skank
Posts: 6,543
Jan 27, 2012 9:42am
rmolin73;1066146 wrote:Life isn't fair. What are you all teaching those kids in Massillon.
I believe that lesson is being taught well to them by the OHSAA.
C
Con_Alma
Posts: 12,198
Jan 27, 2012 9:43am
Noooooo! Please. I would rather see wrestling and track go to 1 division.ccrunner609;1067150 wrote:7 divisions in football better drive them to make Wrestling and Track 4 divisions
There's no reason when they go to a state championship determined by team duals that the individual tournament should be anything but 1 division in wrestling.
D
Dean Wormer
Posts: 333
Jan 27, 2012 5:18pm
Right here is where you said it. Or do you deny it?skank;1065794 wrote:Sorry, when someone resorts to name calling, they're getting frustrated.
Yeah, one of the smallest DI schools in the state playing in 4 semi finals in the past decade, losing a state title game to a PAROCHIAL school TWICE our size by 7 pts....And we're "fading into obscurity."
Again fellas, look at the big picture. Massillon has made it deep enough, I would say more than most.
State Semi's in
72
79
80
82
89
91
01
02
05
09
State Title game in
80
82
05
Yeah, no success there. If we didn't beat publics to get there, (and a few parochials too), who did we beat?
skank
Posts: 6,543
Jan 27, 2012 7:56pm
Not taken out of context.
skank
Posts: 6,543
Jan 27, 2012 8:17pm
Massillon has made it deep enough to, NOT BE OBSCURE. Don't try and twist my words.
sherm03
Posts: 7,349
Jan 27, 2012 8:24pm
Don't get mad at Dean because you don't know how to clearly convey your thoughts.skank;1068068 wrote:Massillon has made it deep enough to, NOT BE OBSCURE. Don't try and twist my words.
skank
Posts: 6,543
Jan 27, 2012 9:14pm
sherm03;1068072 wrote:Don't get mad at Dean because you don't know how to clearly convey your thoughts.
I admit I missed that, but you and the rest of the PBG have tried to twist my words for about 200 pages. As big of a dumb ass as you and the rest of the PBG are, you know I didn't mean it like that.
D
Dean Wormer
Posts: 333
Jan 27, 2012 10:13pm
Neither Sherm or myself said that. You did. I don't think anyone on here is a mind reader to figure out what you meant to say. And you talk about Rocket and his grammar.skank;1068101 wrote:I admit I missed that, but you and the rest of the PBG have tried to twist my words for about 200 pages. As big of a dumb ass as you and the rest of the PBG are, you know I didn't mean it like that.
And I did not twist your words. I quoted them verbatim. That means word for word for you guys from Massillon and Stuebenville.
G
genghis dong
Posts: 391
Jan 28, 2012 9:33am
Name calling? Someone must be frustrated.skank;1068101 wrote:I admit I missed that, but you and the rest of the PBG have tried to twist my words for about 200 pages. As big of a dumb ass as you and the rest of the PBG are, you know I didn't mean it like that.
skank
Posts: 6,543
Jan 28, 2012 9:48am
Dean Wormer;1068188 wrote:Neither Sherm or myself said that. You did. I don't think anyone on here is a mind reader to figure out what you meant to say. And you talk about Rocket and his grammar.
And I did not twist your words. I quoted them verbatim. That means word for word for you guys from Massillon and Stuebenville.
I admitted forgetting that I actually typed the words "deep enough", but then again YOU tried to make it sound like I meant something else.
sherm03
Posts: 7,349
Jan 28, 2012 11:34am
LOL. Reps.genghis dong;1068331 wrote:Name calling? Someone must be frustrated.
skank
Posts: 6,543
Jan 28, 2012 11:55am
genghis dong;1068331 wrote:Name calling? Someone must be frustrated.
I'm not above getting frustrated when people don't understand simple sentences. Or even when they try to twist your words.
"Frustration" has been displayed by the PBG throughout this thread, I believe I'm entitled to it once in a while.
R
Rocket08
Posts: 645
Jan 28, 2012 8:27pm
"skank is just so used to saying "deep enough" he loses track
He says that to thickthin all the time
as in:
"OK thickthin, you're in deep enough" give me the load now
He says that to thickthin all the time
as in:
"OK thickthin, you're in deep enough" give me the load now
D
Dean Wormer
Posts: 333
Jan 28, 2012 11:13pm
I understand simple sentences. I quoted your sentence verbatim. I never twisted your words one bit. I can't help it if you are happy with just making the playoffs. I guess if my team never won anything I would be glad to just go DEEP ENOUGH.skank;1068413 wrote:I'm not above getting frustrated when people don't understand simple sentences. Or even when they try to twist your words.
"Frustration" has been displayed by the PBG throughout this thread, I believe I'm entitled to it once in a while.
skank
Posts: 6,543
Jan 29, 2012 12:38pm
Rocket08;1068717 wrote:"skank is just so used to saying "deep enough" he loses track
He says that to thickthin all the time
as in:
"OK thickthin, you're in deep enough" give me the load now
Good Catholic education I see.
T
Thinthickbigred
Posts: 4,148
Jan 29, 2012 7:50pm
Thats why your kid has my DNA . Your old lady wouldnt let me pull outRocket08;1068717 wrote:"skank is just so used to saying "deep enough" he loses track
He says that to thickthin all the time
as in:
"OK thickthin, you're in deep enough" give me the load now
D
Dean Wormer
Posts: 333
Jan 30, 2012 12:53pm
If you only knew how stupid that statement is even some dumb river rat like you would find it hilarious. That means funny moron.Thinthickbigred;1069382 wrote:Thats why your kid has my DNA . Your old lady wouldnt let me pull out
skank
Posts: 6,543
Jan 30, 2012 4:50pm
It can't be any more stupid than post #4652.
rmolin73
Posts: 4,278
Jan 30, 2012 4:56pm
If it actually existedskank;1070446 wrote:It can't be any more stupid than post #4652.
skank
Posts: 6,543
Jan 30, 2012 5:01pm
rmolin73;1070459 wrote:If it actually existed
My bad, 4562.
D
Dean Wormer
Posts: 333
Jan 30, 2012 11:40pm
Here we go again. Gentlemen you are supposed to guess what the hell Skanky means. What have you been drinking lately Skank?skank;1070446 wrote:It can't be any more stupid than post #4652.
L
landshark0731
Posts: 273
Jan 30, 2012 11:44pm
I think what skank is saying is when Thick posted him for the 4652 time it was stupid. Thick probably didn't let Skanky reciprocate the pleasure!skank;1070446 wrote:It can't be any more stupid than post #4652.
R
Rocket08
Posts: 645
Jan 31, 2012 11:39am
Oh, I get it, stupid as in goodlandshark0731;1070847 wrote:I think what skank is saying is when Thick posted him for the 4652 time it was stupid.
As in skanked loved to get "posted"
And "DEEP ENOUGH"
R
Rocket08
Posts: 645
Jan 31, 2012 11:42am
If you ever actually spoke to a women you'd crap all over yourself. Much less ever be able to performThinthickbigred;1069382 wrote:Thats why your kid has my DNA . Your old lady wouldnt let me pull out
Now, you and skanky, that's different. The two of you obviously have a "thing"
To each, their own. You just don't need to flaunt your alternative lifestyle to those of us who have actually had conversations with women
skank
Posts: 6,543
Feb 2, 2012 4:30pm
Rocket08;1071198 wrote:If you ever actually spoke to a women you'd crap all over yourself. Much less ever be able to perform
Now, you and skanky, that's different. The two of you obviously have a "thing"
To each, their own. You just don't need to flaunt your alternative lifestyle to those of us who have actually had conversations with women
Wow, you have actually had conversations with women? You stud you.
It probably went something like this.
Rain man: "Hey bundy, I'm gonna go talk to this girl."
"Conversations with women", you really must be a sad little boy.
Bundy: "Did you ask sherm if it was ok?"
Rain man: "Yeah, I just texted him, he said it was ok."
Rain man: "Excuse me, but I...."
Girl: "GET AWAY FROM ME BEFORE I CALL THE POLICE."