B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Dec 28, 2011 2:03pm
It's "do or die" for the Holmgren/Heckert regime as they are in year 3 out of 5. After craptastic 5-11 and likely 4-12 years in their first two they HAVE to show significant progress in year three. I'm not saying "playoffs" but if they lay another 5-11 "egg" there are going to more people calling for their heads than there currently are.like_that;1029004 wrote:Still ridiculous to make next season out to be do or die, as if the franchise is going anywhere.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08267/08267956b8a386530b56090faa49820aa0615a90" alt="OQB's avatar"
OQB
Posts: 6,679
Dec 28, 2011 2:05pm
Are you not tired of getting shit stomped by the AFC North? lol I know we need patience, but C'mon man!
I don't expect them to make the playoffs next year, but I would be happy with an 8-8/9-7 record with a wins over the steelers, ravens, and bengals.
I don't expect them to make the playoffs next year, but I would be happy with an 8-8/9-7 record with a wins over the steelers, ravens, and bengals.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08267/08267956b8a386530b56090faa49820aa0615a90" alt="OQB's avatar"
OQB
Posts: 6,679
Dec 28, 2011 2:06pm
exactly my point.BR1986FB;1029022 wrote:It's "do or die" for the Holmgren/Heckert regime as they are in year 3 out of 5. After craptastic 5-11 and likely 4-12 years in their first two they HAVE to show significant progress in year three. I'm not saying "playoffs" but if they lay another 5-11 "egg" there are going to more people calling for their heads than there currently are.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1da73/1da730efff03326445fb35ac5166005cbb876f87" alt="like_that's avatar"
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Dec 28, 2011 2:07pm
I agree there. Not improving next year is inexcusable, but for those expecting a playoff year, you are more likely to be dissapointed than satisfied.BR1986FB;1029022 wrote:It's "do or die" for the Holmgren/Heckert regime as they are in year 3 out of 5. After craptastic 5-11 and likely 4-12 years in their first two they HAVE to show significant progress in year three. I'm not saying "playoffs" but if they lay another 5-11 "egg" there are going to more people calling for their heads than there currently are.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Dec 28, 2011 2:09pm
I think most fans would be pleased with those records. Schedule will be significantly more difficult as I know they play the NFC East but also the AFC West.OQB;1029027 wrote:Are you not tired of getting shit stomped by the AFC North? lol I know we need patience, but C'mon man!![]()
I don't expect them to make the playoffs next year, but I would be happy with an 8-8/9-7 record with a wins over the steelers, ravens, and bengals.
Part of the reason I want them to move on at QB is that McCoy is 0-8 against the AFC North and hasn't looked even "serviceable" against the Steelers or Rats except for his first start ever against Pittsburgh.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Dec 28, 2011 2:10pm
No playoff year. Not with their schedule. If they upgrade I could see a couple of divisional wins though. Could've had three this year.like_that;1029035 wrote:I agree there. Not improving next year is inexcusable, but for those expecting a playoff year, you are more likely to be dissapointed than satisfied.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1da73/1da730efff03326445fb35ac5166005cbb876f87" alt="like_that's avatar"
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Dec 28, 2011 2:13pm
lol of course I am, but I am also a realist, and I know it's just not going to happen next year, unless we get this miracle season where everything goes our way. I would obviously be happy with those records, but i would also be happy with 7 wins and being competitive in most if not all the games.OQB;1029027 wrote:Are you not tired of getting shit stomped by the AFC North? lol I know we need patience, but C'mon man!![]()
I don't expect them to make the playoffs next year, but I would be happy with an 8-8/9-7 record with a wins over the steelers, ravens, and bengals.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79e97/79e97f67f2e42e4eb5ba600a0136c83d75ee8c0a" alt="Commander of Awesome's avatar"
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Dec 28, 2011 2:16pm
If we have 7 wins next season, are we going to hear the same whining that we should have been tanking since we're not going to the SB?
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Dec 28, 2011 2:21pm
I only think you hear that "whining" if they win 7 and leave 3 on the table after Shurmur pulls some butthole move to grasp defeat from the jaws of victory.Commander of Awesome;1029047 wrote:If we have 7 wins next season, are we going to hear the same whining that we should have been tanking since we're not going to the SB?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1da73/1da730efff03326445fb35ac5166005cbb876f87" alt="like_that's avatar"
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Dec 28, 2011 2:28pm
If they win 7, I can honestly see the team leaving 8 on the table, all being pattys fault lol.BR1986FB;1029054 wrote:I only think you hear that "whining" if they win 7 and leave 3 on the table after Shurmur pulls some butthole move to grasp defeat from the jaws of victory.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Dec 28, 2011 2:43pm
I think you'd hear more whining if they had the potential to win 10 yet only got 7 due to Shurmur gaffes. There are still fools that think this years team could've been a playoff team because of the close games they lost. :rolleyes:like_that;1029061 wrote:If they win 7, I can honestly see the team leaving 8 on the table, all being pattys fault lol.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08267/08267956b8a386530b56090faa49820aa0615a90" alt="OQB's avatar"
OQB
Posts: 6,679
Dec 28, 2011 2:56pm
lol I'd be happy with 7 wins....I'm just tired of this crap they call football.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Dec 28, 2011 2:57pm
I think a lot of people would be pleased with the increased wins and an offense that LOOKS like an offense. This "three 2 yard passes and a cloud of punts" offense sucks.OQB;1029097 wrote:lol I'd be happy with 7 wins....I'm just tired of this crap they call football.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08267/08267956b8a386530b56090faa49820aa0615a90" alt="OQB's avatar"
OQB
Posts: 6,679
Dec 28, 2011 2:59pm
exactly....I would be fine and support this regime if they went 7-9, but atleast make it exciting and put some touchdowns on the board....like 07.BR1986FB;1029099 wrote:I think a lot of people would be pleased with the increased wins and an offense that LOOKS like an offense. This "three 2 yard passes and a cloud of punts" offense sucks.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79e97/79e97f67f2e42e4eb5ba600a0136c83d75ee8c0a" alt="Commander of Awesome's avatar"
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Dec 28, 2011 3:07pm
We've actually been a much better offseason than any team since the 07 team. You guys forget 08,09,10 and how dreadful those offenses were. We don't have the wins to show it, but I think this current team is our best since 07 and I'm pretty optimistic heading forward. I think we'll get a new QB and some weapons this offseason.OQB;1029101 wrote:exactly....I would be fine and support this regime if they went 7-9, but atleast make it exciting and put some touchdowns on the board....like 07.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08267/08267956b8a386530b56090faa49820aa0615a90" alt="OQB's avatar"
OQB
Posts: 6,679
Dec 28, 2011 3:09pm
The problem this season is getting the ball in the endzone....sure we can move the ball, but if all you get is FG's it get's frustrating.Commander of Awesome;1029106 wrote:We've actually been a much better offseason than any team since the 07 team. You guys forget 08,09,10 and how dreadful those offenses were. We don't have the wins to show it, but I think this current team is our best since 07 and I'm pretty optimistic heading forward. I think we'll get a new QB and some weapons this offseason.
I agree, get a Real franchise QB and playmakers and we will be in good shape (fingers Crossed)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79e97/79e97f67f2e42e4eb5ba600a0136c83d75ee8c0a" alt="Commander of Awesome's avatar"
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Dec 28, 2011 3:14pm
But even that said, we're still a better offense than the last 3 yrs.OQB;1029108 wrote:The problem this season is getting the ball in the endzone....sure we can move the ball, but if all you get is FG's it get's frustrating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08267/08267956b8a386530b56090faa49820aa0615a90" alt="OQB's avatar"
OQB
Posts: 6,679
Dec 28, 2011 3:34pm
Total Offensive rankings:
2007: 8th, 25.1 ppg 10-6 record Crennel
2008: 31st, 14.5 ppg 4-12 record Crennel
2009: 32nd, 15.3 ppg 5-11 record Mangini
2010: 29th, 16.9 ppg 5-11 record Mangini
2011: 29th, 13.9 ppg 4-11 record Shurmur
stats came from NFL.com
2007: 8th, 25.1 ppg 10-6 record Crennel
2008: 31st, 14.5 ppg 4-12 record Crennel
2009: 32nd, 15.3 ppg 5-11 record Mangini
2010: 29th, 16.9 ppg 5-11 record Mangini
2011: 29th, 13.9 ppg 4-11 record Shurmur
stats came from NFL.com
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79e97/79e97f67f2e42e4eb5ba600a0136c83d75ee8c0a" alt="Commander of Awesome's avatar"
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Dec 28, 2011 3:42pm
Hmm thats interesting, from the eye test I thought we were much better than the past seasons.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/410a9/410a978581792d9f8b313336ad9405fb930b44ab" alt="DeyDurkie5's avatar"
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Dec 28, 2011 3:44pm
key stat..13.9 ppg
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1da73/1da730efff03326445fb35ac5166005cbb876f87" alt="like_that's avatar"
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Dec 28, 2011 3:54pm
If Hillis actually plays this whole season I think the stat would be 17 ppg.DeyDurkie5;1029152 wrote:key stat..13.9 ppg
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a28d/3a28d8d82ef8ea62413a3cf2f5308665d17dc3e7" alt="Heretic's avatar"
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Dec 28, 2011 3:58pm
That might be true. I think in his first start in place of Hillis, Hardesty single-handedly kept 10+ points off the board for you guys because of how he dropped every pass thrown to him AND THEY KEPT TRYING TO THROW TO HIM.like_that;1029158 wrote:If Hillis actually plays this whole season I think the stat would be 17 ppg.
But regardless, if you lose the one guy you think you can probably count on to do something for a good chunk of the year, there's going to be problems when you don't have viable back-up plans. Which they really didn't.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1da73/1da730efff03326445fb35ac5166005cbb876f87" alt="like_that's avatar"
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Dec 28, 2011 4:00pm
This is why I doubt they let him walk. They have RB figured out with him there, they don't need to add another need to the whole list of needs they currently have.Heretic;1029164 wrote:That might be true. I think in his first start in place of Hillis, Hardesty single-handedly kept 10+ points off the board for you guys because of how he dropped every pass thrown to him AND THEY KEPT TRYING TO THROW TO HIM.
But regardless, if you lose the one guy you think you can probably count on to do something for a good chunk of the year, there's going to be problems when you don't have viable back-up plans. Which they really didn't.
I think Phil Dawson most likely will be the "key" player that isn't resigned, if anyone.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Dec 28, 2011 5:53pm
by Marty Gitlin - WR Little explains recent success
WR Greg Little on his growing ability to
separate: "I've learned things to do when guys are showing press or playing off
me. It's about route-running and being on the same page with the quarterback."
Little, who has overcome a severe case of dropsies, averaged 8.3 YPC in his
first seven games and 14.0 since.
WR Greg Little on his growing ability to
separate: "I've learned things to do when guys are showing press or playing off
me. It's about route-running and being on the same page with the quarterback."
Little, who has overcome a severe case of dropsies, averaged 8.3 YPC in his
first seven games and 14.0 since.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Dec 28, 2011 8:12pm
Colts players can’t understand why fans would want them to lose
Posted by Michael David Smith on December 28, 2011, 6:34 PM EST
Reuters
The Colts head into Week 17 knowing that a loss would get them the first overall pick in the draft, while a win combined with a Rams loss would move the Colts into No. 2 in the draft order. And they know that for Colts fans who want Stanford quarterback Andrew Luck, that could mean cheering for them to lose.
But just because players know that mentality exists, that doesn’t mean they understand it.
“I don’t understand any of that,” Colts tight end Dallas Clark said, in comments distributed by the team. “I am just focused on trying to beat Jacksonville, and I think that everyone in this locker room’s goal is to do that.”
Colts defensive end Dwight Freeney said he gets why Colts fans would want to see the team get a great player in the draft, but he doesn’t have any interest in that discussion.
“I don’t care what pick we get,” Freeney said. “I have never cared. I don’t care if we have [any] first-round picks, I don’t care. It is just me. I go out there, I play hard every day and I let those who make those decisions worry about that. Those who play, we are worrying about playing and playing hard.”
Defensive end Robert Mathis responded to a question by saying that he doesn’t even want to talk about the issue.
“It is better not to respond to that at all,” Mathis said. “We come and play to win.”
The Colts have come to win two weeks in a row. Now they’ll try to make it three.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/28/colts-players-cant-understand-why-fans-would-want-them-to-lose/
Posted by Michael David Smith on December 28, 2011, 6:34 PM EST
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/183e2/183e27e0af7a6419f4aa51ca96a35b2965c25f44" alt=""
The Colts head into Week 17 knowing that a loss would get them the first overall pick in the draft, while a win combined with a Rams loss would move the Colts into No. 2 in the draft order. And they know that for Colts fans who want Stanford quarterback Andrew Luck, that could mean cheering for them to lose.
But just because players know that mentality exists, that doesn’t mean they understand it.
“I don’t understand any of that,” Colts tight end Dallas Clark said, in comments distributed by the team. “I am just focused on trying to beat Jacksonville, and I think that everyone in this locker room’s goal is to do that.”
Colts defensive end Dwight Freeney said he gets why Colts fans would want to see the team get a great player in the draft, but he doesn’t have any interest in that discussion.
“I don’t care what pick we get,” Freeney said. “I have never cared. I don’t care if we have [any] first-round picks, I don’t care. It is just me. I go out there, I play hard every day and I let those who make those decisions worry about that. Those who play, we are worrying about playing and playing hard.”
Defensive end Robert Mathis responded to a question by saying that he doesn’t even want to talk about the issue.
“It is better not to respond to that at all,” Mathis said. “We come and play to win.”
The Colts have come to win two weeks in a row. Now they’ll try to make it three.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/12/28/colts-players-cant-understand-why-fans-would-want-them-to-lose/