Monday: Tennessee-Martin (4-8) at Ohio State (12-0)

Home ▸ Archive ▸ College Sports ▸ Monday: Tennessee-Martin (4-8) at Ohio State (12-0)
B

Big Gain

Senior Member

2,073 posts
Jan 1, 2011 7:02 PM
The vast majority on this thread comprehend you as a selfish hater.

My "profound statement" addressed your non-thinker, mind-boggling statement. Prescott thinks WAY WAY to highly of himself when he says, "I enjoy watching competative basketball and Matta chose not to give that too me." Matta DOES NOT care what you like or want. Why would Matta give a nobody like your or me anything??? I expect NOTHING MORE from Matta over and above what he has already favored us with.
Jan 1, 2011 7:02pm
P

Prescott

Senior Member

2,569 posts
Jan 1, 2011 9:43 PM
The vast majority on this thread comprehend you as a selfish hater.
They would be wrong , just as you often are. I'm anything bit a hater.

I'm not buying it because I give them credit for being able to read and comprehend. That is not one of your strong points.


BTW, that great South Carolina team that OSU manhandled lost by 20 at home to BC. Being the great team the Gamecocks are, they whittled down the deficit from 30 to 20 in the last 10 minutes of the game.
Jan 1, 2011 9:43pm
B

Big Gain

Senior Member

2,073 posts
Jan 1, 2011 10:50 PM
Prescott;621090 wrote:They would be wrong , just as you often are. I'm anything bit a hater.

I'm not buying it because I give them credit for being able to read and comprehend. That is not one of your strong points.


BTW, that great South Carolina team that OSU manhandled lost by 20 at home to BC. Being the great team the Gamecocks are, they whittled down the deficit from 30 to 20 in the last 10 minutes of the game.

BTW Liar, show us where I said anything about the great South Carolina team. My only issue are Matta whiners.

I give others here credit because they can comprehend what an ugly whiner you are.
Jan 1, 2011 10:50pm
P

Prescott

Senior Member

2,569 posts
Jan 1, 2011 11:17 PM
show us where I said anything about the great South Carolina team
Again,the comprehension problem. I did not claim that you, specifically,called South Carolina a great team.
I give others here credit because they can comprehend what an ugly whiner you are.
I think they comprehend the substance of the issue, which seems to evade you.

As cbf put it:
Prescott...I am not sure ANYONE disagrees with you.
Jan 1, 2011 11:17pm
B

Big Gain

Senior Member

2,073 posts
Jan 4, 2011 1:23 AM
So, you were talkng to yourself again when you brought up the great South Carolina team? You're personality defect?

Here's a homework assignment for ya. Look up the SOS of the last 10 National Champions. It will make you whine about something else.
Jan 4, 2011 1:23am
P

Prescott

Senior Member

2,569 posts
Jan 4, 2011 6:08 AM
Here's a homework assignment for ya. Look up the SOS of the last 10 National Champions. It will make you whine about something else.
Again, the poor comprehension.We have not been discussing the SOS of any team other than tOSU. Why? Because most of us don't care about who other teams play.

Just for you!!!

Bear in mind OSU's overall SOS is 191 and the non-conference(OOC) schedule is at 220.

Duke (2010)-13(OOC);3 (Overall)
UNC (2009)- 27 (OOC); 12(Overall)
Kansas(2008)-39(OOC); 10 (Overall)
Fla.(2007)- 145(OOC); 48 (Overall)
Fla.(2006)- 196(OOC); 50 (Overall)
UNC(2005)-18(OOC);2 (Overall)
UConn (2004)- 73(OOC); 24(Overall)
Syracuse (2003)- 29(00C); 17(Overall)

http://kenpom.com/index.php?y=2011

Not much to complain about. Florida was a little gutless, but the other champions played above average schedules.Thanks for encouraging me to delve further into the quality of schedules.It shows just how weak OSU's schedule really is. Thanks again.
Jan 4, 2011 6:08am
Jester's avatar

Jester

Valedictorian Hater

700 posts
Jan 4, 2011 11:52 AM
Boom. Roasted.
Jan 4, 2011 11:52am
B

Big Gain

Senior Member

2,073 posts
Jan 5, 2011 1:55 AM
Once again the most immature, most doltish teenager on Ohio Chatter adds nothing of substance.
Jan 5, 2011 1:55am
B

Big Gain

Senior Member

2,073 posts
Jan 5, 2011 2:11 AM
Prescott;624067 wrote:Again, the poor comprehension.We have not been discussing the SOS of any team other than tOSU. Why? Because most of us don't care about who other teams play.

Just for you!!!

Bear in mind OSU's overall SOS is 191 and the non-conference(OOC) schedule is at 220.

Duke (2010)-13(OOC);3 (Overall)
UNC (2009)- 27 (OOC); 12(Overall)
Kansas(2008)-39(OOC); 10 (Overall)
Fla.(2007)- 145(OOC); 48 (Overall)
Fla.(2006)- 196(OOC); 50 (Overall)
UNC(2005)-18(OOC);2 (Overall)
UConn (2004)- 73(OOC); 24(Overall)
Syracuse (2003)- 29(00C); 17(Overall)

http://kenpom.com/index.php?y=2011

Not much to complain about. Florida was a little gutless, but the other champions played above average schedules.Thanks for encouraging me to delve further into the quality of schedules.It shows just how weak OSU's schedule really is. Thanks again.
More proof of your lack of comprehension skills. How many times on this thread have YOU preached this is only about non-conference scheduling?? THUS......OBVIOUSLY ......FOR YOU...... the query posed was about those team's NON-CONFERENCE Streghth of Schedule number.

Do more research, you will see that the vast majority of those teams had a triple didget NON-CONFERENCE SOS number. All top teams from top conferences SOS climbs during the conference schedule and league tournaments, so that by the end of the regular season their SOS is much lower than at the end of their non-conference schedule. As I have noted, more than once, ALL of the top teams from top conferences have non-conference schedules that include 67% nobodies.
Jan 5, 2011 2:11am
P

Prescott

Senior Member

2,569 posts
Jan 5, 2011 10:49 AM
Do more research, you will see that the vast majority of those teams had a triple didget NON-CONFERENCE SOS number.
Those numbers are clearly referenced in the post. Now, I am wondering if you know how to read.According to KENPOM.COM, Florida is the ONLY team with a triple digit non-conference schedule(both years) and the Gators did not surpass OSU's OOC SOS number of 220. Go Bucks!! Thanks again, for the encouragement.

OOC=Non-conference
Jan 5, 2011 10:49am
Jester's avatar

Jester

Valedictorian Hater

700 posts
Jan 5, 2011 1:07 PM
lol. Big FAIL is getting pwned!
Jan 5, 2011 1:07pm
B

Big Gain

Senior Member

2,073 posts
Jan 6, 2011 1:26 AM
This week: Duke 85 - UAB 64, Kentucky 85 - Penn 62, Kansas 99 - UMKC 53.
Jan 6, 2011 1:26am
S

sportswizuhrd

Senior Member

3,215 posts
Jan 6, 2011 11:12 AM
Big Gain;627657 wrote:This week: Duke 85 - UAB 64, Kentucky 85 - Penn 62, Kansas 99 - UMKC 53.
Kansas gave up 52, not 53.


:)
Jan 6, 2011 11:12am
P

Prescott

Senior Member

2,569 posts
Jan 6, 2011 12:01 PM
This week: Duke 85 - UAB 64, Kentucky 85 - Penn 62, Kansas 99 - UMKC 53.
So what?? These games do not impact OSU's OOC SOS. I just checked. OSU's OOC SOS is now 221.That is a big number , no matter how you look at it or how you spin it.
Jan 6, 2011 12:01pm
B

Big Gain

Senior Member

2,073 posts
Jan 7, 2011 2:19 AM
No matter how you spin it, you cannot prove that big number will have any affect on the numbers that count. Big Ten Title and NCAA Tournament. Just like you cannot prove a lower number would change their finish in the Big Ten or NCAA Tournament.
Jan 7, 2011 2:19am
P

Prescott

Senior Member

2,569 posts
Jan 7, 2011 10:37 AM
No matter how you spin it, you cannot prove that big number will have any affect on the numbers that count.
I've never claimed that it did.In fact, I don't think it does. That has never been the argument. If that is what you thought was going on, reading and comprehension are a a big problem for you.
Jan 7, 2011 10:37am
C

centralbucksfan

Senior Member

5,111 posts
Jan 7, 2011 12:48 PM
Prescott;627968 wrote:So what?? These games do not impact OSU's OOC SOS. I just checked. OSU's OOC SOS is now 221.That is a big number , no matter how you look at it or how you spin it.

Last year, OSU played 3 of 4 of the Final Four teams. All three on the road btw. They also had UNC and Cal. Next year, OSU has a return with Florida, goes to South Carolina, plays another ACC team(probably back with UNC or maybe Duke is my guess) and adds Kansas to their schedule. Again, this year is weak, no question. But overall, Matta has done a fairly decent job with the schedule.
Jan 7, 2011 12:48pm
P

Prescott

Senior Member

2,569 posts
Jan 7, 2011 1:49 PM
Again, this year is weak, no question.
Yep.
Jan 7, 2011 1:49pm
Automatik's avatar

Automatik

Senior Member

14,632 posts
Jan 7, 2011 5:29 PM
I didn't know we play Kansas next year. Cool.
Jan 7, 2011 5:29pm
C

centralbucksfan

Senior Member

5,111 posts
Jan 7, 2011 10:35 PM
Automatik;629446 wrote:I didn't know we play Kansas next year. Cool.

Yup, home and home. I think @ Kansas next year, @OSU the following.
Jan 7, 2011 10:35pm
B

Big Gain

Senior Member

2,073 posts
Jan 9, 2011 2:00 AM
Prescott;628952 wrote:I've never claimed that it did.In fact, I don't think it does. That has never been the argument. If that is what you thought was going on, reading and comprehension are a a big problem for you.
As immaterial whining is for you.
Jan 9, 2011 2:00am
P

Prescott

Senior Member

2,569 posts
Jan 9, 2011 10:26 AM
As immaterial whining is for you.

This isn't relevant, but it does show that you read and understood my last post. I'll give you a gold star and an "Atta Boy" for your hard work and showing a comprehension level that far exceeds your previous efforts.
Jan 9, 2011 10:26am
hoops23's avatar

hoops23

Senior Member

15,696 posts
Jan 10, 2011 2:34 AM
FWIW, OSU has 6 teams in the AP 25 left on the schedule..

Duke has 0.

This is current as of today.
Jan 10, 2011 2:34am
thedynasty1998's avatar

thedynasty1998

Senior Member

6,844 posts
Jan 10, 2011 10:49 AM
hoops23;631832 wrote:FWIW, OSU has 6 teams in the AP 25 left on the schedule..

Duke has 0.

This is current as of today.
Saw that on Sportscenter this morning. Really really surprising.
Jan 10, 2011 10:49am
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Jan 10, 2011 5:09 PM
hoops23;631832 wrote:FWIW, OSU has 6 teams in the AP 25 left on the schedule..

Duke has 0.

This is current as of today.

interesting--I didn't know that
Jan 10, 2011 5:09pm