war_admiral;735154 wrote:holdingout,
When your confronted with "FACTS" you just ignore them and push your propaganda "NEGATIVE COMMENTS" about Reno Field and the program. We show you that Reno Field get's 3 times the traffic/play then a average field in one year and you say were coming up with "excuses". But they are FACTS. The estimated life of our turf is approximately 10-15 years depending on usage. By the way, you do understand maintenance is done in the "OFF-SEASON" every year on "ALL" turf fields just not Reno Field and it's written in the contract. So during the season they fix what they see then conduct a over all maintenance program on the turf. But you wouldn't understand that because your not in the know about OUR turf or ANY turf field.
Let me ask you these questions: Just how many times, in the last year, have you actually been on the turf @ Reno Field? What are the problems of the turf that you say"hasn't held up very well" and I'll address VERY WELL right here and now. I'll argue that the turf has held up exceedingly well or "very well". The fact that Reno Field has seen 3 times the amount of usage then other fields, I would say, prove it's strength.
So just be concerned with what's in your field of fire. Don't try to push a NEGATIVE NARRATIVE in this thread. When we shot down your post on scheduling you posted another negative about Reno Field. What do you do, just throw it to the wall and hope it sticks or that no one will call you on your posts?
RRR
These are the same questions I had! How can some one just come on here and ask, "By the way, when is big red going to replace their turf? Looks like its in bad shape." but then not specify how it's in bad shape! Ive seen the field and up close and although it's not brand new, in no way can I say it's in bad shape! So unless you're just trying to find another way of trying to poke at Big Red, explain to me how the turf is in bad shape!