I don't care what the reasoning is that put the kid in Massillon. The only people that should be concerned with why he ended up at Massillon are him and his parents.

BUT...had this kid's dad taken a job at a hospital in Youngstown, and they chose to send their child to Mooney or Ursuline...would you feel the same about the situation skank? I highly doubt it. You would, without a doubt, make a post talking about how he was recruited.

Quit blaming private schools for doing the same thing your school does.

skank;1123492 wrote:Now, to address your question, No, I probably wouldn't react the same, history would probably be the reason. This is the reason there needs to be a seperation.

No, I wouldn't react the same because I'm a huge hypocrite and I will continue to blindly accuse all private schools of recruiting without any basis whatsoever while I defend my school for doing the exact same thing.

skank;1123492 wrote:I didn't refuse to answer your question, I requested that you bring the question over to this thread, where it belongs, and you did....Good boy. Now, to address your question, No, I probably wouldn't react the same, history would probably be the reason. This is the reason there needs to be a seperation.

Al Bundy;1123733 wrote:If you looked at the history, you would see that Massillon has been on probation more than anyone else. Their own fans refer the team as the "best team money can buy". There is currently a push by some of the fan base to put an end to hosting all of these combines to try to bring in top talent from all over the country. So much focus is placed on who can be brought in the off-season program suffers.

sherm03;1123536 wrote:So...basically, this answer should read:



Good to know...

skank;1123775 wrote:A hypocrite would be if Massillon had players living in homes....OWNED BY THE COACHING STAFF. Or, renting....Short term....Apartments "near the highschool", and a Massillon fan complained about parochials doing it.

That's not the case here, Massillon is not allowed to get away with that stuff. Apparently, parochials are.

skank;1167283 wrote:Hey Molin, is this you from "that other" site? You know, when some questioned SS's DI playoff history.


We've been in D1 a whopping three years! How many D1 football titles does the mighty St Johns have? You are aware that a space goes after a sentence? I guess they skipped that on Airport Hwy. Question for you since you're so high on your johnnies. What do they have returning? It seems that you are a little bit butt hurt that Whitmer has beat St. Johns at their own game? I remember a few years back the johnny faithful were on here crying after they got handled by Whitmer in the TCL consolation game. You all were whining that you needed to bring in more talent. What did that get you? You haven't beat Whitmer in 3 years. Ignatius, St. Ed's, Mooney, Ursuline, Watterson, Xavier, Elder, and Moeller are the true private school powers while St. Johns is parochial lite. How can a private school go 7-3 and finish 16th in the region? Thank goodness you all dropped Woodward off of your schedule.
Last edited by rmolin73 : Today at 08:57 AM.

[URL="http://www.*************/forums/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=5309781"][IMG]http://www.*************/forums/images/bluesaint/buttons_red/quote.gif[/IMG][/URL] [URL="http://www.*************/forums/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=5309781"][IMG]http://www.*************/forums/images/bluesaint/buttons_red/multiquote_off.gif[/IMG][/URL]

#1 highlighted comment....An structural sentence lesson? I thought that was frowned upon?
#2 highlighted comment....Whitmer beat St. John at their own game? What game is that?
#3 highlighted comment....Nothing needs to be said here.
#4 highlighted comment....Why wouldn't a private school be able to go 7-3 and finish 16th in their region? Why would that be unacceptable?

Looks like maybe you're finally seeing the light. Or....are you a hypocrite who uses the argument when it fits your needs?

rmolin73;1167708 wrote:tl;dr
Also you are a ****ing stalker aren't you? Get help it's only HS football.

skank;1167283 wrote:





#1 highlighted comment....An structural sentence lesson? I thought that was frowned upon?

skank;1168508 wrote:Nope, no stalker, just swung by "the other site" and saw a contradictory post and thought I would ask if it was you....That's all.

rmolin73;1168572 wrote:You're definately a stalker. If you understood the context of the thread and any of my posts regarding SJJ fans and their ridiculous posts you wouldn't think that it was contradictory. But you don't, so I don't expect you to understand nor am I wasting my time to explain it to you. You take this too serious to copy and paste what I wrote on another site. You used to annoy me but now I kind of feel sorry for you.

skank;1168630 wrote:First of all, I thought you said it was tl and that you dr? Seems we find you on this evening to not only be a hypocrite, but also a liar. Sorry dude, irregardless of the context, you contradicted everything you stand for over here. And then to try and rationalize it all....Sad, just sad.

sherm03;1168738 wrote:Adding the prefix ir- to a word like regardless (which is already negative) creates a double-negative. Basically, irregardless is the incorrect form to use. And despite its appearance in some online dictionaries...it is a nonstandard word and is not considered proper English.


But you probably knew that...right?

skank;1168923 wrote:Bottom line, one of your own has gone astray, but I'm guessing you're going to deal with that in house. It is none of our business how you handle it, but just remember when you do handle it, he threw your precious untouchable parochial schools under the bus.

sherm03;1168928 wrote:I don't even know what you are talking about. You seriously might be retarded.

skank;1168938 wrote:Since I explained it approximately 8 posts back from your last one, if you don't know what I'm talking about, I think there's a good chance that you may be the retarded one. .

All your hard work convincing these yahoos that parochials play the game above the board is for naught because of one rouge member of the PPG.

I love it.

skank;1168971 wrote:Isn't a "comedian" supposed to have a quick wit? :rolleyes:

skank;1169184 wrote:Sherm, you may have already handed down your punishment to rmoron, so this may not affect your decision, but he also said this about TSJ, "they need to send out more flyers". Now, I don't know what the pbg handbook says, but I take it as him implying that parochial schools aren't on the up and up.

It's in your hands now.

At least he knows that the Whitmer/Southview scrimmage is the first one, "always has and will be."

skank;1169184 wrote:Sherm, you may have already handed down your punishment to rmoron, so this may not affect your decision, but he also said this about TSJ, "they need to send out more flyers". Now, I don't know what the pbg handbook says, but I take it as him implying that parochial schools aren't on the up and up.

It's in your hands now.

At least he knows that the Whitmer/Southview scrimmage is the first one, "always has and will be."