Al Bundy;1042764 wrote:Here is the state report card if you would like to see what fine academic institution they have in Massillon. http://www.ode.state.oh.us/reportcardfiles/2010-2011/BUILD/039602.pdf

Yeah, I guess when you have a public, city school, you'll probably get numbers like that. Too bad we couldn't pick and choose our students/players like parochials.

rmolin73;1042776 wrote:So me pretty much saying no one gives two ****s about you is backing down. You make this too easy. You have been handled so much on here I think thinprick won't even want you. You're getting wore out.

Yet you have been on here for 173 pages.

landshark0731;1042775 wrote:Skank just so you know how math works. At the end of a football game, you want your team to have more points on the scoreboard than the opponent.

Now I know why you're a "coach".

skank;1042781 wrote:Now I know why you're a "coach".

That is correct. Algebra was a very good course especially learning x,y and z!

skank;1042781 wrote:Now I know why you're a "coach".

And now we know why you sit at the 50

skank;1042778 wrote:Yet you have been on here for 173 pages.

You're a glutton for punishment we all enjoy punishing your lame ass. While thinprick really loves punishing you in the ass.

landshark0731;1042782 wrote:That is correct. Algebra was a very good course especially learning x,y and z!

You didnt get s,t,f,u, though did you?

Thinthickbigred;1042854 wrote:You didnt get s,t,f,u, though did you?

Sorry thick no commas in that acronym. Did you give skank a nice body massage this morning? Or did he serve you some tube steak in your mouth that never shuts completely!

rmolin73;1042788 wrote:You're a glutton for punishment we all enjoy punishing your lame ass. While thinprick really loves punishing you in the ass.

Lame.

landshark0731;1042876 wrote:Sorry thick no commas in that acronym. Did you give skank a nice body massage this morning? Or did he serve you some tube steak in your mouth that never shuts completely!

You have a lot of fantasies about me being naked in one fashion or another don't you?

landshark0731;1042782 wrote:That is correct. Algebra was a very good course especially learning x,y and z!

Just to be clear, my sarcasm is meant to indicate that I don't believe you are a coach.

skank;1042965 wrote:I have a lot of fantasies about me being naked with Thicky while he gives me the rusty trumbone!

Good one Stank, never heard of that one!

You sure know all the vernacular for homosexual sex.

it's gonna be a long time til we get to post # 268?

skank;1042967 wrote:Just to be clear, my sarcasm is meant to indicate that I don't believe you are a coach.

Poor Stank still has chapped ass!

skank;1042974 wrote:You sure know all the vernacular for homosexual sex.

it's gonna be a long time til we get to post # 268?

Well you did set the example from your first 4,800 post!

I thought this was classic.

Faust (foust) A man in legend and literature who sells his soul to the devil for knowledge and power.

I can honestly say I may have never seen anything so appropriate in my life.

skank;1042986 wrote:I thought this was classic.

Faust (foust) A man in legend and literature who sells his soul to the devil for knowledge and power.

I can honestly say I may have never seen anything so appropriate in my life.

Sorry Stank and Bigred Ra-tard! Football is on . You guys however can continue your butt dart adventure!

The facts are private schools such as Mooney and Ursulin can openly recruit athletes without consequenses and its almost impossible to proove because they are private schools . open enrollment isnt even close to comparing the advatages that those schools have .Not only that ,those schools go far beyond just bordering school districts . the point is that Ursulin who is a D-5 team puts a D-1 team on the field yet they play for a D-5 championship . Mooney is a D-3 school eho as well puts a D-1 team on the field and plays for a D-3 championship . We need at the very lerast a multiplyer for super succesful programs . Ive said it before if Big Red fits that criteria Im fine with it as well . Im not talking out both sides of my mouth . The very larg catholic schools are a problem for the larg public schools and Im not really sure what to do about them maybe we do need a seperate playoff system . I would not have just one catholic school playoff Id have two Big school and small school . That way your smaller juggernauts like Newark Catholic and Delphos St John would be in one maybe even with Ursulin although Ursulin is better then those school i think . We need something done with the system becuse it is broken and I am thinking of not Big Red in this equation so much but for the public schools that just dont have a chance against those Mooney's . i know we at Big Red do stand a chance against them but we are in the very small minority

landshark0731;1042989 wrote:Sorry Stank and Bigred Ra-tard! Football is on . You guys however can continue your butt dart adventure!

I know in your trailer, you probably have your computer and your 20" black and white tv in seperate rooms, but I can do both.

The fact that you are going to WATCH the games today only tells me that we can scratch Atlanta, the New York Giants, Pittsburgh & Denver off of the list of possible places you coach. Is this safe to say, or are you posting from the locker room? "Coach".

skank;1042590 wrote:I heard the cigars were real cubans, of course, Mooney has an in, their starting CB is probably from Cuba.

Vouchers at work.

Given the fact that you bash Rocket I will explain it to you. "I heard the cigars were real Cubans. Of course Mooney has an in. Their starting CB is probably from Cuba."

Thinthickbigred;1042992 wrote:The facts are private schools such as Mooney and Ursulin can openly recruit athletes without consequenses and its almost impossible to proove because they are private schools . open enrollment isnt even close to comparing the advatages that those schools have .Not only that ,those schools go far beyond just bordering school districts . the point is that Ursulin who is a D-5 team puts a D-1 team on the field yet they play for a D-5 championship . Mooney is a D-3 school eho as well puts a D-1 team on the field and plays for a D-3 championship . We need at the very lerast a multiplyer for super succesful programs . Ive said it before if Big Red fits that criteria Im fine with it as well . Im not talking out both sides of my mouth . The very larg catholic schools are a problem for the larg public schools and Im not really sure what to do about them maybe we do need a seperate playoff system . I would not have just one catholic school playoff Id have two Big school and small school . That way your smaller juggernauts like Newark Catholic and Delphos St John would be in one maybe even with Ursulin although Ursulin is better then those school i think . We need something done with the system becuse it is broken and I am thinking of not Big Red in this equation so much but for the public schools that just dont have a chance against those Mooney's . i know we at Big Red do stand a chance against them but we are in the very small minority

OK...I'm going to be civil with my response here. Hopefully it helps you see the other side of the viewpoint.

I know that you THINK that Mooney and Ursuline recruit the best players, and have kids from all over the state. But truthfully, they don't. My dad coaches the 7th grade South Catholic team (the team that is made up of the Mooney feeder schools). He coached just about every kid on that state championship team when they were in the 7th grade. I'm not going to sit here and say that kids do not transfer in from public schools. They do. But that goes both ways, too. I have said before, when I was in 8th grade, our star QB on the South Catholic team decided to go to Boardman (and then went on to play ball at YSU) and our center decided to go to Boardman (and went on to play in the NFL). My point is, I think you have an over inflated view of where these kids come from. Yes, a lot come from the suburbs to Mooney. But that is because there are hardly any people living in Youngstown any more. Of those kids coming from the suburbs...I would venture to say that 95% of them are from parochial grade schools.

To your point about having a multiplier for successful programs, I've said before...I don't care where you put Mooney. They will play, and I believe will continue to do well. My problem with your idea is this, why do you want to penalize teams for being good? A state championship is not something that everyone should get to experience. It's a special thing. By forcing good teams up in an effort "to make things fair" you are essentially sending the message that it's not fair that the good teams are there and they should be forced to compete elsewhere. I think that's the wrong message to send to these students. What exactly does that teach them? I don't like the idea of penalizing a team just because they are good. I have no problem with adding a multiplier for schools that get kids from outside of their feeder system. But to penalize a team for being good is just a strange and odd concept to me.

Maybe you can defend that in a different way. Why should we take a good teams like Steubenville or Mooney and move them up a division or two?

skank;1042674 wrote:I'm waiting douche, what is it about my grammar that you don't understand?

Of course Ursuline beat us, how many different counties does the basketball team have kids from?

Skanky

Unlike you and your buddy Thindick I don't sit at a computer all day and night. Most people on here have a productive life full of such things as family, work, etc. After reading Massillon's report card on here I do have to say that I can now understand your ignorance. Go ahead and blame it on the inner city kids but not all schools in inner cities do as poorly as your beloved Massillon. Of course maybe by bringing in the students from Ravenna and Oregon those scores might increase. On a side note you don't complain about those inner city football players that you have.

sherm03;1043015 wrote:OK...I'm going to be civil with my response here. Hopefully it helps you see the other side of the viewpoint.

I know that you THINK that Mooney and Ursuline recruit the best players, and have kids from all over the state. But truthfully, they don't. My dad coaches the 7th grade South Catholic team (the team that is made up of the Mooney feeder schools). He coached just about every kid on that state championship team when they were in the 7th grade. I'm not going to sit here and say that kids do not transfer in from public schools. They do. But that goes both ways, too. I have said before, when I was in 8th grade, our star QB on the South Catholic team decided to go to Boardman (and then went on to play ball at YSU) and our center decided to go to Boardman (and went on to play in the NFL). My point is, I think you have an over inflated view of where these kids come from. Yes, a lot come from the suburbs to Mooney. But that is because there are hardly any people living in Youngstown any more. Of those kids coming from the suburbs...I would venture to say that 95% of them are from parochial grade schools.

To your point about having a multiplier for successful programs, I've said before...I don't care where you put Mooney. They will play, and I believe will continue to do well. My problem with your idea is this, why do you want to penalize teams for being good? A state championship is not something that everyone should get to experience. It's a special thing. By forcing good teams up in an effort "to make things fair" you are essentially sending the message that it's not fair that the good teams are there and they should be forced to compete elsewhere. I think that's the wrong message to send to these students. What exactly does that teach them? I don't like the idea of penalizing a team just because they are good. I have no problem with adding a multiplier for schools that get kids from outside of their feeder system. But to penalize a team for being good is just a strange and odd concept to me.

Maybe you can defend that in a different way. Why should we take a good teams like Steubenville or Mooney and move them up a division or two?

I will maintain being civil with you with responses like this . I dont believe everybody should be able to experiance a state championship . That point I agree with you on for sure .

sherm03;1043015 wrote:OK...I'm going to be civil with my response here. Hopefully it helps you see the other side of the viewpoint.

I know that you THINK that Mooney and Ursuline recruit the best players, and have kids from all over the state. But truthfully, they don't. My dad coaches the 7th grade South Catholic team (the team that is made up of the Mooney feeder schools). He coached just about every kid on that state championship team when they were in the 7th grade. I'm not going to sit here and say that kids do not transfer in from public schools. They do. But that goes both ways, too. I have said before, when I was in 8th grade, our star QB on the South Catholic team decided to go to Boardman (and then went on to play ball at YSU) and our center decided to go to Boardman (and went on to play in the NFL). My point is, I think you have an over inflated view of where these kids come from. Yes, a lot come from the suburbs to Mooney. But that is because there are hardly any people living in Youngstown any more. Of those kids coming from the suburbs...I would venture to say that 95% of them are from parochial grade schools.

To your point about having a multiplier for successful programs, I've said before...I don't care where you put Mooney. They will play, and I believe will continue to do well. My problem with your idea is this, why do you want to penalize teams for being good? A state championship is not something that everyone should get to experience. It's a special thing. By forcing good teams up in an effort "to make things fair" you are essentially sending the message that it's not fair that the good teams are there and they should be forced to compete elsewhere. I think that's the wrong message to send to these students. What exactly does that teach them? I don't like the idea of penalizing a team just because they are good. I have no problem with adding a multiplier for schools that get kids from outside of their feeder system. But to penalize a team for being good is just a strange and odd concept to me.

Maybe you can defend that in a different way. Why should we take a good teams like Steubenville or Mooney and move them up a division or two?

tl;dr

Dean Wormer;1043034 wrote:Skanky

Unlike you and your buddy Thin**** I don't sit at a computer all day and night. Most people on here have a productive life full of such things as family, work, etc. After reading Massillon's report card on here I do have to say that I can now understand your ignorance. Go ahead and blame it on the inner city kids but not all schools in inner cities do as poorly as your beloved Massillon. Of course maybe by bringing in the students from Ravenna and Oregon those scores might increase. On a side note you don't complain about those inner city football players that you have.

That's about as stupid as a comment as I've ever heard. You means the one's who live in MASSILLON?