;780840 wrote:There's a BIG difference between having game changing players with an "attitude" that will light you up when you come across the middle. Troy Polamalu, imo, is a player who will light you up who plays CLEAN. James Harrison is NOT.
I'd prefer Browns players intimidate in more of a "Troy Polamalu way" than a "James Harrison way." Don't advocate spearing or cheapshots nor will I ever. Good, clean, bone jarring hits that will make an offensive player lose control of his body functions I have NO issue with.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
May 25, 2011 9:28pm
killer_ewok;780839 wrote:Appropriate nickname since it will probably take Cleveland 10 years to subdue him.
Funny, but I don't think Mendenhall has eclipsed 100 yards in a game against the Browns yet unless he did it in his rookie season.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
May 25, 2011 9:30pm
killer_ewok;780841 wrote:Sooooo......was OQB referring to the "Polamalu" way or the "Harrison" way with his detailed post (which you replied to by stating that "attitude" started last year with Ward's hit)?
Couldn't tell you about the "fines, etc" part but I do know the 'attitude" I was referring to was the intimidation factor that Ward now has over opposing receivers.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
May 25, 2011 9:31pm
3 TD's in two games against them last season. Not great but not bad IMO.BR1986FB;780849 wrote:Funny, but I don't think Mendenhall has eclipsed 100 yards in a game against the Browns yet unless he did it in his rookie season.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
May 25, 2011 9:33pm
killer_ewok;780855 wrote:3 TD's in two games against them last season. Not great but not bad IMO.
Not bad at all but the Browns haven't had much problem containing Pittsburgh's running game since Fast Willie left. Most of those TD's were probably short rushes set up by TheRapist's passing.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
May 25, 2011 9:36pm
Well put. Ben typically gets in that ass when he plays the Browns.BR1986FB;780862 wrote:Not bad at all but the Browns haven't had much problem containing Pittsburgh's running game since Fast Willie left. Most of those TD's were probably short rushes set up by TheRapist's passing.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
May 25, 2011 9:38pm
killer_ewok;780874 wrote:Well put. Ben typically gets in that ass when he plays the Browns.
No denying that. They've (Browns) only been successful against him once. Proof is in the results.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
May 25, 2011 9:41pm
Yep.BR1986FB;780879 wrote:No denying that. They've (Browns) only been successful against him once. Proof is in the results.
Eh, the banter has been fun. We need something to pass the time until football season (assuming there is one). Take care.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
May 26, 2011 8:39am
BR1986FB;780879 wrote:No denying that. They've (Browns) only been successful against him once. Proof is in the results.
you mean the 8 sack game?
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
May 26, 2011 8:39am
killer_ewok;780888 wrote:We need something to pass the time until football season (assuming there is one).
No doubt.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
May 26, 2011 2:29pm
Writerbuckeye
Posts: 4,745
May 26, 2011 4:56pm
Saw the story about Donovan fighting leukemia (another story on BR's link). Sheesh. I think there must be a curse attached to the Browns play by play job.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
May 26, 2011 11:08pm
killer_ewok;780888 wrote:Yep.
Eh, the banter has been fun. We need something to pass the time until football season (assuming there is one). Take care.
or you could actually talk about your team in the steelers thread to pass that time.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
May 26, 2011 11:12pm
I do that too.DeyDurkie5;782650 wrote:or you could actually talk about your team in the steelers thread to pass that time.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
May 26, 2011 11:51pm
killer_ewok;782677 wrote:I do that too.
Stick to the steelers threads. I promise you, this thread will be just fine without you
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
May 27, 2011 12:48am
DeyDurkie5;782782 wrote:Stick to the steelers threads. I promise you, this thread will be just fine without you
I'm sure it would be. Not sure why some have a shit fit when a Steeler fan posts on a Browns thread like it's against the rules or taboo. If I was posting like Modell your request would make sense. I made some convo and that was it.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
May 27, 2011 5:08am
Ewok doesn't typically troll. It's when guys like Non/Capone (still convinced they are the same guy) get on here and spew some stupidity (i.e. Steeler fans are more knowledgeable because their team has been more successful) that I take issue. Ewok usually keeps it to football.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
May 27, 2011 8:27am
Agreed, no issue with Ewok's posts.